OBJECTIVE: Effective treatments exist for binge-eating disorder (BED), although roughly 50% of patients fail to attain binge-eating abstinence. Evidence on how to refine treatments is lacking. Conceptualizing BED as arising from a network of symptom-to-symptom interactions allows for the identification of the most strongly connected symptoms, which could inform intervention targets. This study assessed how BED symptom centrality changed with behaviorally based weight-loss treatments (BBWLTs). METHODS: Participants were 191 adult patients (71% female, 79% White) with BED with comorbid obesity participating in a randomized controlled trial testing 6-month BBWLTs for BED. Independent assessments of BED symptoms were performed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 12 months after treatment. Strength centrality indicated how strongly and frequently symptoms were associated with each other in the network. Significant changes in centrality between timepoints were determined using permutation tests. RESULTS: At pretreatment, overvaluation of shape/weight and preoccupation with shape/weight and food/eating had the highest strength centrality. At posttreatment and 12-month follow-up, dissatisfaction with shape/weight had the highest centrality, which significantly increased from pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The relations among symptoms of BED are not static and change over time with treatment. BBWLTs do not appear to reduce connectivity of overvaluation of shape/weight (the most central BED symptom prior to treatment), but instead increase connectivity of dissatisfaction with shape/weight with other symptoms following treatment. The observed network structure of symptoms following BBWLTs resembles network analyses of people without eating disorders. Findings highlight the importance of understanding how treatments impact symptom relationships, not just symptom intensities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Effective treatments exist for binge-eating disorder (BED), although roughly 50% of patients fail to attain binge-eating abstinence. Evidence on how to refine treatments is lacking. Conceptualizing BED as arising from a network of symptom-to-symptom interactions allows for the identification of the most strongly connected symptoms, which could inform intervention targets. This study assessed how BED symptom centrality changed with behaviorally based weight-loss treatments (BBWLTs). METHODS: Participants were 191 adult patients (71% female, 79% White) with BED with comorbid obesity participating in a randomized controlled trial testing 6-month BBWLTs for BED. Independent assessments of BED symptoms were performed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 12 months after treatment. Strength centrality indicated how strongly and frequently symptoms were associated with each other in the network. Significant changes in centrality between timepoints were determined using permutation tests. RESULTS: At pretreatment, overvaluation of shape/weight and preoccupation with shape/weight and food/eating had the highest strength centrality. At posttreatment and 12-month follow-up, dissatisfaction with shape/weight had the highest centrality, which significantly increased from pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The relations among symptoms of BED are not static and change over time with treatment. BBWLTs do not appear to reduce connectivity of overvaluation of shape/weight (the most central BED symptom prior to treatment), but instead increase connectivity of dissatisfaction with shape/weight with other symptoms following treatment. The observed network structure of symptoms following BBWLTs resembles network analyses of people without eating disorders. Findings highlight the importance of understanding how treatments impact symptom relationships, not just symptom intensities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James I Hudson; James E Mitchell; Denise Wilfley; M Celeste Ferreira-Cornwell; Joseph Gao; Jiannong Wang; Timothy Whitaker; Jeffrey Jonas; Maria Gasior Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: C Beard; A J Millner; M J C Forgeard; E I Fried; K J Hsu; M T Treadway; C V Leonard; S J Kertz; T Björgvinsson Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Margarita C T Slof-Op 't Landt; Alexandra E Dingemans; Jésus de la Torre Y Rivas; Eric F van Furth Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Lisa M Anderson; Kathryn M Smith; Lauren M Schaefer; Ross D Crosby; Li Cao; Scott G Engel; Scott J Crow; Stephen A Wonderlich; Carol B Peterson Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2020-04-27