| Literature DB >> 35476452 |
Fu-Hui Xiao1,2, Qin Yu1,2, Zhi-Li Deng3,4,5, Ke Yang2,6,7, Yunshuang Ye2,6,7, Ming-Xia Ge1,2,6,8,9, Dongjing Yan10, Hao-Tian Wang1,2,6,8,9, Xiao-Qiong Chen1, Li-Qin Yang1, Bin-Yu Yang1, Rong Lin11, Wen Zhang10, Xing-Li Yang1, Lei Dong1, Yonghan He1, Jumin Zhou2,7,9, Wang-Wei Cai10, Ji Li3,4,5, Qing-Peng Kong1,2,8,9.
Abstract
Adaptation to reduced energy production during aging is a fundamental issue for maintaining healthspan or prolonging life span. Currently, however, the underlying mechanism in long-lived people remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed transcriptomes of 185 long-lived individuals (LLIs) and 86 spouses of their children from two independent Chinese longevity cohorts and found that the ribosome pathway was significantly down-regulated in LLIs. We found that the down-regulation is likely controlled by ETS1 (ETS proto-oncogene 1), a transcription factor down-regulated in LLIs and positively coexpressed with most ribosomal protein genes (RPGs). Functional assays showed that ETS1 can bind to RPG promoters, while ETS1 knockdown reduces RPG expression and alleviates cellular senescence in human dermal fibroblast (HDF) and embryonic lung fibroblast (IMR-90) cells. As protein synthesis/turnover in ribosomes is an energy-intensive cellular process, the decline in ribosomal biogenesis governed by ETS1 in certain female LLIs may serve as an alternative mechanism to achieve energy-saving and healthy aging.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35476452 PMCID: PMC9045719 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.957
Fig. 1.DEGs between the LLI and F1SP groups from the discovery (i.e., LS) cohort.
(A) Venn diagram for the identified DEGs. Number with red color represents the genes with expression differences between LLI and F1SP groups by methods of DESeq2 and regression analysis but without associations between their expression and age in F1SP samples. (B) Percentage of up- and down-regulated genes in LLIs. (C) Expression differences in LLI-specific DEGs. (D) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for LLI-specific DEGs. TNF, tumor necrosis factor. (E) Expression differences for lowly expressed RPGs in LLI samples.
Fig. 2.Identification of key regulators governing LLI-specific RPG transcription patterns in discovery cohort.
(A) TF-binding site motif analysis for down-regulated RPGs in LLIs. Elk1, ETS transcription factor Elk1; ERG, ETS transcription factor ERG; ELF1, E74 like ETS transcription factor 1; GABPA, GA binding protein transcription factor subunit alpha. (B) ETS1 shows reduced expression in LLIs. (C) Heatmap plot shows that LLIs with low ETS1 expression have reduced RPG expression. (D) ETS1 is coexpressed with 53 down-regulated RPGs. FC, fold change.
Fig. 3.DEG analysis in replication (i.e., LG) cohort.
(A) Venn plot for DEGs in LLIs. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment for DEGs. (C) ETS1 is down-regulated in LLIs. (D) ETS1 is coexpressed with 44 down-regulated RPGs. (E) RT-qPCR validation for the expression of ETS1 and three RPGs between LLIs and F1SPs. *P < 0.05.
Fig. 4.Functional studies of the down-regulated ETS1 at cellular level.
(A) Down-regulated genes in ETS1 knockdown (ETS1-KD) 293T cells were significantly enriched in ribosome pathway. MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase. (B) Heatmap for down-regulated RPGs in ETS1 knockdown 293T cells. (C) Senescence-associated galactosidase beta 1 (SA-β-Gal) staining cells ratio in HDF cells. Typical images are shown on top and SA-β-Gal staining cell ratio is shown on bottom. Data are presented as means ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates. (D) RT-qPCR for the expression levels of CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2A (p16) in HDF cells. n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Their protein levels were validated by Western blot. (E) The expression of SASP genes was reduced in ETS1 knockdown HDF cells. n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as means ± SEM. (F) Cumulative population doubling level (CPDL) of the HDF cells. (G) EdU-staining cell ratio in HDF cells. n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as means ± SEM. (H) Heatmap plot for the 61 RPGs with significant expression differences in ETS1 knockdown and control HDF cells. (I) ETS1 binding to RPL3 and RPL13A gene promoters in HDF cells at passage 20 measured by ChIP-qPCR (C, control; P, positive). n = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.