| Literature DB >> 35482823 |
Fazle Mabood1, Maria Imtiaz2, Maimona Rafiq3, Essam Roshdy El-Zahar4,5, Maawiya Ould Sidi6, Muhammad Ijaz Khan7.
Abstract
The flow of nanofluid over a variable thickened stretching sheet is studied in this article. Non-Fourier's heat flux and non-Fick's mass flux are incorporated for heat and mass flow analysis. Silver (Ag) and Copper (Cu) are considered nanoparticles with water as base fluid. The resulting equations are transformed into the dimensionless form using similarity transformation and solved by RK-4 with the shooting method. The impact of the governing parameters on the dimensionless velocity, temperature, concentration, skin friction coefficient, streamlines, and finally isotherms are incorporated. It is observed that increment in power-law index parameter uplifts the fluid flow, heat, and mass transfer. The increase in the magnitude of skin friction coefficient in (x-direction) with wall thickness parameter is high for nanofluid containing silver nanoparticles as compared to copper nanoparticles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35482823 PMCID: PMC9049573 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Geometry of the problem.
Thermophysical properties of the nanoparticles and base fluid (water).
| Properties | Sliver (Ag) |
| Water (Pr = 6.2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10,500 | 8933 | 997.1 | |
| 235 | 385 | 4179 | |
| 429 | 401 | 0.613 |
Variation of skin friction coefficient () with different values of ϕ, λ, n and β.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| 0.05 | -1.78589 | -3.10892 | - 1.47080 | - 2.76750 | - 1.62147 | - 1.62146 | - 1.38789 | - 1.38789 | |
| 0.1 | -2.31237 | -4.08215 | -1.91915 | -3.66412 | -1.99524 | -1.99524 | -1.70783 | -1.70783 | |
| 0.2 | -3.39246 | -6.04604 | -2.83129 | -5.45873 | -2.81992 | -2.81991 | -2.41371 | -2.41371 | |
|
| 0.05 | -1.70536 | -2.95248 | -1.40042 | -2.61996 | -1.57773 | -1.57773 | -1.35046 | -1.35046 |
| 0.1 | -2.15235 | -3.76926 | -1.77833 | -3.36705 | -1.91329 | -1.91329 | -1.63768 | -1.63768 | |
| 0.2 | -3.07363 | -5.42017 | -2.54938 | -4.86193 | -3.07364 | -5.42018 | -2.54939 | -4.86193 | |
Fig 2Effect of n, ϕ on f′(ξ).
Fig 20Isotherms for different values of nanoparticles volume fraction ϕ at λ = n = β = 3, δ = γ = 2.
Fig 3Effect of n, ϕ on g′(ξ).
Fig 4Effect of λ, ϕ on f′(ξ).
Fig 5Effect of λ, ϕ on g′(ξ).
Fig 6Effect of β, ϕ on f′(ξ).
Fig 7Effect of β, ϕ on g′(ξ).
Fig 8Effect of n, ϕ on θ(ξ).
Fig 9Effect of λ, ϕ on θ(ξ).
Fig 10Effect of β, ϕ on θ(ξ).
Fig 11Effect of δ, ϕ on θ(ξ).
Fig 12Effect of n, ϕ on Φ(ξ).
Fig 13Effect of λ, ϕ on Φ(ξ).
Fig 14Effect of β, ϕ on Φ(ξ).
Fig 15Effect of γ, ϕ on Φ(ξ).
Fig 16Effect of Sc, φ on Φ(ξ).
Fig 17Effect of λ, β, ϕ on (Rex)1/2Cfx.
Fig 18Effect of λ, β, ϕ on (Rey)1/2Cfy.
Variation of skin friction coefficient () with different values of ϕ, λ, n and β.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| 0.05 | -7.62249 | -3.79191 | - 9.78189 | - 4.37888 | - 5.87440 | - 2.07691 | - 6.94077 | - 2.4539 | |
| 0.1 | -9.63955 | -4.88781 | -12.2536 | -5.57904 | -7.22856 | -2.55568 | -8.54075 | -3.01961 | |
| 0.2 | -13.9066 | -7.14930 | -17.5537 | -8.09412 | -10.2162 | -3.61199 | -12.0708 | -4.26767 | |
|
| 0.05 | -7.34383 | -3.62733 | -9.45701 | -4.20753 | 5.71596 | -2.02089 | -6.75357 | -2.38775 |
| 0.1 | -9.09617 | -4.56124 | -11.6274 | -5.24149 | -6.93163 | -2.45070 | -8.18992 | -2.89557 | |
| 0.2 | -12.8371 | -6.49921 | -16.3309 | -7.42514 | -12.8371 | -6.49921 | -16.3309 | -7.42514 | |
Fig 19Streamlines for different values of nanoparticles volume fraction ϕ at λ = n = β = 3.
Fig 21Effect of ϕ, β, λ on −θ′(0).
Fig 22Effect of ϕ, γ, Sc on −Φ′(0).
Comparison of f″(0) and g″(0) for value of n when other parameters are zero.
| Khan et al. [ | Present result | |||
| -1.414214 | -1.414214 | -1.414214 | -1.414214 | |