| Literature DB >> 35484175 |
Donogh Maguire1,2, Alana Burns3, Dinesh Talwar4, Anthony Catchpole4, Fiona Stefanowicz4, David P Ross5, Peter Galloway3, Alastair Ireland5, Gordon Robson5, Michael Adamson5, Lesley Orr5, Joanna-Lee Kerr5, Xenofon Roussis5, Eoghan Colgan5, Ewan Forrest6, David Young7, Donald C McMillan8.
Abstract
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) occurs in 2% of patients admitted to U.K. hospitals. Routine treatment includes thiamine and benzodiazepines. Laboratory studies indicate that thiamine requires magnesium for optimal activity, however this has not translated into clinical practice. Patients experiencing AWS were randomized to three groups: (group 1) thiamine, (group 2) thiamine plus MgSO4 or (group 3) MgSO4. Pre- and 2-h post-treatment blood samples were taken. AWS severity was recorded using the Glasgow Modified Alcohol Withdrawal Score (GMAWS). The primary outcome measure was 15% change in erythrocyte transketolase activity (ETKA) in group 3. Secondary outcome measures were change in plasma lactate concentrations and time to GMAWS = 0. 127 patients were recruited, 115 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Pre-treatment, the majority of patients had normal or high erythrocyte thiamine diphosphate (TDP) concentrations (≥ 275-675/> 675 ng/gHb respectively) (99%), low serum magnesium concentrations (< 0.75 mmol/L) (59%), and high plasma lactate concentrations (> 2 mmol/L) (67%). Basal ETKA did not change significantly in groups 1, 2 or 3. Magnesium deficient patients (< 0.75 mmol/L) demonstrated less correlation between pre-treatment basal ETKA and TDP concentrations than normomagnesemic patients (R2 = 0.053 and R2 = 0.236). Median plasma lactate concentrations normalized (≤ 2.0 mmol/L) across all three groups (p < 0.001 for all groups), but not among magnesium deficient patients in group 1 (n = 22). The median time to achieve GMAWS = 0 for groups 1, 2 and 3 was 10, 5.5 and 6 h respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between groups for the primary endpoint of change in ETKA. Co-administration of thiamine and magnesium resulted in more consistent normalization of plasma lactate concentrations and reduced duration to achieve initial resolution of AWS symptoms.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03466528.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35484175 PMCID: PMC9051209 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10970-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Pseudo-hypoxic ‘Dirty burn’ metabolism resulting in increased lactate production during AWS.
Baseline characteristics of patients recruited to the randomised controlled trial (n = 115).
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (< 50 /≥ 50 years) | 27/11 | 19/18 | 27/13 | 0.766 |
| Male/female | 26/12 | 30/7 | 32/8 | 0.234 |
| BMI (< 20 /≥ 20–< 30/≥ 30 kg/m) | 9/23/6 | 6/26/5 | 6/31/3 | 0.112 |
| Recent weight loss (Yes/No) | 23/12 | 30/6 | 25/12 | 0.884 |
| Gait disturbance (Yes/No) | 32/5 | 33/4 | 30/10 | 0.170 |
| Alcohol intakeb (U/week) | 210 (126–280) | 210 (144–290) | 150 (112–280) | 0.424 |
| Smoker (Yes/No) | 28/9 | 29/7 | 27/12 | 0.510 |
| FAST (< 9/≥ 9) | 1/34 | 2/30 | 2/35 | 0.620 |
| GMAWS (at presentation) | 4 (2–4) | 4 (3–5) | 4 (3–4) | 0.192 |
| GMAWS (at presentation) (< 4 /≥ 4) | 17/20 | 13/23 | 19/19 | 0.718 |
| GMAWS (max) | 4 (3–6) | 5 (3–6) | 4 (2–5) | 0.202 |
| GMAWS max (< 4 /≥ 4) | 13/25 | 9/27 | 17/23 | 0.431 |
| BDZ total (mg) | 140 (38–284) | 160 (50–260) | 130 (50–240) | 0.785 |
| BDZ total (< 120 /≥ 120 mg) | 16/18 | 15/20 | 19/21 | 0.954 |
| Time to GMAWS = 0 (h) | 10 (6–18) | 5.5 (3–8) | 6 (3–9) | < 0.001 |
| BDZ to GMAWS = 0 (Diazepam (mg)) | 50 (38–105) | 40 (30–70) | 35 (30–70) | 0.060 |
| Thiamine (yes/no) | 32/6 | 30/6 | 26/13 | 0.064 |
| Magnesium (yes/no) | 1/35 | 2/32 | 5/34 | 0.096 |
| PPi (yes/no) | 27/10 | 19/17 | 22/17 | 0.146 |
| H2 Blocker (yes/no) | 2/33 | 2/32 | 1/36 | 0.545 |
| ED presentation within 1 month (yes/no) | 10/27 | 9/26 | 7/32 | 0.350 |
| ED presentations within 12 months | 3 (1–9) | 3 (1–5) | 2 (1–5) | 0.779 |
| Total number of admissions | 14 (5–42) | 14 (8–34) | 17 (6–29) | 0.982 |
Continuous data are presented as median and interquartile range (parentheses).
aCategorical and continuous data were analysed with Chi-squared and Kruksall-Wallis tests respectively.
bGroup 1: n = 19; Group 2: n = 16; Group 3: n = 21.
