Literature DB >> 35492682

Tellurium-oxygen group enhanced birefringence in tellurium phosphates: a first-principles investigation.

Pengyun Jin1, Xuerui Shi1, Xiuhua Cui1, Yi Jiang1, Qun Jing1, Ming-Hsien Lee2, Mengqiu Long1,3, Haibin Cao4, Hanqin Ding1.   

Abstract

Phosphates possess a relatively large UV/DUV cutoff edge, but these compounds usually have very small birefringence. Recently the Te2P2O9 crystal was synthesized and its birefringence was reported to be as large as 0.106 at 1013.98 nm. Herein, we investigated the electronic structure and optical properties of Te2P2O9 using the first-principles method. The obtained results are in good agreement with the experimental values. The Born effective charges and SHG density of Te2P2O9 show that the contribution to the birefringence and SHG response mainly originates from the TeO5 group. The electronic structures and optical response of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 were also investigated for comparison. The results show that these two tellurium phosphates also possess a large birefringence similar to Te2P2O9. Also, the birefringence originates from the TeO x polyhedrons, which was confirmed by the real-space atom-cutting results and distortion indices. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35492682      PMCID: PMC9049004          DOI: 10.1039/c9ra10653g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   4.036


Introduction

Nowadays, nonlinear optical (NLO) materials have attracted widespread attention because they can be used to obtain wide-band and tunable laser sources via the second order NLO effect.[1-5] During the past decades, numerous inorganic NLO materials have been obtained, including infrared, visible and ultraviolet (UV) materials.[6-10] Also, borates, phosphates and carbonates are thought to be good candidates for UV/deep-UV NLO compounds, such as BBO,[11,12] LiB3O5 (LBO),[13-15] CsLiB6O10 (CLBO),[16-18] CsB3O5 (CBO),[19,20] and KBe2BO3F2 (KBBF).[21-24] It has been proven that the introduction of fluorine into borates is beneficial to obtain short UV cutoff edges and suitable birefringence and large NLO responses,[25,26] and new deep-UV fluorooxoborates with good performances were obtained such as Li2B6O9F2,[25] AB4O6F (A = NH4, K, Rb, and Cs),[27,28] and SrB5O7F3.[29] Recently, phosphates have been reported to be good candidates as UV and deep-UV NLO crystal materials because of their short UV cut-off edge,[30,31] including Rb2Ba3(P2O7)3 (<200 nm),[32] Ba5P6O20 (about 167 nm),[33] and KLa(PO3)4 (162 nm).[34] However, phosphates also have drawbacks. Most of the reported phosphates have a relatively small birefringence, which has relationship with the regular tetrahedron of the PO4 units. First principles investigations show that the anisotropic polarization of the regular PO4 unit is relatively small. Thus, to overcome this inherent drawback, different types of d0 transition metal cations (Ti4+, Mo6+, etc.)[35] and lone pair electrons (Bi3+, Te4+, Pb2+, etc.) are introduced to phosphates. Wang et al. at Shandong University[36] obtained large-size Te2P2O9 crystals via the Czochralski method. The crystals had the acentric polar space group Cc, and their basic building units were the PO4 tetrahedron and TeO5 square pyramid. Their linear and nonlinear optical properties were also investigated.[36] The SHG response and birefringence of Te2P2O9 are relatively large, which is 1.3 × KDP, and 0.13786–0.10615 at 404.66–1013.98 nm, respectively. Curiously, how can it possess such a large birefringence in comparison with other phosphates? Also, what is the origination of this large birefringence in phosphates? Herein, we calculated the electronic structure and optical properties of Te2P2O9. The obtained refractive indices, birefringence and SHG tensor agree well with the experimental values. Utilizing its electronic structures, Born effective charges, and the SHG density method, the atomic contribution to the birefringence and SHG tensors of Te2P2O9 are investigated. The results show that the TeO5 polyhedrons give the main contribution to the optical anisotropic birefringence and SHG response. Furthermore the optical response of the other tellurium phosphates Ba2TeO(PO4)2 (ref. 37) and Te3O3(PO4)2 (ref. 38) were also investigated for comparison. These two compounds possess similar basic building units as Te2P2O9, which are an isolated PO4 tetrahedron and TeO polyhedrons (more details can be found in Table S1 in the ESI†). These two compounds also have very large birefringence like Te2P2O9. The large birefringence in these tellurium phosphates originate from the TeO polyhedrons, which was further confirmed by the real-space atom-cutting results and the distortion indices.

