| Literature DB >> 35479639 |
Lei Xing1,2, Qiqi Zhi3, Xi Hu2, Lulu Liu2, Heng Xu2, Ting Zhou2, Huaqun Yin3, Zhenxie Yi1, Juan Li1.
Abstract
Revealing community assembly and their impacts on ecosystem service is a core issue in microbial ecology. However, what ecological factors play dominant roles in phyllosphere fungal community assembly and how they link to crop quality are largely unknown. Here, we applied internal transcriptional spacer high-throughput sequencing to investigate foliar fungal community assembly across three cultivars of a Solanaceae crop (tobacco) and two planting regions with different climatic conditions. Network analyses were used to reveal the pattern in foliar fungal co-occurrence, and phylogenetic null model analysis was used to elucidate the ecological assembly of foliar fungal communities. We found that the sensory quality of crop leaves and the composition of foliar fungal community varied significantly across planting regions and cultivars. In Guangcun (GC), a region with relatively high humidity and low precipitation, there was a higher diversity and more unique fungal species than the region of Wuzhishan (WZS). Further, we found that the association network of foliar fungal communities in GC was more complex than that in WZS, and the network properties were closely related to the sensory quality of crop. Finally, the results of the phylogenetic analyses show that the stochastic processes played important roles in the foliar fungal community assembly, and their relative importance was significantly correlated with the sensory quality of crop leaves, which implies that ecological assembly processes could affect crop quality. Taken together, our results highlight that climatic conditions, and plant cultivars play key roles in the assembly of foliar fungal communities and crop quality, which enhances our understanding of the connections between the phyllosphere microbiome and ecosystem services, especially in agricultural production.Entities:
Keywords: crop quality; fungi; microbial community; network; null model; phyllosphere; phylogenetic structure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35479639 PMCID: PMC9037085 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.783923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1(A) Heatmap for sensory quality of crop leaves. Color represents the scores of sensory qualities. Clustering analysis was based on Euclidean distance. (B) Principal components analysis for sensory quality of crop leaves across three crop cultivars and two planting regions. Color denotes different crop cultivars. Shape denotes different regions.
FIGURE 2(A) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray–Curtis similarity index of foliar fungal community. The composition of foliar fungal community varied significantly across planting regions and cultivars. (B) Difference of fungal phylogenetic diversity based on Kruskal–Wallis test between the two regions (GC and WZS, *p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3The association network of foliar fungal community. Node color represents different modules. The network pattern was visualized by Gephi software. (A) The network of all samples in two regions. (B) The subnetwork of the samples in GC. (C) The subnetwork of the samples in WZS.
FIGURE 4Pearson correlations between the network properties and the sensory quality of crop leaves. The shadow indicates the 95% confidence interval. The miscellaneous gas: protein smell was significantly related with the transitivity (p < 0.01). The fragrance: honey, the mellowness of aroma: mellowness, and maturity were significantly related with diameter (p < 0.01).
Topological properties of molecular ecological subnetworks in foliar fungal communities on crop leaves across crop cultivars and plating regions.
| Group | Nodes | Links | Density | Transitivity | Modularity | Centralization of degree | Average path distances | Diameter |
| GC-HY101 | 186 (18)a | 2,705 (585)a | 0.156 (0.015)a | 0.919 (0.024)a | 0.124 (0.02)a | 0.242 (0.004)a | 2.948 (0.248)a | 7.911 (0.937)a |
| GC-HY109 | 450 (317)a | 90,087 (145,523)a | 0.367 (0.366)a | 0.937 (0.057)a | 0.17 (0.215)a | 0.208 (0.092)a | 2.591 (1.2)a | 8.561 (2.976)a |
| GC-HY201 | 233 (24)a | 3,076 (1,294)a | 0.113 (0.046)a | 0.923 (0.047)a | 0.359 (0.191)a | 0.179 (0.047)a | 3.518 (0.64)a | 7.96 (1.251)a |
| WZS-HY101 | 148 (22)a | 1,272 (509)a | 0.125 (0.075)a | 0.901 (0.021)a | 0.312 (0.199)a | 0.195 (0.05)a | 2.71 (0.569)a | 7.226 (1.793)a |
| WZS-HY109 | 191 (99)a | 3,517 (4,727)a | 0.123 (0.062)a | 0.922 (0.064)a | 0.257 (0.038)a | 0.215 (0.049)a | 2.92 (0.517)a | 7.73 (1.821)a |
| WZS-HY201 | 173 (14)a | 2,739 (1,155)a | 0.178 (0.055)a | 0.927 (0.026)a | 0.151 (0.016)a | 0.246 (0.022)a | 2.745 (0.337)a | 7.206 (1.586)a |
Values in parentheses are standard deviation (n = 3). The letter label means there are no statistical significances (p < 0.05) of network properties among groups, which is tested by multiple comparisons by means of least significant difference, and p-value is adjusted by the Bonferroni method.
FIGURE 5(A) Boxplots for net relatedness index (NRI) for foliar fungal communities. (B) Boxplots for nearest taxon index (NTI) for foliar fungal communities. Different small letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ecological processes of community assembly for foliar fungi of crop leaves.
| Sample | Dispersal limitation | Even dispersal | Drift |
| GC-HY101 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| GC-HY201 | 33 | 0 | 67 |
| GC-HY109 | 33 | 67 | 0 |
| WZS-HY101 | 33 | 0 | 67 |
| WZS-HY201 | 67 | 0 | 33 |
| WZS-HY109 | 33 | 0 | 67 |
The impact of ecological environment factors and crop cultivar on the structure of the foliar fungal community using permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices based on Bray–Curtis similarity index.
|
| Sum of sequence |
|
|
| |
| Planting region | 1 | 72.83 | 0.32 | 2.61 | 0.0166 |
| Cultivar | 2 | 93.00 | 0.42 | 1.67 | 0.2333 |