| Literature DB >> 35480581 |
Peihua Li1, Jia Rui1, Yan Niu2, Fang Xie1, Yifang Wang1, Zhuoyang Li1, Chan Liu1, Shanshan Yu1, Jiefeng Huang1, Li Luo1, Bin Deng1, Weikang Liu1, Tianlong Yang1, Qun Li2, Tianmu Chen1.
Abstract
Background: Hand-Foot-and-Mouth-Disease (HFMD) has been widely spread in Asia, and has result in a high disease burden for children in many countries. However, the dissemination characteristics intergroup and between different age groups are still not clear. In this study, we aim to analyze the differences in the transmissibility of HFMD, in the whole population and among age groups in Shenzhen city, by utilizing mathematical models.Entities:
Keywords: HFMD; age group; children; infectious diseases; mathematical model
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35480581 PMCID: PMC9035867 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.850369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1The Susceptive-Infected-Recovered model.
Figure 2The cross-age groups Susceptive-Infected-Recovered model.
Parameter estimation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | Inter-individual propagation coefficient | Seen text | ≥0 | Curve fitting |
| γ | Relative recovery rate | 1/14 | - | References |
|
| Population birth rate | 3.52 × 10−4 | 3.30 × 10−4-3.83 × 10−4 | Analysis on the reported data |
|
| Population mortality rate | 1.29 × 10−5 | 1.27 × 10−5-1.87 × 10−5 | Analysis on the reported data |
|
| Case fatality rate | 0.0003 | 0–1 | References |
Figure 3The Map of HMFD burden distribution in Shenzhen city.
Figure 4Fitting results for HMFD incidence rates in Shenzhen city and its districts.
The P values of multiple comparisons for different districts (LSD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baoan district | ||||||
| Futian district | 0 | |||||
| Nanshan district | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Yantian district | 0 | 0.0002 | 0 | |||
| Luohu district | 0 | 0.7209 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Longgang district | 0 | 0.0006 | 0 | 0.7404 | 0.0020 |
α = 0.05.
Figure 5Fitting results for EV71 incidence rates by age group.
The P values and fitted R2 values for each group.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 years old group | 0.818 | <0.0001 |
| 3–5 years old group | 0.715 | <0.0001 |
| >5 years old group | 0.726 | <0.0001 |
The weekly transmission coefficients β for each age group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1–8 | 0.228 | 0.245 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.097 | 0.030 | 0.003 |
| 8–29 | 0.127 | 0.120 | 0.004 | 0.014 | 0.007 | 0.069 | 0.014 | 0.149 | 0.002 | |
| 29–52 | 0.128 | 0.149 | 0.023 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.038 | 0.023 | 0.016 | 0.001 | |
| 2011 | 1–5 | |||||||||
| 5–33 | 0.018 | 0.096 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.009 | 0.190 | 0.000 | 0.045 | 0.005 | |
| 34–52 | 0.260 | 0.221 | 0.129 | 0.009 | 0.023 | 0.157 | 0.011 | 0.052 | 0.436 | |
| 2012 | 1–8 | |||||||||
| 9–36 | 0.118 | 0.161 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.044 | 0.025 | 0.197 | 0.000 | |
| 37–52 | 0.079 | 0.069 | 0.046 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | |
| 2013 | 1–5 | |||||||||
| 6–12 | 0.226 | 0.194 | 0.024 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.182 | 0.001 | 0.091 | 0.075 | |
| 13–40 | 0.076 | 0.035 | 0.214 | 0.108 | 0.000 | 0.138 | 0.000 | 0.046 | 0.085 | |
| 41–52 | 0.427 | 0.294 | 0.225 | 0.142 | 0.031 | 0.251 | 0.027 | 0.083 | 0.456 | |
| 2014 | 1–8 | |||||||||
| 9–45 | 0.254 | 0.050 | 0.039 | 0.114 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.046 | 0.003 | |
| 45–52 | 0.222 | 0.145 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.010 | 0.114 | 0.004 | 0.123 | 0.681 | |
| 2015 | 1–10 | |||||||||
| 11–48 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | |
| 48–53 | 0.127 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.099 | 0.006 | 0.248 | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.456 | |
| 2016 | 1–23 | |||||||||
| 24–52 | 0.242 | 0.017 | 0.008 | 0.099 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 | 0.110 | |
| 2017 | 1–27 | 0.043 | 0.055 | 0.001 | 0.050 | 0.020 | 0.151 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.076 |
| 27–53 | 0.000 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 0.026 | 0.004 | 1.036 | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.007 |
Figure 6The transimissibility of the first stage.
Figure 7The transimissibility of the second stage (A) Group1 indicates the R value of 0–2years old age group; Group 2 indicates the R value of 3–5 years old age group; Group 3 indicates the R value of over 5 years old age group; (B) Rij denotes the transmission coefficient from individuals in age group i to individuals in age group j, which both i and j take the value 1, 2, 3.