| Literature DB >> 35478960 |
Chunkai Huang1,2,3, Mingyao Meng1,2,3, Shuo Li1,2,3, Shiyuan Liu1,2,3, Lin Li1,2,3, Yanjun Su4, Hui Gao1,2,3, Shan He1,2,3, Yiyi Zhao1,2,3, Min Zhang4, Zongliu Hou1,2,3, Wenju Wang1,2,3, Xiaodan Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
The therapeutic effects and mechanism of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSC) on kidney injury in MRL/Ipr mice were studied. UC-MSC, methylprednisolone (MP), and their combination were used to treat MRL/Ipr mice. The therapeutic effects were evaluated by renal function assessment, and HE, PAS, and Masson staining were carried out on renal tissues and visualized by electron microscopy. Subsequently, podocyte injury was detected by the presence of podocin in renal tissues by immunofluorescence. To further explore the mechanism, serum TGF-β1 was measured, and TGF-β1, p-Smad3, and TRAF6 in the renal tissue were detected by Western blotting. In vitro, TGF-β1 was used to stimulate podocytes, and the podocyte activity and changes in synaptopodin were observed after UC-MSC treatment. Significant improvements in renal function and pathological injury were observed in the UC-MSC group compared to the lupus nephritis (LN) model group. UC-MSC and MP treatment improved podocyte injury in MRL/Ipr mice. Western blot examination showed a significant increase in TGF-β1, p-Smad3, and TRAF6 expression in renal tissues of the LN model group, while significant downregulation of those proteins was observed in the UC-MSC group. After TGF-β1 stimulation in vitro, podocyte activity decreased, and UC-MSC treatment improved podocyte activity and restored synaptopodin expression. UC-MSC therapy could improve the deterioration of renal function and the pathological changes of the renal tissues in MRL/Ipr mice. Our study suggested that UC-MSC may improve kidney injury and podocyte injury in LN mice by inhibiting the TGF-β1 pathway.Entities:
Keywords: TGF-β1; TRAF6; lupus nephritis; p-Smad3; podocytes; umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 35478960 PMCID: PMC9037034 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.876054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Morphology and phenotype identification of UC-MSC. The morphology of UC-MSC is shown at ×50 magnification (A) or at ×200 magnification (B). (C,D) UC-MSC were successfully differentiated into osteoblasts, which were verified by Alizarin Red staining. Representative photos were taken of the control group (C) and the induction group (D) at ×100 magnification. (E,F) UC-MSC were successfully differentiated into adipocytes through oil red “O” staining. Representative photos were taken of the control group (E) and the induction group (F) at ×200 magnification. (G,H) UC-MSC were successfully differentiated into the cartilage cells, which were identified by simple blue dye. Representative photos were taken of the control group (G) and the induction group (H) at ×100 magnification. The surface markers of UC-MSC, including CD90, CD105, CD73, CD45, CD34, CD11b, CD19, and HLA-DR, were analyzed by flow cytometry. Among them, the positive rates of CD90, CD105, and CD73 were above 99%. Others were almost always negatively expressed (I–L).
FIGURE 2Changes of renal function, serum ds-DNA, and serum TGF-β1 level. Comparison of biochemical measurement. (A) Blood serum creatinine level (mmol/L); (B) blood urea nitrogen level (μmol/L); (C) serum ds-DNA level (U/mL); (D) serum TGF-β1 level (pg/ml) vs. LN group: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3Pathological and electron microscopy results of the renal tissue. HE staining (first line, ×400), PAS staining (second line, ×400), Masson staining (third line, ×400), electron microscopy (fourth line), and podocin immunofluorescence staining (fifth line, ×400). Normal group (first column), LN group (second column), UC-MSC group (third column), MP group (fourth column), and UC-MSC + MP group (fifth column).
FIGURE 4Protein expression of TGF-β1, TRAF6, and p-Smad3 in renal tissues. Western blot results of TGF-β1, TRAF6, and p-Smad3 expression of in renal tissues. (A) Western blot results of TGF-β1, TRAF6, and p-Smad3. (B) Comparison of TGF-β1, TRAF6, and p-Smad3 protein expression vs. LN group: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5UC-MSC restored activity and synaptopodin expression in podocytes stimulated by TGF-β1. (A) Comparison of the podocyte activity. (B) Western blot results of synaptopodin. (C) Comparison of synaptopodin protein expression. ns: no significance; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.