| Literature DB >> 35492256 |
Lijuan Zhu1,2,3, Wanfeng Hu1,2,3, Ayesha Murtaza1,2,3, Aamir Iqbal1,2,3, Jiaxing Li1,2,3, Jiao Zhang1,2,3, Junjie Li1,2,3, Mengjie Kong1,2,3, Xiaoyun Xu1,2,3, Siyi Pan1,2,3.
Abstract
The potential mechanism behind the browning inhibition in fresh-cut water chestnuts (FWC) after eugenol (EUG) treatment was investigated by comparing the difference in browning behavior between surface and inner tissues. EUG treatment was found to inactivate browning-related enzymes and reduce phenolic contents in surface tissue. Molecular docking further confirmed the hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding between EUG and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL). Moreover, EUG also enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging enzyme activities, ultimately decreasing the O2 - generation rates. Regarding inner tissue, EUG induced the accumulation of colorless phenolic compounds and increased the antioxidant capacity. In conclusion, 1.5 % EUG exhibited the best inhibitory effect on FWC browning, which partly attribute to the direct inhibitory effects on PAL activity. Furthermore, EUG could also enhance the enzymatic/non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity and alleviate the ROS damage to membranes, thereby, preventing the contact between oxidative enzymes and phenols and indirectly inhibiting the enzymatic browning in FWC.Entities:
Keywords: APX, Ascorbate peroxidase; BI, Browning index; Browning; CAT, Catalase; EUG, Eugenol; Eugenol; FWC, Fresh-cut water chestnut; MDA, Malondialdehyde; MIO, 4-methylidene-imidazole-5-one; Molecular docking; PAL, Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; PBS, Sodium phosphate buffer; POD, Peroxidase; PPO, Polyphenol oxidase; Phenolics metabolism; Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; Reactive oxygen species metabolism; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; T-AOC, Total antioxidant capacities; TPC, Total phenols content; Water chestnut
Year: 2022 PMID: 35492256 PMCID: PMC9043673 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
Fig. 1(A) Color change of fresh-cut water chestnut after eight days of storage: (a) vertical view of water chestnut; (b) side view of water chestnut; (c) vertical view of fresh-cut water chestnut on day 0; (d) profile of fresh-cut water chestnut on day 0; (e) vertical view of control group on day 8; (f) profile of control group on day 8; (g) vertical view of 0.4 % eugenol-treated group on day 8; (h) profile of 0.4 % EUG-treated group on day 8; (i) vertical view of 1.5 % eugenol-treated group on day 8; (j) profile of 1.5 % EUG-treated group on day 8. (B) Changes in browning indexes of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment (0 %, 0.4 % and 1.5 %). (C) Changes in browning indexes of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Different lowercase letters above the bars within the same storage time indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level (t-test).
Fig. 2(A) Changes in polyphenol oxidase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment (0 %, 0.4 % and 1.5 %). (B) Changes in polyphenol oxidase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (C) Changes in peroxidase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (D) Changes in peroxidase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (E) Changes in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (F) Changes in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Different lowercase letters above the bars within the same storage time indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level (t-test).
Fig. 3(A) Changes in total phenols contents of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut (FWC) after eugenol (EUG) treatment (0 %, 0.4 % and 1.5 %). (B) Changes in total phenols contents of inner tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (C) Changes in total-antioxidant capacities of surface tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (D) Changes in total-antioxidant capacities of inner tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (E) Changes in O2− generating rate of surface tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (F) Changes in O2− generating rate of inner tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (G) Changes in malondialdehyde content of surface tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. (H) Changes in malondialdehyde content of inner tissue in FWC after EUG treatment. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Different lowercase letters above the bars within the same storage time indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level (t-test).
Fig. 4(A) Changes in superoxide dismutase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment (0 %, 0.4 % and 1.5 %). (B) Changes in superoxide dismutase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (C) Changes in catalase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (D) Changes in catalase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (E) Changes in ascorbate peroxidase activities of surface tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. (F) Changes in ascorbate peroxidase activities of inner tissue in fresh-cut water chestnut after eugenol treatment. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Different lowercase letters above the bars within the same storage time indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level (t-test).
Fig. 5(A) Three-dimensional map of interaction between eugenol and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL). The blue stick structure represents eugenol while the rest of green structures show the residues of PAL. (B) Two-dimensional ligand interaction map of eugenol docking with PAL. The red circle indicates hydrophobic interaction, and the green dotted line indicates hydrogen bonding. (C) Three-dimensional map of interaction between eugenol and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The purple stick structure represents eugenol while the rest of green structures show the residues of SOD. (D) Two-dimensional ligand interaction map of eugenol docking with SOD. The red circle indicates hydrophobic interaction, and the green dotted line indicates hydrogen bonding.
Fig. 6The possible mechanism of eugenol treatment delaying flesh browning in fresh-cut water chestnut via inhibiting phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity and regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism in surface tissue and inner tissue of fresh-cut water chestnut.