| Literature DB >> 35493564 |
Asmaa Abo Elgoud Said1, Ahmed H Afifi2, Taha F S Ali3, Mamdouh Nabil Samy1, Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen1,4, Mostafa A Fouad1, Eman Zekry Attia1.
Abstract
Chemical investigation of Aptenia cordifolia roots extract, using chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques, resulted in isolation and identification of eight known compounds. The basic ethyl acetate fraction (alkaloidal fraction) afforded O-methylsceletenone, epinine, 4-methoxy phenethylamine, and N-methyl tyramine while, the acidic ethyl acetate fraction (non-alkaloidal fraction) afforded only cis-N-coumaroyl tyramine. Moreover, the petroleum ether fraction afforded capric acid, tricosanol, and a mixture of β-sitosterol & stigma sterol. Upon screening of anti HCV activity of these three fractions, only the basic ethyl acetate fraction had high activity against HCV with an IC50 value equal to 2.4 μg mL-1 which provoked us to carry out structure based in silico virtual screening on the drug targets of HCV of isolated alkaloidal compounds as well as the previously dereplicated alkaloids through metabolomics from the antiviral active fraction. The tortuosamine compound exhibited the strongest binding to the active site of NS3/4A helicase with a binding affinity (-7.1 kcal mol-1) which is very close to the native ligand (-7.7 kcal mol-1). This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35493564 PMCID: PMC9042107 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06139a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Isolated compounds from alkaloidal fraction.
Fig. 2Dereplicated compounds from alkaloidal fraction.
The binding affinity of the screened compounds with HCV polymerase, protease, helicase, and protease-helicase allosteric binding site
| Ligand | Binding affinity Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymerase | Protease | Helicase | Protease–helicase allosteric | |
| Native ligand (RMSD) | −9.3 (0.28) | −11.3 (0.62) | −7.7 (0.31) | −9.4 (0.16) |
| 1 | −5.1 | −4.8 | −4.7 | −5.5 |
| 2 | −5.1 | −4.8 | −4.9 | −5.7 |
| 3 | −5.3 | −5.0 | −5.1 | −5.9 |
| 4 | −6.6 | −5.9 | −6.5 | −7.0 |
| 5 | −5.2 | −4.8 | −5.3 | −5.7 |
| 6 | −7.4 | −6.7 | −7.1 | −7.9 |
| 7 | −6.1 | −5.6 | −5.7 | −6.7 |
| 8 | −7.1 | −6.9 | −6.0 | −7.4 |
| 9 | −6.3 | −6.4 | −5.7 | −7.3 |
| 10 | −6.4 | −5.9 | −6.0 | −7.2 |
| 11 | −7.1 | −6.4 | −6.4 | −7.1 |
| 12 | −6.8 | −6.9 | −6.4 | −7.3 |
Fig. 3The top-scoring docked pose of compound 6 to the HCV NS5B polymerase active site (PDB code: 3H2L) as predicted by MOE 2019.01. (A) An overview of the HCV NS5B polymerase active site (B) comparison of modeled binding mode of the co-crystallized ligand (a novel bicyclic dihydro-pyridinone inhibitor) (magenta stick model) and its superposed docking conformation (blue stick model). (C) Detailed binding mode of compound 6 (magenta stick model) displaying hydrogen bonds (black dashed line) and H–π interactions (red dashed line) with the key amino acid residue (blue stick model). (D) 2D depiction of compound 6 binding interactions with the critical amino acid residue.
Docking results of the best score compound with HCV NS5B polymerase's active site compared to the native ligand
| Ligand | Binding affinity (Δ | Interaction parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | AA residue |
|
| ||
| Native ligand | −9.3 | H-Donor | Asp 318 (side chain) | 2.71 | −7.2 |
| H-Acceptor | Ser 556 (side chain) | 3.11 | −1.0 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Asn 291 (side chain) | 2.88 | −3.5 | ||
| H–π | Met 414 (side chain) | 4.77 | −0.5 | ||
| 6 | −7.4 | H-Donor | Tyr 415 (side chain) | 3.10 | −0.2 |
| H-Acceptor | Ser 367 (side chain) | 3.40 | −0.2 | ||
| H–π | Tyr 415 (side chain) | 4.59 | −0.6 | ||
| H–π | Met 414 (side chain) | 4.81 | −0.3 | ||
| H–π | Cys 366 (side chain) | 4.23 | −0.2 | ||
Fig. 4The top-scoring docked pose of compound 8 to the HCV NS3/4A protease active site (PDB code 6NZT) as predicted by MOE 2019.01. (A) An overview of the HCV NS3/4A protease active site (B) comparison of modeled binding mode of the co-crystallized ligand Voxilaprevir (magenta stick model) and its superposed docking conformation (cyan stick model). (C) Detailed binding mode of compound 8 (green stick model) displaying H–π bond (red dashed line) with the key amino acid residue (cyan stick model). (D) 2D depiction of compound 8 binding interactions with the key amino acid residue.
