Literature DB >> 35487047

Psychiatric disorders newly diagnosed among veterans subsequent to hospitalization for COVID-19.

Jason I Chen1, Alex Hickok2, Allison C O'Neill2, Meike Niederhausen3, Avery Z Laliberte4, Diana J Govier2, Samuel T Edwards5, Howard S Gordon6, Christopher G Slatore7, Francis M Weaver8, Rebecca Young2, Denise M Hynes9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to evaluate the development of new mental health diagnoses up to 6-months following COVID-19 hospitalization for in a large, national sample.
METHOD: Data were extracted for all Veterans hospitalized at Veterans Health Administration hospitals for COVID-19 from March through August of 2020 utilizing national administrative data. After identifying the cohort, follow-up data were linked through six months post-hospitalization. Data were analyzed using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Eight percent of patients developed a new mental health diagnosis following hospitalization. The most common new mental health diagnoses involved depressive, anxiety, and adjustment disorders. Younger and rural patients were more likely to develop new mental health diagnoses. Women and those with more comorbidities were less likely to develop new diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: A subpopulation of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 developed new mental health diagnoses. Unique demographics predictors indicate the potential need for additional outreach and screening to groups at elevated risk of post-hospitalization, mental health sequelae.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covid-19; Intensive care; Mental health; Military veterans

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35487047      PMCID: PMC9023376          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   11.225


Introduction

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, over four million patients have been hospitalized for COVID-19 (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). Although some research has evaluated the mental health (MH) impact of contracting COVID-19, there remain limited data available on how hospitalization affects MH distress (Taquet et al., 2021). Much is unknown about whether COVID-19 hospitalization contributes to the development of new MH conditions. The extant literature finds that hospitalization involving invasive procedures is associated with increased mental health symptoms (Wade et al., 2013). Veterans may be at elevated risk of negative MH outcomes due to their higher prevalence of trauma and other risk factors (Trivedi et al., 2015). However, a recent systematic review shows unclear evidence for the association between COVID-19 hospitalization and MH outcomes (Veazie et al., 2021). The objectives of the current paper are to: (1) Evaluate the development of new MH conditions over time among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 using a large, national dataset; (2) Explore demographic (e.g., age) and clinical predictors (e.g., comorbidities) of developing new MH conditions post-COVID-19 hospitalization to inform tailored prevention efforts.

Methods

We extracted data for all Veteran patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 between 3/2020–8/2020 using the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) COVID-19: Shared Data Resource, which contains variables on COVID-19 hospitalization and comorbidities derived from multiple data sources.(VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, 2020) We chose this time frame to ensure sufficient longitudinal data to evaluate the development of new MH conditions up to six months post-hospitalization through March 2021. We excluded patients who died during hospitalization (n= 1158) or within 6 months of discharge (n= 715), or were missing covariate information (n= 95) for a final sample of 3518 (see Table). We then linked data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, a collection of diagnostic and clinical encounter data capturing information for all VHA patients. We operationalized development of new MH conditions based on whether a Veteran had been diagnosed with the condition within two years prior to hospitalization. We analyzed the odds ratios of developing new MH conditions using a logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, length of hospitalization, ventilator use, body mass index, smoking history, marital status, rurality, Elixhauser score (i.e., comorbidity index), and mental health care utilization (pre- and post-hospitalization) (Moore et al., 2017). We chose the Elixhauser score as our comorbidity index due to past research supporting its utility as a predictor of re-admission and mortality following hospitalization (Moore et al., 2017). Relative model fit was evaluated using standard metrics (e.g., Akaike Information Criterion). All analyses were conducted with R version 4.0.2 (R Development Core Team, 2021).

