Patricia Triece1, Alessandro Massazza1, Daniela C Fuhr2. 1. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. 2. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. daniela.fuhr@lshtm.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This review aimed to evaluate interventions led by peer counselors (PCs) for adults with common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) along indices of overall effectiveness and key implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, cost, fidelity, sustainability). METHODS: This review followed a mixed-methods systematic review design. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Health databases were searched for PC-led interventions for adults in LMICs targeting depressive and/or anxiety disorders or PTSD. Quantitative data was narratively synthesized, and qualitative data was thematically synthesized separately. The results from the qualitative and quantitative syntheses were then combined in a cross-study synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty-four papers describing thirteen PC-led interventions were included for review. Narrative synthesis results indicated mixed effectiveness of PC-led interventions in reducing depressive, anxiety, PTSD symptoms and high PC competency. Thematic synthesis revealed five descriptive themes: (1) Preferred PC characteristics; (2) Incentives and motivation for PCs; (3) Barriers to PC-led intervention implementation; (4) Helpful supervision/training practices; and (5) Overall high acceptability of PC-led interventions. Cross-study synthesis revealed high acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity, but cost and sustainability outcomes were underreported in included papers. CONCLUSION: PC-led interventions seem to show initial promise in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, cost, fidelity, and sustainability. Future research should focus on standardizing measurements of implementation outcomes to facilitate cross-study analysis. Additional empirical attention should be paid to underrepresented implementation outcomes (e.g., cost, sustainability). Finally, researchers should adopt a participatory approach that elevates the perspectives of PCs throughout all stages of the implementation process.
PURPOSE: This review aimed to evaluate interventions led by peer counselors (PCs) for adults with common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) along indices of overall effectiveness and key implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, cost, fidelity, sustainability). METHODS: This review followed a mixed-methods systematic review design. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Health databases were searched for PC-led interventions for adults in LMICs targeting depressive and/or anxiety disorders or PTSD. Quantitative data was narratively synthesized, and qualitative data was thematically synthesized separately. The results from the qualitative and quantitative syntheses were then combined in a cross-study synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty-four papers describing thirteen PC-led interventions were included for review. Narrative synthesis results indicated mixed effectiveness of PC-led interventions in reducing depressive, anxiety, PTSD symptoms and high PC competency. Thematic synthesis revealed five descriptive themes: (1) Preferred PC characteristics; (2) Incentives and motivation for PCs; (3) Barriers to PC-led intervention implementation; (4) Helpful supervision/training practices; and (5) Overall high acceptability of PC-led interventions. Cross-study synthesis revealed high acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity, but cost and sustainability outcomes were underreported in included papers. CONCLUSION: PC-led interventions seem to show initial promise in terms of effectiveness, acceptability, feasibility, cost, fidelity, and sustainability. Future research should focus on standardizing measurements of implementation outcomes to facilitate cross-study analysis. Additional empirical attention should be paid to underrepresented implementation outcomes (e.g., cost, sustainability). Finally, researchers should adopt a participatory approach that elevates the perspectives of PCs throughout all stages of the implementation process.
Authors: Ritsuko Kakuma; Harry Minas; Nadja van Ginneken; Mario R Dal Poz; Keshav Desiraju; Jodi E Morris; Shekhar Saxena; Richard M Scheffler Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-10-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Vikram Patel; Mario Maj; Alan J Flisher; Mary J De Silva; Mirja Koschorke; Martin Prince Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: K C Koenen; A Ratanatharathorn; L Ng; K A McLaughlin; E J Bromet; D J Stein; E G Karam; A Meron Ruscio; C Benjet; K Scott; L Atwoli; M Petukhova; C C W Lim; S Aguilar-Gaxiola; A Al-Hamzawi; J Alonso; B Bunting; M Ciutan; G de Girolamo; L Degenhardt; O Gureje; J M Haro; Y Huang; N Kawakami; S Lee; F Navarro-Mateu; B-E Pennell; M Piazza; N Sampson; M Ten Have; Y Torres; M C Viana; D Williams; M Xavier; R C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Linda M Richter; Alastair van Heerden; Heidi van Rooyen; Mark Tomlinson; Jessica M Harwood; W Scott Comulada; Alan Stein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240