Literature DB >> 35484411

Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.

Ruochen Niu1,2, Haitao Liu3.   

Abstract

We conducted a broad-coverage investigation of the effects of syntactic distance and word order on language processing against a dependency-annotated reading time corpus of English. A combined method of quantitative syntax and psycholinguistic analyses was adopted to yield converging evidence. It was found that (i) head-initial structures allow greater structural complexity, i.e., larger head-dependent distance, than head-final structures in both language comprehension and production; (ii) within the capacity limit of working memory, syntactic distance is a positive predictor of reading time for a word with a preceding head, whereas a negative predictor of reading time for a word with a following head; and (iii) at the sentence level, syntactic distance is a significant predictor of sentence reading time. These results suggest that (i) different word orders may enjoy different processing mechanisms in terms of cognitive difficulty and processes, which can be explained by an incremental language parser; and (ii) in addition to distance, word order should also be considered as a factor affecting language processing, which is an important extension to distance-based language processing models. Taken as a whole, our study paves the way for corpus-based integration of quantitative linguistic and psycholinguistic methods into understanding language processing and its underlying cognitive mechanisms.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dependency direction; Dependency distance; Processing complexity; Psycholinguistic corpus; Syntactic processing

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35484411     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  15 in total

1.  Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages.

Authors:  Richard Futrell; Kyle Mahowald; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Richard L Lewis; Shravan Vasishth; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity.

Authors:  Vera Demberg; Frank Keller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-18

Review 4.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

5.  Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity.

Authors:  Daniel Grodner; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-03-04

6.  Do grammars minimize dependency length?

Authors:  Daniel Gildea; David Temperley
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-10-27

7.  Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.

Authors:  Laura Winther Balling; Johannes Kizach
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

8.  Language as a human-driven complex adaptive system: Comment on "Rethinking foundations of language from a multidisciplinary perspective" by T. Gong et al.

Authors:  Haitao Liu
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Optimality of syntactic dependency distances.

Authors:  Ramon Ferrer-I-Cancho; Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez; Juan Luis Esteban; Lluís Alemany-Puig
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.529

10.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Evelina Fedorenko; Edward Gibson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.