| Literature DB >> 35482737 |
Yonglian Chang1, Yingjun Huang1, Manman Li2, Zhengmin Duan2.
Abstract
The relationship between haze pollution and insurance development is investigated based on the concentration of PM2.5 of 268 Chinese cities during 2009~2018. Subsequently, the effect of haze pollution on the development of insurance and the underlying mechanisms are also explored. The regional governance of haze pollution and its impact on insurance development is estimated by using a unified framework of two-stage least squares. The machine learning method-elastic network is adopted to filter the control variables and avoid multi-collinearity. The results show that haze pollution has an adverse effect on the insurance development through two important underlying mechanisms, residents' emotions and economic development. Haze pollution affects residents' emotions, and the impact coefficient is approximately equal to -0.18, which further inhibits residents' participation in insurance. Moreover, pollution restricts residents' budgets by hindering economic development, the impact coefficient is about -0.07, thus, the development of insurance is suppressed. These two negative effects exhibit regional variations, which gradually attenuate from eastern, western to the Chinese central region. The regional governance has a positive effect on haze pollution with the coefficient of -0.07, while impact coefficient of haze pollution on insurance development decreases to -0.02. The policy implication is that government supervision can formulate reasonable environmental and insurance policies based on the heterogeneity of regional development to alleviate haze pollution and promote insurance development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35482737 PMCID: PMC9049571 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1PM2.5 concentration of China.
Fig 2The transmission mechanisms of the effect of haze pollution on insurance development.
Fig 3Insurance density of China.
Fig 4The comparison of ridge, lasso and elastic net.
Fig 5Coefficient solution path.
Fig 6The corresponding trend of λ and the number of variables.
Descriptive statistics of main variables.
| Variable | Full name | samples | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preincome | Premium income | 2680 | 7359.83 | 13094.62 | 23.94 | 197315.3 |
| PM2.5 | The concentration of PM2.5 | 2680 | 37.42422 | 15.95459 | 4.6764 | 86.47989 |
| Population | Population | 2680 | 148.9809 | 185.7041 | 15.1 | 2465 |
| Podensity | Population density | 2680 | 916.1335 | 876.6028 | 12.4602 | 11449.3 |
| Terproperty | The proportion of the added value of the tertiary industry in regional GDP | 2680 | 44.60842 | 11.18169 | 9.76 | 85.95 |
| Industry | Number of industrial enterprises | 2680 | 596.3416 | 1078.555 | 6 | 8413 |
| Sturatio | The proportion of college students in the population | 2680 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 0.00000025 | 0.242 |
| Sewage | Urban domestic sewage treatment rate | 2680 | 81.87723 | 16.69396 | 0.16 | 100 |
Fig 7Scatter diagram and regression line of the correlation between PM2.5 and air flow coefficient (KQ).
Fig 8The proportion of environment-related words in the government work report.
Statistics on the frequency of environmental policy vocabulary of government work reports in 2018.
| PM2.5/ PM10 | SO2 | Atmosphere/air | low carbon/CO2 | ecology | environmental protection/ environmental improvement | pollution | energy consumption | emission reduction | green | COD/sewage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 29 | 6 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 5 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 32 | 15 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 44 | 8 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 3 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 52 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 7 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 59 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 23 | 11 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 6 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
|
| 6 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 23 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 |
|
| 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 52 | 7 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 49 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 23 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 3 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 5 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 4 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 51 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 8 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
|
| 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 26 | 9 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
|
| 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 29 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 |
|
| 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 9 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 3 |
|
| 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 7 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 50 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 33 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 2 |
|
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 6 |
Notes: the definition of the COD is same as the study [3]. COD represents the amount of oxygen required to oxidize the organic matter in water.
