Literature DB >> 35489016

Inside-Out Approach to Meniscus Repair: Still the Gold Standard?

Erick M Marigi1, Sara E Till1, Jory N Wasserburger1, Anna K Reinholz1, Aaron J Krych1, Michael J Stuart2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the current literature and trends regarding use of the inside-out approach to meniscus repair. Additionally, the paper describes the authors preferred techniques for inside-out meniscus repair utilizing posteromedial and posterolateral exposures. RECENT
FINDINGS: There has been a substantial increase in recent publications regarding meniscus repair. However, comparisons regarding the optimal repair technique have not been conclusive. Despite the recent increase in use of all-inside devices, multiple investigations with short-to-mid-term follow-up have demonstrated similar rates of meniscus healing between inside-out and all-inside repair techniques. Similarly, current literature describes comparable failure rates of around 20%. There are variations in the profile of complications, with all-inside devices having more implant-related complications and inside-out techniques with higher neurovascular injuries. Inside-out meniscus repair is a versatile, cost-effective technique that remains the gold standard for management of most meniscus tear patterns. Through a thoughtful approach, efficient suture retrieval and repair can be performed while protecting critical neurovascular structures. All-inside meniscus repair devices have increased in popularity and surgeon access, but this technique is not without limitations and comparisons to inside-out meniscus repair demonstrates equivocal outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inside-out; Meniscus; Meniscus injuries; Meniscus repair; Meniscus repair needles; Meniscus tears

Year:  2022        PMID: 35489016      PMCID: PMC9276857          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09764-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  43 in total

1.  All-inside versus inside-out meniscal repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Helen Vint; Megan Quartley; James R Robinson
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Meniscus morphology: Does tear type matter? A narrative review with focus on relevance for osteoarthritis research.

Authors:  Mohamed Jarraya; Frank W Roemer; Martin Englund; Michel D Crema; Heather I Gale; Daichi Hayashi; Jeffrey N Katz; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Meta-analysis on biomechanical properties of meniscus repairs: are devices better than sutures?

Authors:  Daniel M Buckland; Patrick Sadoghi; Matthias D Wimmer; Patrick Vavken; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano; Claudio Rosso
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Factors Predicting Failure Rates and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Yeo; Fairuz Suhaimi; David A Parker
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees.

Authors:  W D Cannon; J M Vittori
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachariah Gene Wing Ow; Michelle Shi Ni Law; Cheng Han Ng; Aaron J Krych; Daniel B F Saris; Pedro Debieux; Keng Lin Wong; Heng An Lin
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Nineteen percent of meniscus repairs are being revised and failures frequently occur after the second postoperative year: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Conradin Schweizer; Carola Hanreich; Philippe M Tscholl; Robin Ristl; Sebastian Apprich; Reinhard Windhager; Wenzel Waldstein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 8.  Mechanobiology of the meniscus.

Authors:  Amy L McNulty; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Inside-out Medial Meniscal Repair: Improved Surgical Exposure With a Sub-semimembranosus Approach.

Authors:  J Lee Pace; Paul M Inclan; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-01-16

Review 10.  A systematic review about long-term results after meniscus repair.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Katrin Karpinski; Sebastian Bierke; Ralf Müller Rath; Martin Häner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.