Gintaras Zaleskis1, Dainius Characiejus2, Jurgita Jursenaite3, Lavija Zibutyte4, Karolina Kriauciunaite3, Milda Vanagaite-Zickiene3, Adas Darinskas5, Mantas Jonusis6, Vita Pasukoniene5,7. 1. Laboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania; gintaras.zaleskis@nvi.lt. 2. Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. 3. Department of Immunology, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania. 4. Faculty of Chemistry and Geosciences of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. 5. Laboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania. 6. LSC Institute of Biochemistry, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. 7. Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Concomitant immunity (CIM) is a phenomenon that elicits an antitumor response not sufficient enough to destroy the primary tumor but prevents a secondary implant from growing and spreading. This study aimed to develop a method of identification of serum tumoricidal factors released into circulation during CIM and to compare the CIM-related effect to the effect elicited by the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SL2 tumor-bearing mice were studied at three time points - day 4, day 7, and day 11 following i.p. 5×105 cell implantation. Hematological effects and thymocyte immunophenotyping (CD4/CD8) data were compared to the effects induced by intravenous 10 mg/kg doxorubicin (DOX) administration to intact DBA 2 mice. The level of plasma colony stimulating factor-granulocyte macrophage (CSF-GM) was evaluated by ELISA. RESULTS: Identical thymus histopathology and an extent of double-positive CD4+CD8+ subset depletion was found in day 11 tumor-bearing mice (TBM-11) and in DOX-administered animals. TBM-11 exhibited a leukemoid reaction with an increase in monocyte and granulocyte counts. Conversely, DOX administration was followed by severe leukocytopenia at the 72-h time point. No increase in CSF-GM was observed in mice with or without a leukemoid reaction. CONCLUSION: The complexity of CIM can be examined by tracking alterations in the most fragile cortical CD8+CD4+ double positive population. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by DOX and TBM-11 might be associated with different mechanisms. TBM-11 did not exhibit severe myelotoxicity as DOX did. CIM-related serum factors can be assessed and screened via thymocyte subset analysis.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Concomitant immunity (CIM) is a phenomenon that elicits an antitumor response not sufficient enough to destroy the primary tumor but prevents a secondary implant from growing and spreading. This study aimed to develop a method of identification of serum tumoricidal factors released into circulation during CIM and to compare the CIM-related effect to the effect elicited by the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SL2 tumor-bearing mice were studied at three time points - day 4, day 7, and day 11 following i.p. 5×105 cell implantation. Hematological effects and thymocyte immunophenotyping (CD4/CD8) data were compared to the effects induced by intravenous 10 mg/kg doxorubicin (DOX) administration to intact DBA 2 mice. The level of plasma colony stimulating factor-granulocyte macrophage (CSF-GM) was evaluated by ELISA. RESULTS: Identical thymus histopathology and an extent of double-positive CD4+CD8+ subset depletion was found in day 11 tumor-bearing mice (TBM-11) and in DOX-administered animals. TBM-11 exhibited a leukemoid reaction with an increase in monocyte and granulocyte counts. Conversely, DOX administration was followed by severe leukocytopenia at the 72-h time point. No increase in CSF-GM was observed in mice with or without a leukemoid reaction. CONCLUSION: The complexity of CIM can be examined by tracking alterations in the most fragile cortical CD8+CD4+ double positive population. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by DOX and TBM-11 might be associated with different mechanisms. TBM-11 did not exhibit severe myelotoxicity as DOX did. CIM-related serum factors can be assessed and screened via thymocyte subset analysis.
Authors: Rukhsana Sultana; Fabio Di Domenico; Michael Tseng; Jian Cai; Teresa Noel; R Lakshman Chelvarajan; William D Pierce; Ciara Cini; Subbarao Bondada; Daret K St Clair; D Allan Butterfield Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: D J Stewart; D Grewaal; R M Green; N Mikhael; R Goel; V A Montpetit; M D Redmond Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 1993 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Line V Hjelle; Per O M Gundersen; Ragnhild Hellesnes; Mette Sprauten; Marianne Brydøy; Torgrim Tandstad; Tom Wilsgaard; Sophie D Fosså; Jan Oldenburg; Roy M Bremnes; Hege S Haugnes Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Sara Lopez-Tarruella; M J Escudero; Marina Pollan; Miguel Martín; Carlos Jara; Begoña Bermejo; Angel Guerrero-Zotano; José García-Saenz; Ana Santaballa; Emilio Alba; Raquel Andrés; Purificación Martínez; Lourdes Calvo; Antonio Fernández; Norberto Batista; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Antonio Antón; Ainhara Lahuerta; Juan de la Haba; José Manuel López-Vega; E Carrasco Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Benjamin A Gartrell; Mack Roach; Avi Retter; Gerald H Sokol; Giuseppe Del Priore; Howard I Scher Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2020-09-13 Impact factor: 3.651