Literature DB >> 35482069

Development of novel models for predicting mismatch repair protein deficiency and relevant disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Yixin Xu1,2,3, Yuzhe Li3, Ziyan Zhu3, Jing Yang4, Yulin Tan1,2, Yibo Wang5,6, Xuezhong Xu7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency has attached more attention for its potential to be a biomarker of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, clinical models involving the expression status of MMR protein are rare. Herein, we sought to develop two clinical models (a diagnostic model for the prediction of MMR status and a prognostic model for the prediction of disease-free survival) for CRC patients.
METHODS: A total of 582 CRC patients were finally included. There were 53 patients with deficient expression of MMR protein. The differences between the deficient MMR (dMMR) group and the proficient MMR (pMMR) group were analyzed.
RESULTS: Compared to pMMR patients, those with dMMR status were younger and had better pathological features (depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, pathological stage, perineuronal invasion, and PLT level) and disease-free survival (DFS). The tumor location of the left colon, adenocarcinoma, and abnormal PLT level were identified as the independent predictors for pMMR. Based on these data, we developed the diagnostic model using Logistic regression analysis. It showed a satisfactory accuracy (AUC = 82.3% in the derivate set; AUC = 73.6% in the validation set). Furthermore, pMMR, poorer differentiation, perineuronal invasion, distant metastasis, lower hemoglobin level, and abnormal CEA level were established as the independent prognostic factors of poorer DFS. Based on them, a prognostic model with valuable performance (1-year AUC = 75.5%/3-year AUC = 76.9% in the derivate set; 1-year AUC = 72.3%/3-year AUC = 73.8% in the validation set) was developed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our diagnostic and prognostic models could identify CRC patients at risk for pMMR protein expression and disease recurrence. It may contribute to improving the diagnosis and treatment of CRC patients at an individual level.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; DNA mismatch repair protein; Development and validation; Diagnostic and prognostic models

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35482069     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04150-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  29 in total

Review 1.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Pembrolizumab in Microsatellite-Instability-High Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Thierry André; Kai-Keen Shiu; Tae Won Kim; Benny Vittrup Jensen; Lars Henrik Jensen; Cornelis Punt; Denis Smith; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Manuel Benavides; Peter Gibbs; Christelle de la Fouchardiere; Fernando Rivera; Elena Elez; Johanna Bendell; Dung T Le; Takayuki Yoshino; Eric Van Cutsem; Ping Yang; Mohammed Z H Farooqui; Patricia Marinello; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Mechanisms and functions of DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Guo-Min Li
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  Mismatch repair protein expression in patients with stage II and III sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lihua Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-the stable evidence.

Authors:  Eduardo Vilar; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Estimating cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in Vietnam.

Authors:  Binh Thang Tran; Kui Son Choi; Dae Kyung Sohn; Sun-Young Kim; Jae Kyung Suh; Thanh Huong Tran; Thi Thanh Binh Nguyen; Jin-Kyoung Oh
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Clinical characteristics, medical service utilization, and expenditure for colorectal cancer in China, 2005 to 2014: Overall design and results from a multicenter retrospective epidemiologic survey.

Authors:  Ju-Fang Shi; Le Wang; Jian-Chao Ran; Hong Wang; Cheng-Cheng Liu; Hai-Zeng Zhang; Lin Yang; Su-Sheng Shi; Li-Ming Jiang; Jin-Hu Fan; Yue-Ming Zhang; Wei-Hu Wang; Jian-Song Ren; Lin Zhu; Zhao-Xu Zheng; Yong-Kun Sun; Shuang-Mei Zou; Jun Jiang; Bo Chen; Hong-Da Chen; Guo-Xiang Liu; Li Yang; Yun-Chao Huang; Lan-Wei Guo; De-Bin Wang; Yong-Zhen Zhang; A-Yan Mao; Jia-Lin Wang; Ji-Yong Gong; Dong-Hua Wei; Wu-Qi Qiu; Bing-Bing Song; Kai Zhang; Ni Li; Eleonora Feletto; Jie-Bin Lew; You-Lin Qiao; Wan-Qing Chen; Min Dai; Jie He
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Erh Chen; Sung-Shuo Kao; Ren-Hua Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.