Haze pollution and insurance development: Benchmark regression results.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current PM2.5 | The lag of PM2.5 | current PM2.5 | |||||||
| Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | Preincome | |
|
| -0.078 | -0.077 | -0.071 | -0.094 | -0.100 | -0.099 | |||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | ||||
|
| 0.030 | 0.029 | 0.028 | ||||||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |||||||
|
| -0.049 | -0.048 | -0.050 | ||||||
| (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||||
|
| -0.310 | -0.185 | -0.312 | ||||||
| (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.03) | |||||||
|
| -0.010 | -0.019 | -0.014 | -0.017 | -0.018 | -0.009 | |||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | ||||
|
| 1.117 | 1.114 | 1.224 | 1.088 | 1.084 | 1.164 | 1.218 | 1.111 | 1.109 |
| (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.05) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.04) | |
|
| 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.016 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
|
| 0.076 | 0.077 | 0.070 | 0.072 | 0.073 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 0.079 | 0.080 |
| (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
|
| -0.055 | -0.055 | -0.049 | -0.054 | -0.054 | -0.053 | -0.049 | -0.054 | -0.054 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 0.887 | 0.887 | 0.892 | 0.898 | 0.898 | 0.899 | 0.892 | 0.887 | 0.887 |
|
| 0.873 | 0.873 | 0.879 | 0.884 | 0.884 | 0.886 | 0.880 | 0.874 | 0.874 |
|
| 2680 | 2680 | 2680 | 2412 | 2412 | 2412 | 2680 | 2680 | 2680 |
Notes: Standard errors in parentheses.
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01; The number in brackets is the standard deviation, L. is a one-period lag operator. Same below.
Haze pollution and insurance development: Analysis of residents’ participation in the insurance.
| Insurance density and premium income | The impact of PM2.5 on insurance density | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All samples | East | West | Central | East | West | Central | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Preincome | Preincome | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | Insdensity | |
|
| 0.171 | |||||||||
| (0.02) | ||||||||||
|
| 0.161 | |||||||||
| (0.02) | ||||||||||
|
| -0.180 | -0.642 | -0.307 | -0.161 | ||||||
| (0.05) | (0.09) | (0.10) | (0.02) | |||||||
|
| -0.192 | -0.410 | -0.406 | -0.144 | ||||||
| (0.02) | (0.10) | (0.08) | (0.03) | |||||||
|
| 0.897 | 0.897 | 0.633 | 0.080 | 1.717 | -0.047 | 0.208 | 1.820 | -0.017 | 0.222 |
| (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.11) | (0.05) | (0.21) | (0.06) | (0.08) | (0.23) | (0.06) | (0.08) | |
|
| 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.054 | 0.050 | 0.032 | 0.100 | 0.070 | 0.025 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.02) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.02) | |
|
| -0.022 | -0.014 | -0.035 | 0.149 | 0.021 | 0.085** | 0.127 | 0.014 | 0.076 | 0.126 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.06) | (0.04) | (0.02) | (0.07) | (0.04) | (0.02) | |
|
| -0.187 | -0.126 | -0.215 | 0.311 | -0.275 | 0.213 | 0.606 | -0.216 | 0.171 | 0.620 |
| (0.02) | (0.03) | (0.07) | (0.04) | (0.10) | (0.14) | (0.18) | (0.13) | (0.14) | (0.19) | |
|
| 0.061 | 0.035 | -0.021 | 0.013 | 0.137 | 0.060 | -0.051 | 0.166 | 0.065 | -0.046 |
| (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.04) | (0.02) | (0.07) | (0.04) | (0.02) | (0.08) | (0.04) | (0.02) | |
|
| -0.001 | -0.014 | -0.111 | 0.113 | -0.161 | 0.125 | 0.124 | -0.188 | 0.122 | 0.109 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.04) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.06) | (0.04) | (0.04) | |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 0.905 | 0.910 | 0.536 | 0.547 | 0.561 | 0.475 | 0.477 | 0.552 | 0.488 | 0.502 |
|
| 0.894 | 0.898 | 0.481 | 0.487 | 0.504 | 0.402 | 0.409 | 0.486 | 0.410 | 0.430 |
|
| 2680 | 2412 | 2680 | 2412 | 950 | 720 | 1010 | 855 | 648 | 909 |
Notes: Standard errors in parentheses.
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01; the number in brackets is the standard deviation, L. is a one-period lag operator. Same below.
The eastern region includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan. The central region includes Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei and Hunan. The western regions include Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia, Qinghai, Xinjiang, and Guangxi. This article divides the 268 prefecture-level cities into the corresponding regions.
