Literature DB >> 35484338

Volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis of the testes in nonobstructive azoospermia: a noninvasive fingerprint of impaired spermatogenesis?

Athina C Tsili1, Loukas G Astrakas2, Anna C Goussia3, Nikolaos Sofikitis4, Maria I Argyropoulou5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between testicular volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis metrics and histologic categories in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). The role of ADC histogram analysis in predicting the presence of spermatozoa, prior to testicular sperm extraction (TESE), was also investigated.
METHODS: Forty-one NOA men and 17 age-matched controls underwent scrotal MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. Histogram analysis of ADC data of the whole testis was performed. Metrics including mean, standard deviation, median, mode, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy of volumetric ADC histograms were calculated. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to assess differences in ADC histogram parameters between NOA histologic categories (hypospermatogenesis, severe hypospermatogenesis, early maturation arrest, and Sertoli cell-only syndrome) and normal testes and, between NOA with positive and negative sperm retrieval.
RESULTS: Normal testes had a lower mean, median, mode, 25th percentile (p < 0.001), and 75th percentile of ADC (p = 0.001), compared to NOA histologic phenotypes. NOA with hypospermatogenesis had a lower 25th percentile of ADC compared to NOA with severe hypospermatogenesis. Regression analysis revealed that the 25th percentile of ADC had a moderately negative correlation with NOA histologic phenotype. The median ADC proved the most significant metric (p = 0.007) to predict the presence of sperm.
CONCLUSIONS: Testicular volumetric ADC histogram parameters may contribute in the identification of the subpopulation of NOA men with a specific type of spermatogenic arrest. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric ADC histogram analysis metrics may be used as noninvasive markers of impaired spermatogenesis in nonobstructive azoospermia. • The 25th percentile of ADC proved useful in discriminating between NOA testes with hypospermatogenesis and severe hypospermatogenesis. • The median ADC proved the most significant parameter to predict the presence of viable spermatozoa prior to TESE.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azoospermia; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Sperm retrieval; Spermatozoa; Testis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35484338     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08817-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  41 in total

Review 1.  Testicular Mapping: A Roadmap to Sperm Retrieval in Nonobstructive Azoospermia?

Authors:  Akash A Kapadia; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Male factor infertility trends throughout the last 10 years: Report from a tertiary-referral academic andrology centre.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fallara; Walter Cazzaniga; Luca Boeri; Paolo Capogrosso; Luigi Candela; Edoardo Pozzi; Federico Belladelli; Nicolò Schifano; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Costantino Abbate; Enrico Papaleo; Paola Viganò; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Salonia
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 3.  Predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature.

Authors:  Muhammad A Arshad; Ahmad Majzoub; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Corona; Suks Minhas; Aleksander Giwercman; Carlo Bettocchi; Marij Dinkelman-Smit; Gert Dohle; Ferdinando Fusco; Ates Kadioglou; Sabine Kliesch; Zsolt Kopa; Csilla Krausz; Fiore Pelliccione; Alessandro Pizzocaro; Jens Rassweiler; Paolo Verze; Linda Vignozzi; Wolfgang Weidner; Mario Maggi; Nikolaos Sofikitis
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  Non-obstructive azoospermia: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Tharu Tharakan; Rong Luo; Channa N Jayasena; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-01-26

6.  Sperm retrieval success and testicular histopathology in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Arighno Das; Joshua A Halpern; Annie L Darves-Bornoz; Mehul Patel; James Wren; Mary Kate Keeter; Robert E Brannigan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Predictors of testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a review.

Authors:  Lin Qi; Ya P Liu; Nan N Zhang; Ying C Su
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?

Authors:  Ettore Caroppo; Giovanni Maria Colpi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Ettore Caroppo; Fabrizio Castiglioni; Cristina Campagna; Elisabetta M Colpi; Elisabetta Piatti; Giacomo Gazzano; Giovanni M Colpi
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 10.  Review of Azoospermia.

Authors:  Matthew Wosnitzer; Marc Goldstein; Matthew P Hardy
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.