Computational details

To better understand the relationship between the structure and optical properties, the electronic structure and Born effective charges were investigated using the first-principles method implemented in the CASTEP package.[39,40] During the calculation, the exchange-correlation functional with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)[41,42] functional and the norm-conserving pseudopotentials (NCP) was adopted. The kinetic energy cutoffs were set as 830 eV for Te2P2O9, 830 eV for Te3O3(PO4)2, and 830 eV for Ba2TeO(PO4)2. The k-point mesh in the Monkhorst–Pack was set as 5 × 5 × 3 (Te2P2O9), 2 × 3 × 3 (Te3O3(PO4)2), and 4 × 4 × 3 (Ba2TeO(PO4)2). After the electronic structures were obtained, the refractive indices and the birefringence were further calculated via the OPTADOS code.[43,44] The nonlinear optical tensors of Te2P2O9 were further investigated using the method described in ref. 45–47. For comparison, the electronic structures and optical properties of Te2P2O9 were also investigated using the LDA(CA-PZ), GGA(PW91) and GGA(RPBE) functionals (shown in Table S2 in the ESI†). The results show that the GGA-PBE functional gives more reliable results in comparison with the experimental values. Hence, herein, we only discuss the GGA-PBE results.

Results and discussions

The electronic structures of Te2P2O9

Using the method described above, the band structures and the projected density of states of Te2P2O9 were obtained. It can be seen clearly from Fig. 1 that Te2P2O9 is an indirect bandgap compound with the bandgap of 3.43 eV. The obtained bandgap is smaller than the experimental value (about 4.30 eV).[36] This underestimation of the bandgap may be related with the derivative discontinuity of the exchange-correlation energy.[48]
Fig. 1

Obtained band structures of Te2P2O9.

The projected density of states (PDOS) of Te2P2O9 is shown in Fig. 2. For the Te2P2O9 compound, the states of the valence bands (VB) from −10 eV to the Fermi level are mainly the Te sp, P sp and O sp states. The states at the bottom of the conduction bands (CB) from 3 eV to 6.5 eV are dominated by the Te 5p and O 2p orbitals. From the states at the valence band and the conduction band, the hybrid states of the P–O and Te–O chemical bonds can be determined. According to the revised model,[10,49-53] the lone pair states from the Te–O chemical bond can be deduced. The optical properties of the material are closely related to the electronic transition between the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band. Hence, we believe that the Te–O and P–O chemical bonds play an important role in determining the optical properties of Te2P2O9.
Fig. 2

Projected density of states (PDOS) of Te2P2O9.

The refractive indices and Born effective charges of Te2P2O9

The obtained refractive indices and birefringence of Te2P2O9 are shown in Fig. 3. From the data shown in Fig. 3, it can be determined that the calculated refractive indices follow the order of nx > ny > nz. The calculated birefringence is 0.12496–0.09236 in the wavelength range of 404.65–1013.61 nm. It is interesting to note that the reported experimental birefringence of Te2P2O9 is 0.13786–0.10615 in the wavelength range of 404.66–1013.98 nm. Thus, it is obvious that the calculated value matches well with the experimental value.
Fig. 3

Calculated refractive indices and birefringence of Te2P2O9.

