| Literature DB >> 35493406 |
Natsuko Yoshida1, Yasumichi Arai2, Midori Takayama3, Yukiko Abe2, Yuko Oguma1,4.
Abstract
In the context of global population ageing and concentration in cities, the population aged 80 and over (80+) is growing rapidly. Japan has the fastest ageing population and longest healthy average life expectancy, while health decline becomes pronounced and care needs increase in the 85+ age group post the 'average life expectancy'. The healthy ageing of older urban community dwellers is a pressing issue in world initiatives for sustainable urbanisation. However, for the 85+ age group, less is known about how promoting/inhibiting factors and their pathways influence healthy ageing, and related longitudinal studies remain insufficient. Using data from a longitudinal cohort study conducted from 2008-2009 to 2014-2015 among independent dwellers aged 85+ in central Tokyo (men = 203, women = 232), this study analysed the impact pathways of environmental, social, and behavioural factors on health and survival to explore promoters and potential risks on healthy ageing by gender, with multi-group structural equation modelling (SEM) and Bayesian SEM. For both genders, there was a positive chained pathway starting from friends as facilitators through positive interactions between 'social participation' and 'active behaviour' to 'ageing-related health'. Additionally, their personal networks were small, suggesting that men with family-centred networks and women with non-family-centred networks require different approaches and supports. Implications of the results are discussed, and an organised social watch and support system, which becomes more important in the 'new normal' for urban dwellers aged 85+, is recommended.Entities:
Keywords: Active behaviour; Healthy ageing; Longitudinal study; Social relationship; Urban dweller
Year: 2022 PMID: 35493406 PMCID: PMC9046878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SSM Popul Health ISSN: 2352-8273
Fig. 1Analytic model illustrating the paths from behavioural factors with environmental factors to health and survival.
Fig. 2Flowchart representing the selection criteria of the analytical participants.
Descriptive statistics of participants by gender.
| Observed variables | Male | Female | Gender difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL n = 435 | 203 | 46.7% | 232 | 53.3% | |
| n = 362 | 165 | 45.6% | 197 | 54.4% | |
| Age | 86 | 85–88 | 87 | 86–88 | p = 0.176a |
| Household budget | p = 0.489b | ||||
| Not straitened | 171 | 84.2% | 205 | 88.4% | |
| Housing type | p = 0.010b* | ||||
| Residential complex | 73 | 36.0% | 113 | 48.7% | |
| Marital status | p < 0.001b*** | ||||
| Without a spouse currently | 50 | 24.6% | 198 | 85.3% | |
| Number of family members living together | 2 | 2–2 | 1 | 1–2 | p < 0.001a*** |
| Living alone | 35 | 17.2% | 120 | 51.7% | |
| Children living separately | p = 0.014b* | ||||
| Yes, I have | 163 | 80.3% | 161 | 69.4% | |
| Neighbours visiting each other's homes | p = 0.103b | ||||
| Yes | 17 | 8.4% | 32 | 13.8% | |
| Number of friends | 1 | 0–3 | 2 | 0–3 | p = 0.547a |
| None | 82 | 40.4% | 82 | 35.3% | |
| Usage of care service | p = 0.019b* | ||||
| User | 23 | 11.3% | 47 | 20.3% | |
| Frequency of visiting friends | p = 0.010b* | ||||
| More than once a week | 37 | 18.2% | 78 | 33.6% | |
| No visit | 60 | 29.6% | 55 | 23.7% | |
| Frequency of attending meetings | p = 0.619b | ||||
| More than once a week | 40 | 19.7% | 53 | 22.8% | |
| No participation | 107 | 52.7% | 102 | 44.0% | |
| Physical Activity (METs hours/week) | 9.3 | 3.0–19.6 | 7.0 | 2.8–14.6 | p = 0.146a |
| Outing frequency | p = 0.224b | ||||
| More than once a day | 133 | 65.5% | 131 | 56.5% | |
| Infrequent | 10 | 4.9% | 11 | 4.7% | |
| Activities of daily living: ADL | 100 | 100–100 | 100 | 100–100 | p = 0.013a* |
| W2 | 100 | 95–100 | 100 | 90–100 | p < 0.001a*** |
| Instrumental ADL | 5 | 5–5 | 5 | 4–5 | p = 0.387a |
| W2 | 5 | 4–5 | 5 | 3–5 | p = 0.005a** |
| Mini-Mental State Examination | 28 | 26–29 | 27 | 25–29 | p = 0.064a |
| W2 | 28 | 25–29 | 27 | 25–29 | p = 0.045a* |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.1 | 3.9–4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0–4.3 | p = 0.258a |
| W2 | 4.1 | 3.8–4.3 | 4.1 | 3.9–4.4 | p = 0.251a |
| Grip strength (kg) | 24.8 | 21.5–27.5 | 16.5 | 14.1–19.0 | p < 0.001a*** |
| W2 | 22.0 | 18.9–24.6 | 15.0 | 12.5–17.8 | p < 0.001a*** |
| Survival days for 6 years | 2,114 | 1,290–2,190 | 2,190 | 1,459–2,190 | p = 0.027a* |
Notes) Values are expressed as numbers and percentage or median and interquartile range, a: Mann–Whitney U test, b: χ2 test, *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001, W2: Wave2, Wave not shown: Wave1.
Fig. 3Significant paths in Model 1 of the MG-SEM with metric invariance.
Fig. 4Significant paths in Model 2 of the MG-SEM with metric invariance.