| Literature DB >> 35483018 |
Ying Chen1,2,3, Yu Wang4, Athanasios Nenes5,6, Oliver Wild1, Shaojie Song7,8, Dawei Hu9, Dantong Liu10, Jianjun He11, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz12, Joshua S Apte13, Sachin S Gunthe14,15, Pengfei Liu16.
Abstract
The interaction between water vapor and atmospheric aerosol leads to enhancement in aerosol water content, which facilitates haze development, but its concentrations, sources, and impacts remain largely unknown in polluted urban environments. Here, we show that the Indian capital, Delhi, which tops the list of polluted capital cities, also experiences the highest aerosol water yet reported worldwide. This high aerosol water promotes secondary formation of aerosols and worsens air pollution. We report that severe pollution events are commonly associated with high aerosol water which enhances light scattering and reduces visibility by 70%. Strong light scattering also suppresses the boundary layer height on winter mornings in Delhi, inhibiting dispersal of pollutants and further exacerbating morning pollution peaks. We provide evidence that ammonium chloride is the largest contributor to aerosol water in Delhi, making up 40% on average, and we highlight that regulation of chlorine-containing precursors should be considered in mitigation strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Heterogeneous formation; Hygroscopicity; Particulate matter; Secondary inorganic aerosol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35483018 PMCID: PMC9178790 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 11.357
Figure 1Chemical composition of PM1 in Delhi by season. The average PM1 mass concentration (size of dot), RH, wind speed, and dominant wind direction are given in the top panel. The relative contributions of each chemical component and the aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) associated with it are given in the pie charts. The large pie charts at the top show the average over the whole period. The pale blue color indicates total ALWC mass concentration.
Figure 2Diurnal patterns of ALWC (a), RH (b), and PBL height (c) in four seasons in Delhi. The shaded areas indicate one standard deviation.
Figure 3Relationships between ALWC, PM1, chloride fraction, and RH. (a) Mass-based hygroscopic growth factor of dry PM1 (y-axis) as a function of RH for different chloride fractions (indicated by color). The pie charts show the chemical composition of dry PM1 (top), the relative contribution of each component to ALWC (middle), and the relative contributions of dry PM1 (gray) and aerosol water (pale blue) to visibility impairment (bottom). The pie slices for chloride in PM1 and the contribution of ammonium chloride to ALWC are detached. The colors on the pie charts are the same as in Figure . The frequency of occurrence of each RH regime is marked in black for the whole period and in red for the winter season. (b) Chloride mass fraction in dry PM1 as a function of RH. ALWC is indicated by color, and PM1 dry mass concentration is indicated by the size of the circle. The error bars show one standard deviation.
Figure 4The rate constants (k) for heterogeneous loss of N2O5 and SO2. The k values for wet and dry particles are indicated by the black lines, with filled colors in between showing the contributions of enhancements from aerosol water associated with different species. Note that the y-axis for k values is on a logarithmic scale. RH is given by gray lines in panels (a) and (c), with a dashed gray line showing the 60% RH level. Sulfur and nitrogen oxidation ratios are given by red and blue lines, respectively. Two four-day periods are analyzed, with the polluted period shown in the top panels (a, b) and the relatively clean period shown in the bottom panels (c, d).