(a) Pre- and post- treatment laboratory results for randomisation groups (n = 115), (b) Sensitivity analysis: Pre- and post- treatment laboratory results according to randomisation groups for patients receiving long-term treatment with oral thiamine supplementation prior to recruitment (n = 88).
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 1/20/17 | 0/22/14 | 0/24/12 | 0.263 |
| 631 (460–929) | 644 (553–815) | 577 (453–764) | 0.302 | |
| Post | 0/1/30** | 0/2/33** | 0/24/12 | < 0.001 |
| 1056 (895–1213) | 1066 (908–1186) | 564 (435–789) | < 0.001 | |
| Pre | 31/6 | 25/9 | 30/9 | 0.478 |
| 7.4 (6.7–7.6) | 7.2 (6.5–7.7) | 7.3 (6.7–7.9) | 0.901 | |
| Post | 28/4 | 25/8 | 28/8 | 0.331 |
| 7.5 (6.6–7.7) | 7.2 (6.5–7.7) | 7.3 (6.5–7.9) | 0.765 | |
| Pre | 15/23 | 14/20 | 17/22 | 0.715 |
| 0.71 (0.56–0.78) | 0.71 (0.62–0.81) | 0.70 (0.62–0.81) | 0.605 | |
| Post | 12/21 | 29/4** | 30/4** | < 0.001 |
| 0.67 (0.54–0.79) | 0.96 (0.88–1.1) | 0.92 (0.85–1.0) | < 0.001 | |
| Pre | 0.66 (0.54–0.76) | 0.65 (0.47–0.82) | 0.62 (0.50–0.73) | 0.442 |
| Post | 0.76 (0.56–0.93) | 0.60 (0.51–0.84) | 0.63 (0.51–0.71) | 0.102 |
| Pre | 24/10 | 17/14 | 19/15 | 0.217 |
| Post | 24/8 | 17/14 | 23/11 | 0.549 |
| Pre | 0.60 (0.49–0.68) | 0.58 (0.46–0.74) | 0.57 (0.46–0.69) | 0.819 |
| Post | 0.67 (0.49–0.78) | 0.57 (0.49–0.71) | 0.61 (0.47–0.72) | 0.484 |
| Pre | 29/2 | 23/5 | 29/4 | 0.500 |
| Post | 29/1 | 24/4 | 29/4 | 0.256 |
| Pre | 26/12 | 24/10 | 26/14 | 0.743 |
| 6.1 (5.4–7.6) | 6.1 (5.4–7.6) | 5.9 (4.9–7.8) | 0.782 | |
| Post | 20/7 | 24/8 | 26/8 | 0.828 |
| 5.8 (4.9–7.0) | 5.9 (5.2–7.0) | 5.6 (4.9–6.9) | 0.510 | |
| Pre | 6/16 | 10/10 | 11/16 | 0.375 |
| 302 (233–380) | 233 (203–309) | 251 (217–328) | 0.141 | |
| Post | 8/13 | 11/11 | 13/12 | 0.359 |
| 264 (202–297) | 238 (198–278) | 236 (209–295) | 0.825 | |
| Pre | 14/23 | 10/26 | 14/26 | 0.808 |
| 2.4 (1.5–4.5) | 2.9 (1.7–4.9) | 2.7 (1.6–4.4) | 0.834 | |
| Post | 19/15 | 26/9** | 22/16* | 0.904 |
| 1.5 (1.1–3.3) | 1.2 (0.9–2.4) | 1.8 (1.1–2.7) | 0.384 | |
| Pre | 14/13/4 | 12/17/3 | 9/25/0 | 0.004 |
| 36 (32–39) | 37 (31–40) | 38 (34–40) | 0.344 | |
| Post | 9/12/2 | 8/21/1 | 4/26/0 | 0.004 |
| 36 (32–40) | 38 (32–41) | 40 (38–42) | 0.018 | |
| Pre | 3/21/9 | 2/17/13 | 1/25/9 | 0.658 |
| 29 (25–31) | 29 (25–34) | 26 (24–31) | 0.259 | |
| Post | 1/13/9 | 1/13/16 | 1/19/10 | 0.558 |
| 29 (26–33) | 31 (27–33) | 26 (24–30) | 0.029 | |
aCategorical and continuous data were analysed with Chi-squared and Kruksall-Wallis tests respectively.