Results

Prior to hospitalization, 61% of our sample had a mental health diagnosis. The most common, pre-hospitalization MH conditions were depressive disorders (40%), anxiety disorders (23%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (22%). Eight percent developed a new MH diagnosis with the most common new MH diagnoses being depressive (28%), anxiety (28%), and adjustment disorders (24%). Seventeen percent of patients had a new diagnosis of PTSD. Among patients with a new MH diagnosis, 64% had an existing comorbid MH diagnosis (e.g., prior diagnosis of depression but a new diagnosis of alcohol use disorder; see Supplemental Table 1). We found patients aged <45 years (OR = 1.56, p = .05) or 55–64 years (OR = 1.61, p < .01) were more likely to develop new MH conditions compared to those >=65 as well as those who lived in rural areas (OR = 1.49, p < .05) compared to those in urban areas. Women were less likely than men to develop a new MH condition (OR = 0.56, p < .05). As Elixhauser scores increased, the odds of new MH conditions decreased (OR = 0.99, p < .001; see Table 1 ). We found no significant interaction effects with race, gender, and MH care engagement in our exploratory analyses. We found no significant associations with other demographics and clinical variables. Mechanical ventilation was associated with increased odds of a new MH diagnosis but was not statistically significant (OR = 1.58, p = .06).
Table 1

Sample characteristics by new mental health diagnosis status.

New Mental Health Diagnosis Status
OverallNoYes
N= 3518N = 3241N= 277OR (95% CI)P value
Age (mean (SD))64.33 (14.78)64.71 (14.65)59.78 (15.58)
Age Category (%)
65+1936 (55.0)1824 (56.3)112 (40.4)RefRef
55–64746 (21.2)671 (20.7)75 (27.1)1.61 (1.13 - 2.29)0.008
45–54466 (13.2)424 (13.1)42 (15.2)1.31 (0.85 - 2.03)0.22
<45370 (10.5)322 (9.9)48 (17.3)1.56 (1.00 - 2.44)0.05
Gender, Male/Female (%)
Female263 (7.5)246 (7.6)17 (6.1)0.56 (0.33 - 0.97)0.04
Race (%)
White1649 (46.9)1520 (46.9)129 (46.6)RefRef
Black1448 (41.2)1331 (41.1)117 (42.2)1.04 (0.77 - 1.41)0.78
Multiracial156 (4.4)146 (4.5)10 (3.6)0.90 (0.44 - 1.83)0.77
Other/Unknown265 (7.5)244 (7.5)21 (7.6)1.10 (0.63 - 1.90)0.74
Ethnicity, Non-Hispanic/Hispanic (%)
Hispanic/Latino352 (10.0)314 (9.7)38 (13.7)1.31 (0.86 - 2.00)0.21
Length of Stay (mean (SD))9.67 (13.42)9.67 (13.44)9.66 (13.22)1.00 (0.99 - 1.01)0.74
Ventilator Use, Yes/No (%)
Yes256 (7.3)223 (6.9)33 (11.9)1.58 (0.98 - 2.56)0.06
BMI* (mean (SD))30.26 (7.34)30.17 (7.43)31.39 (6.20)1.01 (0.99 - 1.03)0.52
Smoking, Never/Ever (%)
Ever1730 (49.2)1594 (49.2)136 (49.1)0.96 (0.73 - 1.27)0.77
Marital Status, Married/Single or Other (%)
Single/Other2108 (59.9)1942 (59.9)166 (59.9)0.97 (0.74 - 1.28)0.84
Rurality, Urban/Rural (%)
Rural581 (16.5)528 (16.3)53 (19.1)1.49 (1.05 - 2.13)0.03
Elixhauser Score (mean (SD))36.62 (28.19)36.98 (28.48)32.40 (24.24)0.99 (0.98 - 1.00)<0.001
Any MH Use, 2-yr Prior/6-mo Post (%)
No/No1553 (44.1)1519 (46.9)34 (12.3)RefRef
No/Yes234 (6.7)152 (4.7)82 (29.6)26.13 (16.74 - 40.81)<0.001
Yes/No738 (21.0)721 (22.2)17 (6.1)1.22 (0.67 - 2.21)0.52
Yes/Yes993 (28.2)849 (26.2)144 (52.0)9.27 (6.19 - 13.87)<0.001

Body Mass Index.