To better understand the atomic contribution to the optical anisotropic birefringence, the Born effective charges[54-56] were also investigated in this work. Because the optical anisotropic birefringence is closely related with the difference in the macroscopic polarizability along different optical axes, we focused on the anisotropic polarization.[57-59] The Born effective charges are defined as:where δp is the change in polarization along the displacement direction δd. More details can be found elsewhere.[60,61] The obtained Born effective charges are shown in Table 1 and Table S3 in the ESI.† It is interesting to note that unlike ABCO3F described in ref. 61, which has nondiagonal tensors of atomic Born effective charges of almost zero, nonzero nondiagonal tensors are found in Te2P2O9. As described in ref. 61, the base unit of ABCO3F compounds are CO3 groups, and the CO3 groups are all in a coplanar plane, which makes the nondiagonal tensors of the Born effective charges in these carbonates vanish. In contrast, for the Te2P2O9 compound described herein, it crystallizes in a 3D structure with PO4 tetrahedrons and a TeO5 square pyramid connected by Te–O and P–O chemical bonds. This complicated 3D structure makes it possess nonzero Born effective charges (shown in Table S3 in ESI†). Specifically, when the Te2P2O9 compound is exposed to an external electric field along the special direction, the electrons move everywhere, not only in the direction of the external electric field, but also the vertical direction. Hence, nonzero nondiagonal Born effective charges can be found in Te2P2O9. Furthermore, we also performed a detailed investigation into the diagonal Born effective charges along the optic principal axis and calculated the difference in the Born effective charges. As described above, the refractive indices follow the sequence of nx > ny > nz, thus the difference in the Born effective charges was obtained by the qxx − qzz. The obtained diagonal tensor of the atomic Born effective charges of Te2P2O9qBorn is shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, a relatively large difference in the Born effective charge tensors was found in the Te and O atoms, while the P atoms possess a relative small difference in comparison, implying that the Te and O atoms make a relatively large atomic contribution to the anisotropic birefringence. We believe that the contribution to the birefringence is provided mainly by the TeO5 group.

Obtained diagonal tensor of the atomic Born effective charges of Te2P2O9

CompoundAtom q xx q yy q zz Δq(Born)
Te2P2O9Te14.342654.659366.63644−2.29379
Te26.42185.388423.372183.04962
Te34.342654.659366.63644−2.29379
Te46.42185.388423.372183.04962
P14.402853.492994.362970.03988
P24.709194.864153.775070.93412
P34.402853.492994.362970.03988
P44.709194.864153.775070.93412
O1−1.78151−1.84853−2.743560.96205
O2−3.2844−2.12701−1.33367−1.95073
O3−2.85789−1.94646−1.32288−1.53501
O4−1.40561−0.89945−3.713912.3083
O5−1.30274−2.25599−1.888280.58554
O6−1.56074−3.25254−1.867120.30638
O7−1.54143−1.92023−2.762311.22088
O8−3.00828−2.10674−1.13507−1.87321
O9−3.13389−2.04796−1.37986−1.75403
O10−1.78151−1.84853−2.743560.96205
O11−3.2844−2.12701−1.33367−1.95073
O12−2.85789−1.94646−1.32288−1.53501
O13−1.40561−0.89945−3.713912.3083
O14−1.30274−2.25599−1.888280.58554
O15−1.56074−3.25254−1.867120.30638
O16−1.54143−1.92023−2.762311.22088
O17−3.00828−2.10674−1.13507−1.87321
O18−3.13389−2.04796−1.37986−1.75403

The contribution from TeO polyhedrons in tellurium phosphate

To better understand the contribution from the TeO polyhedrons to the birefringence, the electronic structures and the optical response of the other tellurium phosphates Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 were also investigated. The obtained band structures and projected density of states (PDOS) of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 are shown in Fig. S1–S4 in the ESI.† As shown in Fig. S1 and S3,† the obtained bandgap of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 are 4.11 and 3.63 eV, respectively. To overcome the underestimation of the bandgap, HSE06 calculations[62] were performed using the PWmat code.[63,64] The obtained HSE06 bandgap of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 is 4.47, and 4.18 eV, respectively. As shown in Fig. S2 and S4,† the states at the top of the valence band and at the bottom of the conduction band are mainly the Te-sp states, O-sp states, and P-sp states. Also, the chemical bonds of Te–O and P–O can also be found at the top of the valence band. Hence, it can be deduced that the TeO polyhedron and PO4 tetrahedron may play an important role in determining the optical response of these tellurite phosphates. The refractive indices and birefringence of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 were also obtained using the method described above, and the results are shown in Fig. S5 and S6,† respectively, and Table 2. As shown in Fig. S5 and S6,† the Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 possess a relatively large birefringence of 0.110 and 0.121 (at 1064 nm), respectively. The birefringence of these compounds follow the sequence of Δn(Te3O3(PO4)2) > Δn(Ba2TeO(PO4)2) > Δn(Te2P2O9).