Docking results of the best score compound with the active site of HCV NS3-4a protease compared to the native ligand
| Ligand | Binding affinity (Δ | Interaction parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | AA residue |
|
| ||
| Native ligand | −11.3 | H-Donor | Arg 1155 (backbone) | 2.82 | −4.6 |
| H-Donor | His 1057 (side chain) | 3.01 | −7.5 | ||
| H-Donor | Ala 1157 (backbone) | 2.88 | −4.3 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Gly 1137 (backbone) | 3.00 | −1.1 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Gly 1137 (backbone) | 3.02 | −2.8 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Ala 1157 (backbone) | 2.95 | −3.7 | ||
| H–π | His 1057 (side chain) | 3.68 | −1.6 | ||
| 8 | −6.9 | H–π | Lys 1136 (side chain) | 4.36 | −0.6 |
Fig. 5The top-scoring docked pose of compound 6 to the HCV NS3 helicase active site (PDB code 4OKS) as predicted by MOE 2019.01. (A) An overview of the HCV NS3 helicase active site (B) comparison of modeled binding mode of the co-crystallized ligand (magenta stick model) and its superposed docking conformation (blue stick model). (C) Detailed binding mode of compound 6 (magenta stick model) displaying hydrogen bonds (black dashed line) with the key amino acid residue (blue stick model). (D) 2D depiction of compound 6 binding interactions with the key amino acid residues.
Docking results of the best score compound with the active site of HCV helicase compared to the native ligand
| Ligand | Binding affinity (Δ | Interaction parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | AA residue |
|
| ||
| Native ligand | −7.7 | H-Donor | Trp 501 (backbone) | 2.81 | −2.3 |
| H-Acceptor | Gly 255 (backbone) | 2.91 | −3.5 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Gly 255 (backbone) | 2.92 | −4.6 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Thr 269 (side chain) | 3.52 | −1.9 | ||
| 6 | −7.1 | H-Donor | Asp 496 (side chain) | 3.35 | −0.7 |
| H-Donor | Glu 493 (side chain) | 2.91 | −13.1 | ||
| Ionic | Glu 493 (side chain) | 2.91 | −5.1 | ||
Docking results of the best score compound with the active site of HCV protease-helicase allosteric site compared to the native ligand
| Ligand | Binding affinity (Δ | Interaction parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | AA residue |
|
| ||
| Native ligand | −9.4 | H-Donor | Asp 79 (backbone) | 3.46 | −0.7 |
| H-Donor | Cys 525 (backbone) | 3.00 | −4.2 | ||
| H-Donor | H2O (glu 628) | 3.04 | −5.3 | ||
| H-Donor | Leu 517 (backbone) | 2.99 | −1.1 | ||
| H-Acceptor | Cys 525 (backbone) | 2.97 | −4.8 | ||
| 6 | −7.9 | H-Donor | Asp 81 (side chain) | 2.97 | −4.9 |
| Ionic | Asp 81 (side chain) | 3.47 | −2.0 | ||
Fig. 6The top-scoring docked pose of compound 6 to the allosteric site on the HCV NS3–NS4A protein, located between the protease and helicase domains of the HCV NS3 protein (PDB code: 4B73) as predicted by MOE 2019.01. (A) An overview of the allosteric site on the HCV NS3–NS4A protein (B) comparison of modeled binding mode of the co-crystallized ligand (magenta stick model) and its superposed docking conformation (blue stick model). (C) Detailed binding mode of compound 6 (green stick model) displaying hydrogen and ionic bonds (black dashed line) with the key amino acid residue (blue stick model). (D) 2D depiction of compound 6 binding interactions with the key amino acid residue.
Drug-likeness based on Lipinski's rule of five, TPSA and number of rotatable bonds
| Molecule | Hydrogen bond donors | Hydrogen bond acceptors | Number of rotatable bonds |
| Molecular weight | Number of violations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.53 | 151.21 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1.53 | 151.21 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.83 | 165.23 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2.00 | 257.33 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.92 | 167.21 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2.27 | 326.44 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1.75 | 243.31 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2.68 | 275.39 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2.08 | 259.35 | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2.08 | 261.37 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2.24 | 273.38 | 0 |
| 12 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2.33 | 275.39 | 0 |
ADMET and medicinal chemistry properties of isolated as well as dereplicated compounds
| Molecule | Bioavilability score | GI absorption | BBB permeation | Pgp substrate | PAINS alerts | Synthetic accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 1.00 |
| 3 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 1.00 |
| 4 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 3.32 |
| 5 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 1, catechol | 1.09 |
| 6 | 0.55 | High | Yes | Yes | 0 | 3.32 |
| 7 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 3.25 |
| 8 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 2.99 |
| 9 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 2.66 |
| 10 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 1.80 |
| 11 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 3.02 |
| 12 | 0.55 | High | Yes | No | 0 | 1.95 |