| Literature DB >> 35493011 |
Chih-Hui Yang1,2,3, Ya-Chin Wang1,4, Ta-Chen Wang4, Yi-Ching Chang1, Yun-Chul Lin1, Pei-Fan Chen1, Wei-Jie Huang1, Hsin-Yi Wen1, Yu-Mei Lin1,4, Wen-Shuo Kuo5, Yi-Ting Wang1, Keng-Shiang Huang4.
Abstract
"Calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2]" is a medicament frequently used for antimicrobial purposes in endodontic procedures, or it is used as a toxic-waste adsorbent in industry. Ca(OH)2 particles produced through conventional methods are size untunable and have a wide size distribution and polygonal shape. In this paper, a novel and facile approach involving template-mediated synthesis and two-step ion exchange is proposed for uniform size Ca(OH)2 composite particles generation. "Sodium-alginate (Na-alginate)" was used as a precursor, and monodisperse Na-alginate emulsions were formed through needle droplet or droplet microfluidic technology. After the first ion exchange step with the Ca2+ ions, "calcium-alginate (Ca-alginate)" particles were obtained. The Ca-alginate particles were intermediate reaction products and were designed to be the templates for ensuring the spherical shape and size of products. The OH- ions were used for the second ion exchange step to fabricate Ca(OH)2 composite particles. The results revealed that the Ca(OH)2 composite particles were size tunable, had a spherical shape, and were monodisperse (with a relative standard deviation of less than 8%). The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay revealed that the Ca(OH)2 composite particles were potential biocompatible materials. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35493011 PMCID: PMC9051553 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra01275k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Synthesis of Ca(OH)2 composite particles by using two ion exchange steps.
Comparisons of flow rates and diameters of Ca-alginate and Ca(OH)2 by droplet microfluidic technologya
| Flow rate of continuous phase (mL min−1) | Flow rate of dispersed phase (mL h−1) | Ca-alginate particles | Ca(OH)2 composite particles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average size (μm) | S.D. (μm) | R.S.D. (%) | Average size (μm) | S.D. (μm) | R.S.D. (%) | ||
| 0.7 | 0.2 | 404.9 | 9.1 | 2.2 | 549.9 | 24.5 | 4.5 |
| 0.16 | 389.3 | 7.3 | 1.9 | 488.8 | 19.3 | 3.9 | |
| 0.12 | 384.6 | 8.7 | 2.3 | 455.2 | 6.4 | 1.4 | |
| 0.08 | 369.4 | 8.8 | 2.4 | 420.9 | 12.6 | 2.9 | |
| 0.6 | 0.2 | 429.8 | 9.8 | 2.3 | 582.3 | 16.7 | 2.8 |
| 0.16 | 404.6 | 11.5 | 2.8 | 570.7 | 20.6 | 3.6 | |
| 0.12 | 399.1 | 12.7 | 3.2 | 510.9 | 13.9 | 2.7 | |
| 0.08 | 388.7 | 17.7 | 4.5 | 477.3 | 15.6 | 3.3 | |
| 0.5 | 0.2 | 463.2 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 605.5 | 18.3 | 3.1 |
| 0.16 | 462.1 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 598.9 | 16.8 | 2.8 | |
| 0.12 | 454.9 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 561.9 | 12.7 | 2.3 | |
| 0.08 | 454.4 | 19.8 | 4.4 | 496.2 | 36.2 | 7.3 | |
| 0.4 | 0.2 | 506.6 | 17.1 | 3.4 | 657.7 | 13.7 | 2.1 |
| 0.16 | 505.9 | 11.3 | 2.2 | 653.6 | 11.7 | 1.8 | |
| 0.12 | 500.5 | 13.4 | 2.7 | 623.3 | 17.1 | 2.7 | |
| 0.08 | 471.6 | 24.8 | 5.3 | 532.1 | 17.2 | 3.2 | |
S.D.: standard deviation, R.S.D.: relative standard deviation.
Fig. 2Optical microscope and SEM images of Ca-alginate and Ca(OH)2 composite particles, which prepared by using droplet microfluidic method. (a and c) Optical microscope images of wet Ca-alginate particles, (b and d) optical microscope images of wet Ca(OH)2 composite particles; (e–g) SEM images of dry Ca-alginate particles, and (h–l) SEM images of dry Ca(OH)2 composite particles.
Fig. 3Optical microscope and SEM images of Ca-alginate and Ca(OH)2 particles, which prepared by using by needle droplet method. Optical microscope images of (a) wet Ca-alginate particles; (b) dry Ca-alginate particles; (c) wet Ca(OH)2 composite particles; and (d) dry Ca(OH)2 composite particles. SEM images of (e) full Ca-alginate particle; (f) top view of cross-sectional of Ca-alginate particle; (g) side view of cross-sectional of Ca-alginate particle; (h) full Ca(OH)2 composite particle; (i) top view of cross-sectional of Ca(OH)2 composite particle; (j) side view of cross-sectional of Ca(OH)2 composite particle.
Fig. 4(a) FTIR spectra of the Ca(OH)2 standard, synthesized Ca-alginate particles and Ca(OH)2 composite particles. (b) XRD patterns of the Ca(OH)2 standard and synthesized Ca(OH)2 composite particles.
Fig. 5The MTT assay of the synthesized Ca(OH)2 composite particle in (a) NIH/3T3 cell and (b) MCF-7 cell, respectively.