The obtained refractive indices and birefringence (at 1064 nm) of Te2P2O9, Ba2TeO(PO4)2, and Te3O3(PO4)2 after real-space atom-cutting was performed

CrystalContribution n x n y n z Δn
Te2P2O9Cut-PO1.4841.4581.4050.079
Cut-TeO1.2321.2261.2030.029
Origin2.0311.9741.9390.092
Ba2TeO(PO4)2Cut-BaO1.4081.3321.3230.085
Cut-PO1.5551.4861.4750.080
Cut-TeO1.6001.5881.5630.037
Origin1.8771.8601.7670.110
Te3O3(PO4)2Cut-PO1.6221.5851.5700.052
Cut-TeO1.2431.2291.2110.032
Origin2.0271.9981.9060.121
The contribution from different polyhedrons was further investigated using the real-space atom-cutting method.[45] During the calculation, the atom-cutting radius of O, P, Te, and Ba was set as 1.10, 0.95, 0.96, and 1.74 Å, respectively. After the real-space atom-cutting method was performed, the refractive indices and birefringence of Te2P2O9, Ba2TeO(PO4)2, and Te3O3(PO4)2 were obtained, which are shown in Table 2, and Fig. S7–S9 in the ESI,† respectively. As shown in Table 2, in comparison with the PO4 tetrahedron and BaO polyhedrons, the TeO polyhedrons give the main contribution to the total birefringence. Taking Te2P2O9 as example, the its birefringence is about 0.092 at 1064 nm. However, after the TeO5 polyhedron was removed, the obtained birefringence of the other part (marked as cut-TeO) is only about 0.029, implying that the TeO5 polyhedron may give a contribution of about (0.092 − 0.029 = 0.063) to the total birefringence of Te2P2O9. Thus, in comparison with the PO4 tetrahedron, the TeO5 polyhedron gives main contribution to the total birefringence. A similar conclusion was also found for the other tellurium phosphates, Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 (as shown in Table 2). It is interesting to note that the conclusion obtained from the real-space atom-cutting is consistent with the results obtained from the Born-effective charges analysis (as described above). The optical anisotropic birefringence is related with the anisotropic optical response from the different polyhedrons. The relatively small anisotropic polarization of the regular PO4 unit may be related with the relatively small distortion with the regular PO4 unit. Herein, the distortion indices of the different polyhedrons in these tellurium phosphates were also investigated. The distortion indices, defined by Baur as [65] was calculated using the VESTA software.[66] The obtained distortion indices of the different polyhedrons in these tellurium phosphates are shown in Table 3. As described above, the TeO polyhedrons give the main contribution to the total birefringence, and hence was focused on the distortion indices of the TeO polyhedron. As shown in Table 3, the distortion indices of the TeO polyhedrons follow the sequence of D(Te3O3(PO4)2) > D(Ba2TeO(PO4)2) > D(Te2P2O9), which is consistent with the sequence of the birefringence of Δn(Te3O3(PO4)2) > Δn(Ba2TeO(PO4)2) > Δn(Te2P2O9).

The obtained distortion indices of the different polyhedrons in Te2P2O9, Ba2TeO(PO4)2, and Te3O3(PO4)2

