| Literature DB >> 35490230 |
Ran Duan1, Dongyue Lv1, Rong Fan1, Guoming Fu2, Hui Mu1, Jinxiao Xi3, Xinmin Lu4, Hua Chun2, Jun Hua2, Zhaokai He1, Shuai Qin1, Yanyan Huang2, Meng Xiao1, Jinchuan Yang1, Huaiqi Jing1, Xin Wang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human granulocytic anaplasmosis is a tick-borne zoonotic disease caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Coinfections with A. phagocytophilum and other tick-borne pathogens are reported frequently, whereas the relationship between A. phagocytophilum and flea-borne Yersnia pestis is rarely concerned.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum; Anaplasmosis; Coinfection; Marmota himalayana; Plague; Yersinia pestis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35490230 PMCID: PMC9055747 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08557-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Fig. 1M. himalayana infected with A. phagocytophilum and Y. pestis. A and B marmot A and marmot B found shortly after they had died. C Enlarged pulmonary nodules in marmot A
Fig. 2Neighbor-joining trees based on 16S rRNA gene nucleotide and GroEL amino acid sequences. A tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia genera, and on R. rickettsii species. B tree based on GroEL amino acid sequences within the Anaplasma genus
M. himalayana positive for A. phagocytophilum (A. p)
| Marmot | Number of samples | Number of marmots | Number of marmots | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found dead | 29 | 15 | 61 | 24.59% |
| Captured | 37 | 29 | 151 | 19.21% |
| Total | 66 | 44 | 212 | 20.75% |
Y. pestis in dead M. himalayana was isolated more frequently in those bodies harboring A. phagocytophilum*
| + | - | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| + | 10 | 5 | 66.67% |
| 17 | 29 | 36.96% | |
| Total | 27 | 34 | 44.26% |
*χ2 = 4.047, p < 0.05
Fig. 3Polymorphisms of the groEL gene and GroEL protein between marmot-derived A. phagocytophilum. Yellow highlights and red letters: nonsynonymous mutations. * 216 nucleotide mutation confirmed twice by sequences of primary PCR and nested PCR
Fig. 4A. phagocytophilum propagated in L929 cells (A, C) and control cells (B, D). A, B 40X objective (direct observation). C, D oil immersion objective (Giemsa staining)
Fig. 5Genome overview and phylogenetic tree of A. phagocytophilum. A Sequence similarity between marmot-derived A. phagocytophilum (in the center) and other compared strains. The legend shows the GC content and GC skew for the marmot-derived isolate, and the sequence identity on a sliding scale. B: Phylogenetic tree of A. phagocytophilum from various countries and sources
Universal primers for the 16S rRNA gene, and specific primers for the 16S rRNA and groESL genes of A. phagocytophilum, and primers for Y. pestis genes
| Target gene | PCR stage | Primer name | Sequence | Product length | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -a | 27F | AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG | varied | [ | |
| 1492R | TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T | ||||
Primary PCR | Eh-out1 | TTG AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AGA ACG | 653 | [ | |
| Eh-out2 | CAC CTC TAC ACT AGG AAT TCC GCT ATC | ||||
Nested PCR | Eh-gs1 | GTA ATA CT GTA TAA TCC CTG | 282 | ||
| Eh-gs2 | GTA CCG TCA TTA TCT TCC CTA | ||||
| HGA1 | GTC GAA CGG ATT ATT CTT TAT AGC TTG | 389 | |||
| HGA2 | TAT AGG TAC CGT CAT TAT CTT CCC TAC | ||||
Primary PCR | HS1 | TGG GCT GGT A(A/C) TGA AAT | 1431 | [ | |
| HS6 | CCI CCI GGI ACI A(C/T) ACC TTC | ||||
Nested PCR | HS43 | AT(A/T) GC(A/T) AA(G/A) GAA GCA TAG TC | 480 | ||
| HS45 | ACT TCA CG(C/T) (C/T) TCA TAG AC | ||||
| - a | GGAACCACTAGCACATCTGTT | 249 | [ | ||
| ACCTGCTGCAAGTTTACCGCC | |||||
| - a | ACTACGACTGGATGAATGAAAATC | 456 | |||
| GTGACATAATATCCAGCGTTAATT |
astands for conventional PCR