| Literature DB >> 35481193 |
Mariangela Oggianu1,2, Cristiana Figus3, Suchithra Ashoka-Sahadevan1,2, Noemi Monni1,2, Daniela Marongiu3, Michele Saba3, Andrea Mura3,2, Giovanni Bongiovanni3, Claudia Caltagirone1,2, Vito Lippolis1,2, Carla Cannas1,2, Enzo Cadoni1,2, Maria Laura Mercuri1,2, Francesco Quochi3,2.
Abstract
The potential of silicon-based fluorescent platforms for the detection of trace toxic metal ions was investigated in an aqueous environment. To this aim, silicon chips were first functionalized with amino groups, and fluorescein organic dyes, used as sensing molecules, were then covalently linked to the surface via formation of thiourea groups. The obtained hybrid heterostructures exhibited high sensitivity and selectivity towards copper(ii), a limit of detection compatible with the recommended upper limits for copper in drinking water, and good reversibility using a standard metal-chelating agent. The fluorophore-analyte interaction mechanism at the basis of the reported fluorescence quenching, as well as the potential of performance improvement, were also studied. The herein presented sensing architecture allows, in principle, tailoring of the selectivity towards other metal ions by proper fluorophore selection, and provides a favorable outlook for integration of fluorescent chemosensors with silicon photonics technology. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35481193 PMCID: PMC9029085 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra02695j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(a) Chemical precursors used for functionalization of (100)-oriented silicon chips. (b) Step 1: surface silica layer deposition bearing hydroxy groups via the sol–gel method using TEOS (left); Step 2: amino-functionalization of the silica surface with APTES (centre, amino groups highlighted in blue). Step 3: functionalization with FITC (right), leading to the formation of thiourea groups (highlighted in red).
Fig. 2Pictures of a distilled water drop laid onto: (a) a silica layer on silicon substrate (Si@SiO2); (b) APTES grafted onto the silica layer (Si@SiO2@APTES); (c) FITC-functionalized system (Si@SiO2@APTES@FITC). Horizontal white bars correspond to 2 mm. (d) Histograms showing the evolution of the mean water contact angle value after each deposition step. Standard errors are indicated.
Fig. 3(a) Reflectance spectrum of n-doped (100)-oriented silicon substrate (black line); spectral reflectance ratios measured upon sequential layer deposition/functionalization: Si@SiO2-to-Si, Si@SiO2@APTES-to-Si@SiO2, and Si@SiO2@APTES@FITC-to-Si@SiO2@APTES ratios (grey, blue and red lines, respectively). Inset of panel (a): model estimate of Si@SiO2-to-Si reflectance ratio vs. SiO2 layer thickness (see text for details). Spectral reflectance ratio plotted on a vertical scale expanded around unity for: (b) Si@SiO2@APTES-to-Si@SiO2; (c) Si@SiO2@APTES@FITC-to-Si@SiO2@APTES; (d) Si@SiO2@APTES@FITC after dipping into a CuII aqueous solution (1.3 × 10−4 mol L−1). All panels: Thick lines are the mean signal values; thin lines are the mean values increased and decreased by their standard errors.
Fig. 4(a) Fluorescence intensity (F) spectrum of the Si@SiO2@APTES@FITC heterostructure. Red curves: fluorescence spectrum in air. FITC and SiO2 contributions to the whole spectrum are shown as the violet and grey lines, respectively. Thick lines are the mean signal values; thin lines are the mean values increased and decreased by their standard errors. (b) Normalized fluorescence spectrum of FITC in ethanol (1.2 × 10−5 mol L−1) and water (<10−5 mol L−1) solutions (magenta and olive line, respectively). (c) Normalized fluorescence decay curves of FITC in ethanol and water solution (magenta and olive line, respectively). Red curve: fluorescence decay transient of the device. Excitation wavelength was 355 nm.
Fig. 5Sensing performance characterization of silicon-based fluorescent chips in aqueous MOPS buffer at pH = 7.2 (excitation wavelength of 355 nm). (a) Spectrally-integrated fluorescence intensity changes in response to equimolar (1.3 × 10−4 mol L−1) solutions of various metal ions. CuII mass concentration (in ppm) is also indicated. Standard error bars are reported. F0 is the reference value (at 0 ppm) of the fluorescence intensity signal. (b) Red lines: fluorescence spectrum of the unperturbed sensor; grey lines: fluorescence spectrum measured upon addition of 8.4 ppm of CuII ions. Thick lines are the mean signal values; thin lines are the mean values augmented and diminished by their standard errors. (c) Titration curve for the fluorescence intensity reduction (F/F0) vs. CuII concentration. Best fit of a linear decay function to the data in the low concentration regime is shown as dashed red line. A signal loss coefficient of 0.15 ppm−1 was inferred. Green line: best fit of model function, based on FITC–CuII interaction mechanism at equilibrium, to experimental data (see, also, Fig. S4, ESI†). (d) Sensor regeneration tests. Fluorescence turn-off behaviour of the device in a CuII water solution (8.4 ppm) and signal recovery after each regeneration cycle in EDTA solution. Here, F0 refers to the initial fluorescence intensity (at 0 ppm) before the regeneration test started.