Literature DB >> 35488049

Combining cytogenetic and genomic technologies for deciphering challenging complex chromosomal rearrangements.

Rachel Michaelson-Cohen1,2,3, Omer Murik4, Sharon Zeligson5, Orit Lobel5, Omri Weiss6,5, Elie Picard7,8, Tzvia Mann4, Hagar Mor-Shaked7,9, David A Zeevi4, Reeval Segel6,7,5.   

Abstract

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs), a class of structural variants (SVs) involving more than two chromosome breaks, were classically thought to be extremely rare. As advanced technologies become more available, it has become apparent that CCRs are more common than formerly thought, and are a substantial cause of genetic disorders. We attempted a novel approach for solving the mechanism of challenging CCRs, which involve repetitive sequences, by precisely identifying sequence-level changes and their order. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) and FISH analyses were used for interpretation of SVs detected by whole exome sequencing (WES). Breakpoint junctions were analyzed by Nanopore sequencing, a novel long-read whole genome sequencing tool. A large deletion identified by WES, encompassing the FOXF1 enhancer, was the cause of alveolar capillary dysplasia and respiratory insufficiency, resulting in perinatal death. CMA analysis of the newborn's mother revealed two duplications encompassing the deleted region in the proband, raising our hypothesis that the deletion resulted from the mother's CCR. Breakpoint junctions of complex SVs were determined at the nucleotide level using Nanopore long-read sequencing. According to sequencing results of breakpoint junctions, the CCR in the newborn was considered the consequence of at least one double-strand break during meiosis, and reassembly of DNA fragments by intra-chromosomal homologous recombination. Our comprehensive approach, combining cytogenetics and long-read sequencing, enabled delineation of the exact breakpoints in a challenging CCR, and proposal of a mechanism in which it arises. We suggest applying our integrative approach combining technologies for deciphering future challenging CCRs, enabling risk assessment in families.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced genomic technologies; Chromosomal microarray (CMA); Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs); Nanopore long-read sequencing; Whole exome sequencing (WES); Whole genome sequencing (WGS)

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35488049     DOI: 10.1007/s00438-022-01898-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  15 in total

Review 1.  Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations.

Authors:  K Madan; A W Nieuwint; Y van Bever
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior.

Authors:  F Pellestor; T Anahory; G Lefort; J Puechberty; T Liehr; B Hédon; P Sarda
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Analyses of breakpoint junctions of complex genomic rearrangements comprising multiple consecutive microdeletions by nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Taichi Imaizumi; Keiko Yamamoto-Shimojima; Tomoe Yanagishita; Yumiko Ondo; Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Two long homologous retroviral sequence blocks in proximal Yq11 cause AZFa microdeletions as a result of intrachromosomal recombination events.

Authors:  C Kamp; P Hirschmann; H Voss; K Huellen; P H Vogt
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  High spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in ataxia-telangiectasia.

Authors:  M S Meyn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination.

Authors:  H L Klein
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Mechanisms of tandem duplication in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene include both homologous and nonhomologous intrachromosomal recombination.

Authors:  X Y Hu; P N Ray; R G Worton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Mircea Cretu Stancu; Markus J van Roosmalen; Ivo Renkens; Marleen M Nieboer; Sjors Middelkamp; Joep de Ligt; Giulia Pregno; Daniela Giachino; Giorgia Mandrile; Jose Espejo Valle-Inclan; Jerome Korzelius; Ewart de Bruijn; Edwin Cuppen; Michael E Talkowski; Tobias Marschall; Jeroen de Ridder; Wigard P Kloosterman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads.

Authors:  David Heller; Martin Vingron
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation.

Authors:  Bruna Burssed; Malú Zamariolli; Fernanda Teixeira Bellucco; Maria Isabel Melaragno
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Identification of a familial complex chromosomal rearrangement by optical genome mapping.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Wang Hao
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 1.904

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.