Te2P2O9Ba2TeO(PO4)2Te3O3(PO4)2
PO40.0050.0200.013
TeOx0.0340.0390.051
BaOx0.034

The atomic contribution to the SHG response of Te2P2O9

The SHG tensors of Te2P2O9 were also obtained (shown in Table 4). For that crystallized in the Cc space group, there are six independent nonzero SHG tensors, d11, d12, d13, d15, d24 and d33. As shown in Table 4, for Te2P2O9, the maximum is d33 = 1.01 pm V−1, which is about 2.6 times that of d36(KDP). The obtained SHG tensors are comparable with the experimental powder second-harmonic generation (PSHG) intensity (about 1.3 × KDP). The experimental values agree well with the calculated values, indicating that the method selected in this work is appropriate. To deeply investigate the atomic contribution to the SHG tensors, the spatial distribution of the atomic SHG density was also calculated. The SHG density method is a normalized weighting coefficient via the use of the effective SHG response of each occupied and unoccupied band.[59,60] Using this method, the states irrelevant to the SHG response will not be shown, and the distribution of the SHG density represents the origin of the SHG response. Herein, we only show the SHG density obtained from the virtual electron process (labeled as veocc) and the virtual hole process (labeled as vhunocc). The obtained SHG density of Te2P2O9 is shown in Fig. 4, where the color part and white–black part represent the SHG density of the veocc and vhunocc process, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4, there is no SHG distribution around the P atoms, implying that the P atoms give a relatively small contribution to the total SHG response. It is shown that the SHG density is distributed mainly on the Te and O atoms, indicating that the TeO5 polyhedrons give the main contribution to the total SHG response.

The calculated SHG tensors and experimental powder SHG (PSHG) intensity

CrystalSpace groupCalculated SHG tensors (pm V−1)PSHG intensity
Te2P2O9 Cc d 11 = −0.17, d15 = −0.53, d12 = 0.59, d13 = −0.56, d24 = −0.95, d33 = 1.011.3 × KDP
Fig. 4

The obtained SHG density of Te2P2O9. Note that the brown, pink, and red atoms are Te, P, and O atoms; and the color and black–white clouds are the veocc and vhunocc SHG densities, respectively.

Conclusions

In this work, the refractive indices, birefringence, and the SHG coefficient of Te2P2O9 were obtained using the first-principles method. The obtained results are in good agreement with the experimental values. The calculated birefringence of Te2P2O9 is 0.12496–0.09236 in the wavelength range of 404.65–1013.61 nm. The maximum SHG tensor d33 is 1.01 pm V−1, which is about 2.6 times that of d36 (KDP). The atomic contribution to the birefringence and SHG response was also investigated using the projected density of states, Born effective charges, and real-space SHG density method. The results show that the TeO5 groups play an important role in determining the birefringence and SHG response of Te2P2O9. The electronic structures and optical response of Ba2TeO(PO4)2 and Te3O3(PO4)2 were also investigated for comparison. The results show these two tellurium phosphates also possess a large birefringence like Te2P2O9. Also, the birefringence originates from the TeO polyhedrons, which was confirmed by the real-space atom-cutting results and distortion indices.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  27 in total

1.  Generation of 5-W deep-UV continuous-wave radiation at 266 nm by an external cavity with a CsLiB6O10 crystal.

Authors:  Jun Sakuma; Yuichi Asakawa; Minoru Obara
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Krukau; Oleg A Vydrov; Artur F Izmaylov; Gustavo E Scuseria
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Tailored synthesis of a nonlinear optical phosphate with a short absorption edge.

Authors:  Sangen Zhao; Pifu Gong; Siyang Luo; Lei Bai; Zheshuai Lin; Yuanyuan Tang; Yuelan Zhou; Maochun Hong; Junhua Luo
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Ultraviolet generation tunable to 0.185 microm in CsLiB6O10.

Authors:  N Umemura; K Kato
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1997-09-20       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  First-principles calculations of Born effective charges and spontaneous polarization of ferroelectric bismuth titanate.

Authors:  Amritendu Roy; Rajendra Prasad; Sushil Auluck; Ashish Garg
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Finding the Next Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Material: NH4B4O6F.

Authors:  Guoqiang Shi; Ying Wang; Fangfang Zhang; Bingbing Zhang; Zhihua Yang; Xueling Hou; Shilie Pan; Kenneth R Poeppelmeier
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Cation-Tuned Synthesis of Fluorooxoborates: Towards Optimal Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Bingbing Zhang; Zhihua Yang; Shilie Pan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: revision of the classical lone pair model.

Authors:  Aron Walsh; David J Payne; Russell G Egdell; Graeme W Watson
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 54.564

9.  Influence of the anion on lone pair formation in Sn(II) monochalcogenides: a DFT study.

Authors:  Aron Walsh; Graeme W Watson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  CsB4 O6 F: A Congruent-Melting Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Material by Combining Superior Functional Units.

Authors:  Xuefei Wang; Ying Wang; Bingbing Zhang; Fangfang Zhang; Zhihua Yang; Shilie Pan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.