Jonathan Hindmarsh1, Keith Holden2. 1. Specialist Centre for Palliative Care, St. Benedict's Hospice, Sunderland, United Kingdom; Department of Pharmacy, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Jonathan.hindmarsh@nhs.net. 2. School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland SR1 3SD, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of electronically prescribed mixed-drug infusions on the prevalence and types of prescription errors and staff time. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Before-and-after study on acute medical wards of a large UK teaching hospital, utilising patient and staff data from the assessed wards. INTERVENTION: Electronically-generated mixed-drug infusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Rate of prescription errors (divided into errors of commission and omission); (2) time taken to process patient discharge prescriptions containing a mixed-drug infusion; and (3) time between prescription and administration of mixed-drug infusions. RESULTS: 100 errors of omission were detected pre-intervention, whilst none were detected post intervention. 6 errors of commission were identified at baseline, whilst 2 were highlighted post intervention (p = 0.149). 14 physicochemically incompatible infusions were prescribed at baseline, post-intervention all infusions were compatible (p < 0.01). Time spent processing discharge prescriptions fell from 60 min (SME±1.7) to 26 min (SME± 2.7; p < 0.01). The median time from prescription to administration reduced from 120 min (95 % CI 106-150) to 65 min (95 % CI 43-85; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention eliminated errors of omission and facilitated the prescribing of compatible multicomponent infusions. Electronically prescribed mixed-drug infusions also reduced both the time taken to complete discharge prescriptions and the time taken to commence such infusions.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of electronically prescribed mixed-drug infusions on the prevalence and types of prescription errors and staff time. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Before-and-after study on acute medical wards of a large UK teaching hospital, utilising patient and staff data from the assessed wards. INTERVENTION: Electronically-generated mixed-drug infusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Rate of prescription errors (divided into errors of commission and omission); (2) time taken to process patient discharge prescriptions containing a mixed-drug infusion; and (3) time between prescription and administration of mixed-drug infusions. RESULTS: 100 errors of omission were detected pre-intervention, whilst none were detected post intervention. 6 errors of commission were identified at baseline, whilst 2 were highlighted post intervention (p = 0.149). 14 physicochemically incompatible infusions were prescribed at baseline, post-intervention all infusions were compatible (p < 0.01). Time spent processing discharge prescriptions fell from 60 min (SME±1.7) to 26 min (SME± 2.7; p < 0.01). The median time from prescription to administration reduced from 120 min (95 % CI 106-150) to 65 min (95 % CI 43-85; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention eliminated errors of omission and facilitated the prescribing of compatible multicomponent infusions. Electronically prescribed mixed-drug infusions also reduced both the time taken to complete discharge prescriptions and the time taken to commence such infusions.