Anas Barakat1,2, Aemn Ismail3, Supratik Chattopadhyay3,2. 1. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, U.K.; anas.barakat1@nhs.net. 2. Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K. 3. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, U.K.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) introduced a new curriculum in 2019. Furthermore, the National Health Service was hit by the COVID 19 pandemic in 2020. Our survey aims to find how the new RCOG curriculum and COVID 19 pandemic affected gynaecological training amongst specialist trainees in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted using the University of Leicester online survey platform involving the RCOG trainees in the UK from the 1st of June 2021 to the 1st of October 2021. The survey was divided into two main categories: 1) new RCOG curriculum and gynaecology training, 2) COVID 19 pandemic and gynaecology training. RESULTS: We received replies from 10% of trainees. The quality of gynaecology training under the new RCOG curriculum was described as less than good in 75.6% of respondents. Around one-third (29.2%) of trainees did not have local gynaecology simulation training. The COVID 19 pandemic adversely affected all aspects of gynaecology training. Benign gynaecology, subfertility, urogynaecology, and gynaeoncology modules training were affected in 94.0%, 85.1%, 89.7%, and 83.5% of trainees, respectively. During the pandemic, gynaecology teaching was affected in 84.9% of trainees, redeployment occurred in 11.8% of trainees, and 16% suffered adverse ARCP outcomes. CONCLUSION: The new RCOG curriculum and COVID 19 pandemic have simultaneously compromised the gynaecology training amongst the UK trainees. RCOG and GMC-led more comprehensive survey would be welcomed to incorporate our findings and take necessary actions.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) introduced a new curriculum in 2019. Furthermore, the National Health Service was hit by the COVID 19 pandemic in 2020. Our survey aims to find how the new RCOG curriculum and COVID 19 pandemic affected gynaecological training amongst specialist trainees in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted using the University of Leicester online survey platform involving the RCOG trainees in the UK from the 1st of June 2021 to the 1st of October 2021. The survey was divided into two main categories: 1) new RCOG curriculum and gynaecology training, 2) COVID 19 pandemic and gynaecology training. RESULTS: We received replies from 10% of trainees. The quality of gynaecology training under the new RCOG curriculum was described as less than good in 75.6% of respondents. Around one-third (29.2%) of trainees did not have local gynaecology simulation training. The COVID 19 pandemic adversely affected all aspects of gynaecology training. Benign gynaecology, subfertility, urogynaecology, and gynaeoncology modules training were affected in 94.0%, 85.1%, 89.7%, and 83.5% of trainees, respectively. During the pandemic, gynaecology teaching was affected in 84.9% of trainees, redeployment occurred in 11.8% of trainees, and 16% suffered adverse ARCP outcomes. CONCLUSION: The new RCOG curriculum and COVID 19 pandemic have simultaneously compromised the gynaecology training amongst the UK trainees. RCOG and GMC-led more comprehensive survey would be welcomed to incorporate our findings and take necessary actions.
Authors: Tom Bourne; Harsha Shah; Nora Falconieri; Dirk Timmerman; Christoph Lees; Alison Wright; Mary Ann Lumsden; Lesley Regan; Ben Van Calster Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 2.692