Ian Janssen1,2, Julie E Campbell1, Samah Zahran1, Travis J Saunders3, Jennifer R Tomasone1, Jean-Philippe Chaput4. 1. School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. 4. Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies report that the health benefits of physical activity differ depending on whether the activity is performed in the morning, afternoon or evening. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether the timing of physical activity within the 24-hour day is associated with health. METHODS: Five databases were searched for English or French language peer-reviewed studies that examined whether the timing of physical activity within the day is associated with health. No limits were placed on publication year, study population, study design or health outcomes. Studies that examined acute effects of physical activity or timing of physical activity around food intake were excluded. RESULTS: This systematic review examined 35 studies, with 17 259 participants, and the following health outcomes: measures of sleep health, adiposity, fat-free mass and muscle size, cardiometabolic biomarkers, physical function and mobility, mental health, and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality. Heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analyses, and we present our findings using narrative syntheses. Of the 35 studies, 11 reported that morning physical activity provides greater health benefits than afternoon/ evening physical activity, while 12 found that morning physical activity provides fewer health benefits than afternoon/evening physical. In the remaining 12 studies, there was no clear difference in health benefits based on the timing of physical activity. The quality of evidence for the different health outcomes across study designs was very low. CONCLUSION: There is no consistent evidence that physical activity at one time of day provides more favourable health benefits than physical activity at a different time of day. (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42021231088).
BACKGROUND: Recent studies report that the health benefits of physical activity differ depending on whether the activity is performed in the morning, afternoon or evening. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether the timing of physical activity within the 24-hour day is associated with health. METHODS: Five databases were searched for English or French language peer-reviewed studies that examined whether the timing of physical activity within the day is associated with health. No limits were placed on publication year, study population, study design or health outcomes. Studies that examined acute effects of physical activity or timing of physical activity around food intake were excluded. RESULTS: This systematic review examined 35 studies, with 17 259 participants, and the following health outcomes: measures of sleep health, adiposity, fat-free mass and muscle size, cardiometabolic biomarkers, physical function and mobility, mental health, and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality. Heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analyses, and we present our findings using narrative syntheses. Of the 35 studies, 11 reported that morning physical activity provides greater health benefits than afternoon/ evening physical activity, while 12 found that morning physical activity provides fewer health benefits than afternoon/evening physical. In the remaining 12 studies, there was no clear difference in health benefits based on the timing of physical activity. The quality of evidence for the different health outcomes across study designs was very low. CONCLUSION: There is no consistent evidence that physical activity at one time of day provides more favourable health benefits than physical activity at a different time of day. (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42021231088).
Authors: Eric Chen; Adam Viktorisson; Anna Danielsson; Annie Palstam; Katharina S Sunnerhagen Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Susan Benloucif; Larry Orbeta; Rosemary Ortiz; Imke Janssen; Sanford I Finkel; Joseph Bleiberg; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Sleep Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Ian Janssen; Donald H Paterson; Amy E Latimer; Ryan E Rhodes; Michelle E Kho; Audrey Hicks; Allana G Leblanc; Lori Zehr; Kelly Murumets; Mary Duggan Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Sally A M Fenton; Nikos Ntoumanis; Joan L Duda; George S Metsios; Peter C Rouse; Chen-An Yu; George D Kitas; Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van Zanten Journal: RMD Open Date: 2020-07
Authors: Jinfeng Zhao; Lisa Mackay; Kevin Chang; Suzanne Mavoa; Tom Stewart; Erika Ikeda; Niamh Donnellan; Melody Smith Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer R Tomasone; Ian Janssen; Travis J Saunders; Mary Duggan; Rebecca Jones; Melissa C Brouwers; Guy Faulkner; Stephanie M Flood; Kirstin N Lane; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Jean-Philippe Chaput Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Sarah A Moore; Leigh M Vanderloo; Catherine S Birken; Laurene A Rehman Journal: Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im; Dominique Beaulieu; Stéphane Turcotte; Joanie Roussel-Ouellet; Valérie Labbé; Danielle Bouchard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 4.614