| Literature DB >> 35482664 |
Ann W N Auma1, Corinne Kowal2, Carey L Shive1,2, Alyssa Lange1,2, Sofi Damjanovska2, Elizabeth Zebrowski2, Elane Reyes2, Leonard Calabrese3, Lenche Kostadinova2, Yngve Falck-Ytter2, Maya Mattar2, Donald D Anthony1,2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated rheumatoid factor (RF) levels and systemic immune activation are highly prevalent during chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has been associated with normalization of various soluble immune activation parameters. Whether the RF levels relate to soluble immune activation markers during chronic HCV infection, and over what time frame RF levels normalize during and after DAA treatment is unknown and was investigated here.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35482664 PMCID: PMC9049346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Clinical characteristics of HCV infected RF+ and RF- participants at baseline (before the initiation of DAA therapy).
| RF+ | RF- | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 44 | n = 10 | RF+ vs RF- | |
|
| 60 (56; 64) | 58 (56;62) | 0.46 |
|
| |||
|
| 43 (98%) | 10 (100%) | |
|
| 1 (2%) | 0 | |
|
| |||
|
| 27 (61%) | 6 (60%) | |
|
| 15 (34%) | 4 (40%) | |
|
| 2 (5%) | -- | |
|
| 3.7 (3.5; 3.8) | 3.6 (3.5; 3.9) | 0.71 |
|
| 58 (36; 90) | 46 (31; 84) | 0.35 |
|
| 50 (31; 86) | 37 (28; 66) | 0.29 |
|
| 184 (149; 243) | 221 (183; 276) | 0.14 |
|
| 2.1 (1.8; 2.6) | 2.2 (2.0; 2.4) | 0.62 |
|
| 51 (36; 235) | 4 (2; 7) | <.0001 |
|
| n = 42 | n = 10 | |
|
| 11 (26%) | 4 (40%) | |
|
| 20 (48%) | 5 (50%) | |
|
| 11 (26%) | 1 (10%) | |
|
| 2.0 (1.3; 3.6) | 1.2 (1.0; 2.6) | 0.15 |
|
| |||
|
| 27 (62%) | 7 (70%) | |
|
| 13 (30%) | 3 (30%) | |
|
| 1 (2%) | -- | |
|
| 1 (2%) | -- | |
|
| 1 (2%) | -- | |
|
| 1 (2%) | -- | |
|
| 8.7 (6.1; 11.5) | 5.75 (5.0; 7.2) | 0.04 |
|
| 33 (75%) | 6 (60%) | |
|
| 25 (57%) | 3 (30%) | |
|
| 18 (40%) | 2 (20%) | |
|
| 5 (11%) | -- | |
|
| 29.3 (26.5; 31.4) | 33.65 (28.8; 34.8) | 0.07 |
|
| 7 (16%) | -- |
Median (25th, 75th percentiles) shown unless otherwise indicated
[No. (%)]
*Statistically significant (P value <0.05) using Mann Whitney test for unpaired comparison
Abbreviations:
ALT, alanine aminotransferase;
APRI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index;
AST, aspartate aminotransferase;
ALC, Absolute lymphocyte count
BMI, Body Mass Index
HCV, hepatitis C virus.
Fibrosis 4 index calculated as [age × AST level] / [platelet count ×√ALT level].
Fig 1Rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity commonly persists in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected persons during and after the course of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy.
HCV infected (HCV+) RF positive (RF+) persons were followed longitudinally over the course of HCV DAA therapy; before (week = 0: n = 44), during (week 4: RF+ n = 27/36, 75%; HCV+ n = 11/39, 28%), (week 8: RF+ n = 24/30, 80%; HCV+ n = 1/39, 3%) and after (week 24: RF+ n = 18/26, 69%; HCV+ n = 4/39, 10%) treatment, where the proportion of the persons that were RF+ (>24 IU/mL) and had detectable serum HCV levels was determined (A). A subset of this group (week 0, n = 15) was followed over an additional extended time frame after HCV DAA therapy initiation at week 4: RF+ n = 11/13, 85%; week 8: RF+ n = 10/11, 91%; week 12: RF+ n = 1/1, 100%; week 24: RF+ n = 11/13 85%; and at least 70 weeks out (week 74–158): RF+ n = 7/15 47%; and the serum RF values determined at each timepoint (B). RF intermediate (n = 6, 17–24 IU/mL) (C) persons that were HCV+ was followed up and the serum RF values determined at each timepoint along the course of HCV DAA therapy. Differences between timepoints were determined by the paired Wilcoxon test.
Fig 2TE score is elevated in rheumatoid factor (RF) positive persons and the baseline TE score correlates with RF values over the course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy.
Panel A: TE scores prior to DAA therapy are shown for RF+ (n = 44) and RF- (n = 8) HCV infected persons. Correlations between baseline TE score and RF level at weeks 0 (panel B) and week 24 (panel C) are shown. Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison between two groups. Spearman’s Rho correlation was used to determine correlations between two values.