Haze pollution and insurance development: The level of economic development.
| GDP and premium income | The impact of PM2.5 on GDP | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All samples | East | West | Central | East | West | Central | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Preincome | Preincome | GDP | GDP | GDP | GDP | GDP | GDP | GDP | GDP | |
|
| 1.229 | |||||||||
| (0.06) | ||||||||||
|
| 1.283 | |||||||||
| (0.07) | ||||||||||
|
| -0.065 | -0.117 | -0.052 | -0.037 | ||||||
| (0.01) | (0.04) | (0.02) | (0.01) | |||||||
|
| -0.064 | -0.118 | -0.042 | -0.032 | ||||||
| (0.02) | (0.05) | (0.02) | (0.02) | |||||||
|
| -0.321 | -0.233 | 1.255 | 1.161 | 1.885 | 0.982 | 0.728 | 1.765 | 0.943 | 0.508 |
| (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.09) | (0.17) | (0.07) | (0.24) | (0.18) | (0.08) | (0.26) | |
|
| -0.032 | -0.038 | 0.032 | 0.035 | 0.118 | 0.014 | -0.050 | 0.131 | 0.013 | -0.064 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.03) | |
|
| -0.009 | -0.009 | -0.008 | -0.009 | 0.010 | -0.008 | -0.022 | 0.010 | -0.005 | -0.019 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
|
| 0.025 | 0.031 | -0.272 | -0.137 | -0.335 | -0.049 | 0.079 | -0.189 | -0.029 | 0.415 |
| (0.04) | (0.05) | (0.07) | (0.08) | (0.07) | (0.05) | (0.30) | (0.10) | (0.06) | (0.40) | |
|
| -0.021 | -0.027 | 0.074 | 0.069 | 0.172 | 0.050 | 0.014 | 0.164 | 0.037 | 0.007 |
| (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.03) | (0.03) | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
|
| -0.011 | -0.012 | -0.031 | -0.031 | -0.020 | -0.021 | -0.027 | -0.012 | -0.025 | -0.026 |
| (0.00) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 0.962 | 0.964 | 0.954 | 0.961 | 0.960 | 0.975 | 0.919 | 0.966 | 0.980 | 0.935 |
|
| 0.958 | 0.959 | 0.948 | 0.956 | 0.955 | 0.971 | 0.908 | 0.961 | 0.976 | 0.926 |
|
| 2680 | 2412 | 2680 | 2412 | 950 | 720 | 1010 | 855 | 648 | 909 |
Notes: Standard errors in parentheses,
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01; The number in brackets is the standard deviation, L. It is a one-period lag operator. Same below.
Regional governance and insurance development: Instrumental variables regression.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| -0.074 | |||
| (0.010) | ||||
|
| -0.061 | |||
| (0.010) | ||||
|
| -0.090 | |||
| (0.024) | ||||
|
| -0.054 | |||
| (0.016) | ||||
|
| -0.083 | -0.080 | -0.078 | -0.079 |
| (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.012) | (0.012) | |
|
| 111.26 | 107.19 | 108.72 | 108.07 |
|
| Preincome | |||
|
| -0.216 | -0.190 | -0.264 | -0.180 |
| (0.061) | (0.061) | (0.069) | (0.067) | |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 0.8333 | 0.8323 | 0.8304 | 0.8302 |
|
| 0.8135 | 0.8124 | 0.8102 | 0.8100 |
|
| 2680 | 2680 | 2680 | 2680 |
Notes: Standard errors in parentheses.
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01; The number in brackets is the standard deviation, L. is a one-period lag operator. Same below.
Regional governance and insurance development: Robustness analysis.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
| -0.074 | -0.036 | -0.035 | -0.043 | -0.075 | -0.070 |
| (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.009) | (0.009) | (0.010) | (0.011) | |
|
| -0.082 | -0.036 | -0.030 | -0.085 | -0.083 | -0.095 |
| (0.011) | (0.012) | (0.013) | (0.009) | (0.011) | (0.010) | |
|
| 0.031 | |||||
| (0.013) | ||||||
|
| -0.074 | |||||
| (0.021) | ||||||
|
| 0.008 | |||||
| (0.009) | ||||||
|
| 111.72 | 898.39 | 864.64 | 828.69 | 111.82 | 94.08 |
|
|
| |||||
|
| -0.206 | -0.564 | -0.544 | -0.235 | -0.163 | -0.090 |
| (0.058) | (0.020) | (0.231) | (0.076) | (0.064) | (0.060) | |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 0.8325 | 0.8177 | 0.8132 | 0.8309 | 0.8337 | 0.8274 |
|
| 0.8126 | 0.7901 | 0.7844 | 0.8082 | 0.8139 | 0.8044 |
|
| 2650 | 2128 | 2086 | 2412 | 2680 | 2412 |
Notes: Standard errors in parentheses.
* p < 0.10,
** p < 0.05,
*** p < 0.01; The number in brackets is the standard deviation, L. is a one-period lag operator. Same below.