Mental Health.

Sample characteristics by new mental health diagnosis status. Body Mass Index. Mental Health.

Discussion

Our findings show that a proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 developed new MH diagnoses (8%) (Trivedi et al., 2015). These results reflect the extant literature showing significant mental health morbidity following medical hospitalization (Xie et al., 2022). Depressive disorders were the most common new MH condition. When considering specific predictors, age and rurality were associated with increased likelihood of developing a new MH condition. It is unsurprising that younger age groups showed increased risk, as MH conditions generally onset prior to 50 years of age (Solmi et al., 2021). In terms of rural dwelling patients, there may be more limited access to MH prevention resources increasing likelihood of distress. Clinicians may consider implementing additional MH prevention and intervention measures (e.g., screening, offering outpatient MH care) to mitigate MH morbidity post-COVID-19 hospitalization. Patients who had no history of MH care in the past two years were more likely to have a new MH diagnosis following hospitalization. It is possible that these patients had undetected MH diagnoses due to lack of engagement in MH care. These patients may also have had fewer existing MH coping resources leading to increased likelihood of negative MH sequelae following hospitalization. Unexpectedly, higher Elixhauser scores were associated with decreased likelihood of developing a new MH condition. However, this association appears secondary to inclusion of MH conditions as part of the Elixhauser formula (Moore et al., 2017). This is further supported by an additional sensitivity analysis performed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index which does not contain MH diagnoses (see Supplemental Table 2) and had no association with the development of new MH diagnoses (Charlson et al., 1987). The current study evaluated the longitudinal association between COVID-19 hospitalization and the development of new MH conditions using a large, national sample. As this was an observational study, it is not possible to infer causation from our findings. In addition, we are unable to determine the degree which the prevalence of new MH conditions in our sample differs from the general population. Due to data limitations, we could not evaluate additional variables of interest such as social support and changes in post-hospitalization care sought outside the VA, which may inform MH trajectories. Although past research finds an increased incidence of PTSD following hospitalization especially within the context of mechanical ventilation, only 17% of our sample had a new diagnosis of PTSD limiting our ability to explore unique associations with specific MH diagnoses (Hatch et al., 2018). Future research should consider exploring social and clinical variables and care sought outside the VA to identify modifiable risk factors as well as those specific to individual MH diagnoses to prevent post-hospitalization MH distress.

Author note

This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report having no conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript.
  8 in total

1.  Identifying Increased Risk of Readmission and In-hospital Mortality Using Hospital Administrative Data: The AHRQ Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.

Authors:  Brian J Moore; Susan White; Raynard Washington; Natalia Coenen; Anne Elixhauser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Prevalence, Comorbidity, and Prognosis of Mental Health Among US Veterans.

Authors:  Ranak B Trivedi; Edward P Post; Haili Sun; Andrew Pomerantz; Andrew J Saxon; John D Piette; Charles Maynard; Bruce Arnow; Idamay Curtis; Stephan D Fihn; Karin Nelson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Identifying clinical and acute psychological risk factors for PTSD after critical care: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Wade; R Hardy; D Howell; M Mythen
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: a UK-wide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert Hatch; Duncan Young; Vicki Barber; John Griffiths; David A Harrison; Peter Watkinson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA.

Authors:  Maxime Taquet; Sierra Luciano; John R Geddes; Paul J Harrison
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 27.083

7.  Risks of mental health outcomes in people with covid-19: cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Xie; Evan Xu; Ziyad Al-Aly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 8.  Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Marco Solmi; Joaquim Radua; Miriam Olivola; Enrico Croce; Livia Soardo; Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Jae Il Shin; James B Kirkbride; Peter Jones; Jae Han Kim; Jong Yeob Kim; Andrè F Carvalho; Mary V Seeman; Christoph U Correll; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 15.992

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.