Literature DB >> 35482128

Hypoxia and anaerobic metabolism relate with immunologically cold breast cancer and poor prognosis.

Alexandra Giatromanolaki1, Anastasia G Gkegka1, Stamatia Pouliliou2, Eirini Biziota3, Stylianos Kakolyris3, Michael Koukourakis4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor HIF1α and lactate dehydrogenase LDHA drive anaerobic tumor metabolism and define clinical aggressiveness. We investigated their expression in breast cancer and their role in immune response and prognosis of breast cancer.
METHODS: Tissue material from 175 breast cancer patients treated in a prospective study were analyzed with immunohistochemistry for HIF1α and LDH5 expression, in parallel with the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte TIL-density and tertiary lymphoid structure TLS-density.
RESULTS: High LDH5 expression was noted in 48/175 tumors, and this was related to HIF1α overexpression (p < 0.0001), triple-negative TNBC histology (p = 0.01), poor disease-specific survival (p < 0.007), metastasis (p < 0.01), and locoregional recurrence (p = 0.03). High HIF1α expression, noted in 39/175 cases, was linked with low steroid receptor expression (p < 0.05), her2 overexpression (p = 0.01), poor survival (p < 0.04), and high metastasis rates (p < 0.004). High TIL-density in the invading tumor front (TILinv) was linked with low LDH5 and HIF expression (p < 0.0001) and better prognosis (p < 0.02). High TIL-density in inner tumor areas (TILinn) was significantly linked with TNBC. Multivariate analysis showed that PgR-status (p = 0.003, HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.4-6.0), TILinv (p = 0.02, HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.1-4.8), LDH5 (p = 0.01, HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.2-5.0), N-stage (p = 0.04, HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.0-5.8), T-stage (p = 0.04, HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.0-5.1), and her2 status (p = 0.05, HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.0-4.2) were independent variables defining death events.
CONCLUSION: Overexpression of LDH5, an event directly related to HIF1α overexpression, characterizes a third of breast tumors, which is more frequent in TNBC. Both HIF1α and LDH5 define cold breast cancer microenvironment and poor prognosis. A rational is provided to study further whether metabolic manipulations targeting HIF and LDH5 may enhance the antitumor immune response in breast cancer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; HIF1α; Immune response; LDH; Lymphocytes; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35482128     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06609-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  36 in total

Review 1.  HIF-1 mediates metabolic responses to intratumoral hypoxia and oncogenic mutations.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  The Warburg effect: essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel; Heinz Schmidberger; Arnulf Mayer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 3.  Hypoxia and acidosis: immune suppressors and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Sultan Damgaci; Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Pedro M Enriquez-Navas; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Albert Guvenis; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Metabolic crosstalk in the breast cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Ana S Dias; Catarina R Almeida; Luisa A Helguero; Iola F Duarte
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  PD-L1 protein expression in breast cancer is rare, enriched in basal-like tumours and associated with infiltrating lymphocytes.

Authors:  H R Ali; S-E Glont; F M Blows; E Provenzano; S-J Dawson; B Liu; L Hiller; J Dunn; C J Poole; S Bowden; H M Earl; P D P Pharoah; C Caldas
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  MCT1 in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Monocarboxylate Metabolism and Aggressive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Johnson; Paolo Cotzia; Roberto Fratamico; Lekha Mikkilineni; Jason Chen; Daniele Colombo; Mehri Mollaee; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Marina Domingo-Vidal; Zhao Lin; Tingting Zhan; Madalina Tuluc; Juan Palazzo; Ruth C Birbe; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-04-03

8.  Lactate concentration in breast cancer using advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sai Man Cheung; Ehab Husain; Yazan Masannat; Iain D Miller; Klaus Wahle; Steven D Heys; Jiabao He
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Lactate Metabolism and Immune Modulation in Breast Cancer: A Focused Review on Triple Negative Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Adviti Naik; Julie Decock
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Squamous Cell Head-Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy/Chemo-Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ioannis M Koukourakis; Anastasia G Gkegka; Erasmia Xanthopoulou; Christos Nanos; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Michael I Koukourakis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.109

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.