Literature DB >> 35485309

Control of innate immunity by the cGAS-STING pathway.

Kenta Mosallanejad1, Jonathan C Kagan1.   

Abstract

Within the cytoplasm of mammalian cells is a protein called cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), which acts to defend against infection and other threats to the host. cGAS operates in this manner through its ability to detect a molecular occurrence that should not exist in healthy cells - the existence of DNA in the cytosol. Upon DNA binding, cGAS synthesizes cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), a cyclic dinucleotide that activates the endoplasmic reticulum-localized protein stimulator of interferon genes (STING). STING-mediated signaling culminates in host defensive responses typified by inflammatory cytokine and interferon expression, and the induction of autophagy. Studies over the past several years have established a consensus in the field of the enzymatic activities of cGAS in vitro, as it relates to DNA-induced production of cGAMP. However, much additional work is needed to understand the regulation of cGAS functions within cells, where multiple sources of DNA can create a problem of self and non-self discrimination. In this review, we provide an overview of how the cGAS-STING pathway mediates innate immune responses during infection and other cellular stresses. We then highlight recent progress in the understanding of the increasingly diverse ways in which this DNA-sensing machinery is regulated inside cells, including how cGAS remains inactive to host-derived DNA under conditions of homeostasis.
© 2022 Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STING; antiviral response; cGAS; innate immune system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35485309      PMCID: PMC9250635          DOI: 10.1111/imcb.12555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0818-9641            Impact factor:   5.853


  143 in total

1.  Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria.

Authors:  Volker Brinkmann; Ulrike Reichard; Christian Goosmann; Beatrix Fauler; Yvonne Uhlemann; David S Weiss; Yvette Weinrauch; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  PQBP1 Is a Proximal Sensor of the cGAS-Dependent Innate Response to HIV-1.

Authors:  Janna Seifried; Stephen Soonthornvacharin; Sunnie M Yoh; Monika Schneider; Rana E Akleh; Kevin C Olivieri; Paul D De Jesus; Chunhai Ruan; Elisa de Castro; Pedro A Ruiz; David Germanaud; Vincent des Portes; Adolfo García-Sastre; Renate König; Sumit K Chanda
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  cGAS and Ifi204 cooperate to produce type I IFNs in response to Francisella infection.

Authors:  Kelly M Storek; Nina A Gertsvolf; Maikke B Ohlson; Denise M Monack
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Structure of the Human cGAS-DNA Complex Reveals Enhanced Control of Immune Surveillance.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Aaron T Whiteley; Carina C de Oliveira Mann; Benjamin R Morehouse; Radosław P Nowak; Eric S Fischer; Nathanael S Gray; John J Mekalanos; Philip J Kranzusch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Mn2+ Directly Activates cGAS and Structural Analysis Suggests Mn2+ Induces a Noncanonical Catalytic Synthesis of 2'3'-cGAMP.

Authors:  Zhen Zhao; Zhixing Ma; Bo Wang; Yukun Guan; Xiao-Dong Su; Zhengfan Jiang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  cGAS phase separation inhibits TREX1-mediated DNA degradation and enhances cytosolic DNA sensing.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Lisa Mohr; John Maciejowski; Philip J Kranzusch
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  The N-Terminal Domain of cGAS Determines Preferential Association with Centromeric DNA and Innate Immune Activation in the Nucleus.

Authors:  Matteo Gentili; Xavier Lahaye; Francesca Nadalin; Guilherme P F Nader; Emilia Puig Lombardi; Solène Herve; Nilushi S De Silva; Derek C Rookhuizen; Elina Zueva; Christel Goudot; Mathieu Maurin; Aurore Bochnakian; Sebastian Amigorena; Matthieu Piel; Daniele Fachinetti; Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Nicolas Manel
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Human cytomegalovirus protein UL42 antagonizes cGAS/MITA-mediated innate antiviral response.

Authors:  Yu-Zhi Fu; Yi Guo; Hong-Mei Zou; Shan Su; Su-Yun Wang; Qing Yang; Min-Hua Luo; Yan-Yi Wang
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Tight nuclear tethering of cGAS is essential for preventing autoreactivity.

Authors:  Hannah E Volkman; Stephanie Cambier; Elizabeth E Gray; Daniel B Stetson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response.

Authors:  A Phillip West; William Khoury-Hanold; Matthew Staron; Michal C Tal; Cristiana M Pineda; Sabine M Lang; Megan Bestwick; Brett A Duguay; Nuno Raimundo; Donna A MacDuff; Susan M Kaech; James R Smiley; Robert E Means; Akiko Iwasaki; Gerald S Shadel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.