Literature DB >> 35482216

Feature Generalization for Breast Cancer Detection in Histopathological Images.

Rik Das1, Kanwalpreet Kaur2, Ekta Walia3.   

Abstract

Recent period has witnessed benchmarked performance of transfer learning using deep architectures in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of breast cancer. In this perspective, the pre-trained neural network needs to be fine-tuned with relevant data to extract useful features from the dataset. However, in addition to the computational overhead, it suffers the curse of overfitting in case of feature extraction from smaller datasets. Handcrafted feature extraction techniques as well as feature extraction using pre-trained deep networks come into rescue in aforementioned situation and have proved to be much more efficient and lightweight compared to deep architecture-based transfer learning techniques. This research has identified the competence of classifying breast cancer images using feature engineering and representation learning over the established and contemporary notion of using transfer learning techniques. Moreover, it has revealed superior feature learning capacity with feature fusion in contrast to the conventional belief of understanding unknown feature patterns better with representation learning alone. Experiments have been conducted on two different and popular breast cancer image datasets, namely, KIMIA Path960 and BreakHis datasets. A comparison of image-level accuracy is performed on these datasets using the above-mentioned feature extraction techniques. Image level accuracy of 97.81% is achieved for KIMIA Path960 dataset using individual features extracted with handcrafted (color histogram) technique. Fusion of uniform Local Binary Pattern (uLBP) and color histogram features has resulted in 99.17% of highest accuracy for the same dataset. Experimentation with BreakHis dataset has resulted in highest classification accuracy of 88.41% with color histogram features for images with 200X magnification factor. Finally, the results are contrasted to that of state-of-the-art and superior performances are observed on many occasions with the proposed fusion-based techniques. In case of BreakHis dataset, the highest accuracies 87.60% (with least standard deviation) and 85.77% are recorded for 200X and 400X magnification factors, respectively, and the results for the aforesaid magnification factors of images have exceeded the state-of-the-art.
© 2022. International Association of Scientists in the Interdisciplinary Areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Computer-aided diagnosis; Feature engineering; Histopathological images; Representation learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35482216     DOI: 10.1007/s12539-022-00515-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interdiscip Sci        ISSN: 1867-1462            Impact factor:   2.233


  15 in total

1.  Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  John Arevalo; Fabio A González; Raúl Ramos-Pollán; Jose L Oliveira; Miguel Angel Guevara Lopez
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 2.  Representation learning: a review and new perspectives.

Authors:  Yoshua Bengio; Aaron Courville; Pascal Vincent
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer based on fine needle biopsy microscopic images.

Authors:  Marek Kowal; Paweł Filipczuk; Andrzej Obuchowicz; Józef Korbicz; Roman Monczak
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 4.  Health-Related Quality of Life: The Impact on Morbidity and Mortality.

Authors:  Andrea Sitlinger; Syed Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 5.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  A Brief Overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors, 4th Edition, Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Sinn; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The molecular basis of breast cancer pathological phenotypes.

Authors:  Yujing J Heng; Susan C Lester; Gary Mk Tse; Rachel E Factor; Kimberly H Allison; Laura C Collins; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kristin C Jensen; Nicole B Johnson; Jong Cheol Jeong; Rahi Punjabi; Sandra J Shin; Kamaljeet Singh; Gregor Krings; David A Eberhard; Puay Hoon Tan; Konstanty Korski; Frederic M Waldman; David A Gutman; Melinda Sanders; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Sydney R Flanagan; Deena Ma Gendoo; Gregory M Chen; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Giovanni Ciriello; Katherine A Hoadley; Charles M Perou; Andrew H Beck
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 8.  MicroRNAs as biomarkers for early breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis and therapy prediction.

Authors:  Farah J Nassar; Rihab Nasr; Rabih Talhouk
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on the Analysis of Cytological Images of Fine Needle Biopsies.

Authors:  Pawel Filipczuk; Thomas Fevens; Adam Krzyzak; Roman Monczak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  A Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification.

Authors:  Fabio A Spanhol; Luiz S Oliveira; Caroline Petitjean; Laurent Heutte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.