Literature DB >> 35475671

The Use of Disinfectant in Barn Cleaning Alters Microbial Composition and Increases Carriage of Campylobacter jejuni in Broiler Chickens.

Yi Fan1, Andrew J Forgie1, Tingting Ju1, Camila Marcolla1, Tom Inglis2, Lynn M McMullen1, Benjamin P Willing1, Douglas R Korver1.   

Abstract

To maintain food safety and flock health in broiler chicken production, biosecurity approaches to keep chicken barns free of pathogens are important. Canadian broiler chicken producers must deep clean their barns with chemical disinfectants at least once annually (full disinfection [FD]) and may wash with water (water wash [WW]) throughout the year. However, many producers use FD after each flock, assuming a greater efficacy of more stringent cleaning protocols, although little information is known regarding how these two cleaning practices affect pathogen population and gut microbiota. In the present study, a crossover experiment over four production cycles was conducted in seven commercial chicken barns to compare WW and FD. We evaluated the effects of barn cleaning methods on commercial broiler performance, cecal microbiota composition, Campylobacter and Salmonella occurrence, and Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens abundance, as well as on short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in the month-old broiler gut. The 30-day body weight and mortality rate were not affected by the barn cleaning methods. The WW resulted in a modest but significant effect on the structure of broiler cecal microbiota (weighted-UniFrac; adonis P = 0.05, and unweighted-UniFrac; adonis P = 0.01), with notable reductions in C. jejuni occurrence and abundance. In addition, the WW group had increased cecal acetate, butyrate, and total SCFA concentrations, which were negatively correlated with C. jejuni abundance. Our results suggest that WW may result in enhanced activity of the gut microbiota and reduced zoonotic transmission of C. jejuni in broiler production relative to FD in the absence of a disease challenge. IMPORTANCE We compared the effects of barn FD and WW methods on gut microbial community structures and pathogen prevalence of broiler chickens in a nonchallenging commercial production setting. The results revealed that barn cleaning methods had little impact on the 30-day body weight and mortality rate of broiler chickens. In addition, the FD treatment had a subtle but significant effect on the broiler cecal microbiota with increased abundances of Campylobacter and decreased SCFA concentrations, which would support the adoption of WW as a standard practice. Thus, compared to FD, WW can be beneficial to broiler chicken production by inhibiting zoonotic pathogen colonization in the chicken gut with reduced cost and labor of cleaning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barn disinfection; broiler chicken; gut microbiota; pathogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35475671      PMCID: PMC9128520          DOI: 10.1128/aem.00295-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   5.005


  51 in total

1.  Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Stuart E Denman; Robert J Hughes; Mark S Geier; Tamsyn M Crowley; Honglei Chen; Volker R Haring; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-chain Fatty Acids.

Authors:  Bart van der Hee; Jerry M Wells
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Bacillus and relatives in foodborne illness.

Authors:  N A Logan
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pullorum infections in broilers.

Authors:  Liesbeth M Ceelen; Annemie Decostere; Koen Chiers; Richard Ducatelle; Dominiek Maes; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Campylobacter jejuni colonization promotes the translocation of Escherichia coli to extra-intestinal organs and disturbs the short-chain fatty acids profiles in the chicken gut.

Authors:  W A Awad; F Dublecz; C Hess; K Dublecz; B Khayal; J R Aschenbach; M Hess
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Broiler Chicken Cecal and Fecal Microbiomes and Correlations of Bacterial Taxa with Cytokine Gene Expression.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Michael H Kogut
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

7.  The local immune response of mice after Helicobacter suis infection: strain differences and distinction with Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Bram Flahou; Kim Van Deun; Frank Pasmans; Annemieke Smet; Jiri Volf; Ivan Rychlik; Richard Ducatelle; Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 8.  Hygiene: microbial strategies to reduce pathogens and drug resistance in clinical settings.

Authors:  Elisabetta Caselli
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  Supplementation of amylase combined with glucoamylase or protease changes intestinal microbiota diversity and benefits for broilers fed a diet of newly harvested corn.

Authors:  Dafei Yin; Xiaonan Yin; Xingyu Wang; Zhao Lei; Maofei Wang; Yuming Guo; Samuel E Aggrey; Wei Nie; Jianmin Yuan
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-12

10.  Bacillus spp. Contamination: A Novel Risk Originated From Animal Feed to Human Food Chains in South-Eastern Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Atiqul Haque; Fei Wang; Yi Chen; Foysal Hossen; Md Aminul Islam; Md Amzad Hossain; Naila Siddique; Cheng He; Firoz Ahmed
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.