*,**Changes between pre- and post- treatment measurements with significance p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively as calculated by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test.
***Changes between pre- and post- treatment measurements with significance p < 0.001 as calculated by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test.
Figure 2Pre- and post-treatment erythrocyte thiamine diphosphate concentrations.
Figure 3Pre- and post-treatment serum magnesium concentrations according to randomisation.
Figure 4Pre- and post-treatment basal ETKA (n = 93).
Inter-group differences between pre- and post-treatment ETKA according to randomisation.
| (I) Randomisation | (J) Randomisation | Mean difference (I–J) | SE | Sig | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
| 1 | 3 | 0.11541 | 0.04955 | 0.041 | 0.0040 | 0.2268 |
| 2 | 3 | 0.04964 | 0.04996 | 0.511 | − 0.0627 | 0.1619 |
One-way ANOVA Dunnett t-test for inter-group differences, treating group 3 as control, and comparing groups 1 and 2 against it.
Figure 5(a) Pre-treatment basal ETKA versus pre-treatment erythrocyte TDP with pre-treatment magnesium status highlighted (n = 97), (b) Post-treatment basal ETKA versus post treatment erythrocyte TDP with post-treatment magnesium status highlighted (n = 96).
Figure 6(a) Group 1 post-treatment basal ETKA versus erythrocyte TDP (n = 33), (b) Group 2 post-treatment basal ETKA versus erythrocyte TDP (n = 31), (c) Group 3 post-treatment basal ETKA versus erythrocyte TDP (n = 32).
Figure 7Pre- and post-treatment plasma lactate (all patients).
Pre- and post-treatment plasma lactate (all patients).
| Lactate | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiamine alone | Thiamine and magnesium | Magnesium alone | ||||
| Pre treatment | Post treatment | Pre treatment | Post treatment | Pre treatment | Post treatment | |
| 13 | 19 | 10 | 26 | 13 | 22 | |
| > 2 mmol/L | 23 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 26 | 16 |
| % Normalisation | 20 | 46 | 25 | |||
| McNemar test | 0.070 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | |||
Figure 8Pre- and post-treatment plasma lactate in the context of low circulating serum magnesium.
Pre- and post-treatment plasma lactate in the context of low circulating serum magnesium.
| Lactate | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiamine alone | Thiamine and magnesium | Magnesium alone | ||||
| Pre treatment | Post treatment | Pre treatment | Post treatment | Pre treatment | Post treatment | |
| 6 | 9 | 5 | 15 | 6 | 11 | |
| > 2 mmol/L | 17 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| % Normalisation | 15 | 50 | 24 | |||
| McNemar test | 0.375 | 0.002 | 0.063 | |||
Figure 9Time (h) to GMAWS = 0 comparison between groups.
Comparison between groups of Time required to achieve first GMAWS = 0 score (one-way ANOVA Tukey test).
| (I) Randomisation | (J) Randomisation | Mean difference (I–J) | SE | Sig | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 6.4686 | 1.4477 | 0.000 | 3.022 | 9.916 |
| 3 | 6.2719 | 1.4381 | 0.000 | 2.848 | 9.696 | |
| 2 | 1 | − 6.4686 | 1.4477 | 0.000 | − 9.916 | − 3.022 |
| 3 | − 0.1966 | 1.3791 | 0.989 | − 3.480 | 3.087 | |
| 3 | 1 | − 6.2719 | 1.4381 | 0.000 | − 9.696 | − 2.848 |
| 2 | 0.1966 | 1.3791 | 0.989 | − 3.087 | 3.480 | |
Figure 10Benzodiazepine (Diazepam equivalent dose) to GMAWS = 0 comparison between groups.
Comparison between groups of benzodiazepine (Diazepam equivalent dose) required to achieve first GMAWS = 0 score (one-way ANOVA Tukey test).
| (I) Randomisation | (J) Randomisation | Mean difference (I–J) | SE | Sig | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 22.373 | 11.520 | 0.133 | − 5.05 | 49.80 |
| 3 | 21.524 | 11.442 | 0.150 | − 5.72 | 48.76 | |
| 2 | 1 | − 22.373 | 11.520 | 0.133 | − 49.80 | 5.05 |
| 3 | − 0.849 | 11.074 | 0.997 | − 27.21 | 25.51 | |
| 3 | 1 | − 21.524 | 11.442 | 0.150 | − 48.76 | 5.72 |
| 2 | 0.849 | 11.074 | 0.997 | − 25.51 | 27.21 | |