| Literature DB >> 35492971 |
Ruifen Peng1, Yuxia Pang1, Xueqing Qiu1,2, Yong Qian1, Mingsong Zhou1.
Abstract
In the formulation of pesticide Suspension Concentrate (SC), some photosensitive pesticides are easily decomposed in the preparation. In this study, a hindered amine modified lignosulfonate (SL-Temp) with anti-photolysis function was synthesized using 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (Temp) and Sodium Lignosulfonate (SL) to solve this problem. The obtained SL-Temp was used as a dispersant to prepare 5% SC of avermectin, which shows good physical stability. The decomposition rate of the avermectin in SC after accelerating hot storage is 0%, which is much lower than 6.1% when SL was used as the dispersant. After being exposed to UV irradiation for 60 hours, the highest retention rate of avermectin is 87.1% when SL-Temp was used as the dispersant, which is much higher than 73.6% when SL was used as the dispersant, and also higher than 76.3% when a small molecule antioxidant (BHT) was added to the formulation. QCM-D studies revealed that the SL-Temp adsorption layer on avermectin particles can compete to absorb partial ultraviolet rays, hinder the penetration of ultraviolet light, and scavenge the free radicals produced by photooxidation, so as to protect avermectin from degradation. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35492971 PMCID: PMC9051638 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra10626j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The chemical structure of avermectin.
Fig. 2The molecular design and reaction process of SL-Temp.
The formula of 5% avermectin SCa
| Component | Reagent | Dosage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Pure drug | Avermectin (purity 92.2%) | 5.3 |
| Dispersant | SL or SL-Temp | 3.0 |
| Wetting agent | Nekal BX | 0.5 |
| Static stabilizer | Magnesium aluminium silicate solution | 40.0 |
| Xanthan gum solution | 8.0 | |
| Antifreeze agent | Ethylene glycol | 3.0 |
| Defoamer | Organic silicon | 0.5 |
| Medium | Water | Add to 100 |
Before grinding, the magnesium silicate and xanthan gum should be dissolved in water to obtain 2.5% swelling solution for use.
Elemental analysis of different SL-Temp samples
| Samples | Elemental Content (%) | Temp Content (%) | Sulfonation degree (mmol g−1) | Grafting efficieny (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | S | wt% | mmol g−1 | |||
| SL | 0.11 | 5.55 | — | — | 1.73 | — |
| SL-Temp1 | 1.84 | 5.01 | 7.29 | 0.62 | 1.57 | 78.63 |
| SL-Temp2 | 2.36 | 4.90 | 12.48 | 0.80 | 1.53 | 71.30 |
| SL-Temp3 | 3.35 | 4.38 | 17.97 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 73.02 |
Fig. 3FT-IR spectra of SL and SL-Temp3.
Fig. 41H-NMR spectra of SL and SL-Temp3.
Fig. 5EPR spectra of SL and SL-Temp3.
Zeta potential and average particle size (D50) of 5% avermectin SC with different dispersants
| Samples |
| Zeta potential/mv |
|---|---|---|
| SL | 3.01 | −49.7 ± 0.1 |
| SL-Temp1 | 2.94 | −43.0 ± 3.4 |
| SL-Temp2 | 2.96 | −39.3 ± 1.9 |
| SL-Temp3 | 3.14 | −36.4 ± 1.1 |
Hot storage stability of 5% avermectin SC with different dispersants
| Dispersant | Before hot storage | After hot storage | Decomposition rate of avermectin/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active ingredient content/% | Suspensibilty/% | Particle size | Active ingredient content/% | Suspensibilty/% | Particle size | ||
| SL | 4.9 ± 0.01 | 99.2 ± 0.46 | 3.06 | 4.6 ± 0.01 | 99.3 ± 0.28 | 2.83 | 6.1 |
| SL-Temp1 | 5.1 ± 0.08 | 100.0 ± 0.99 | 3.00 | 4.8 ± 0.06 | 99.6 ± 1.38 | 2.83 | 5.9 |
| SL-Temp2 | 4.7 ± 0.03 | 99.5 ± 0.31 | 3.00 | 4.7 ± 0.02 | 99.8 ± 0.60 | 3.00 | 0.0 |
| SL-Temp3 | 4.7 ± 0.01 | 99.5 ± 0.02 | 3.17 | 4.7 ± 0.02 | 99.2 ± 0.21 | 3.11 | 0.0 |
Fig. 6(a) Δf adsorption curves of different dispersants on avermectin; (b) ΔD adsorption curves of different dispersants on avermectin.
Fig. 7UV degradation curves of avermectin in the SC with different additives.
Fig. 8The anti-photolysis model diagram of the avermectin SC with SL-Temp and BHT additives.