Mohammed B Alshammari1, Ashraf A Aly2, Stefan Bräse3,4, Martin Nieger5, Lamiaa E Abd El-Haleem2. 1. Chemistry Department, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. 10, Box 83, Al-Kharij 11942, Saudi Arabia. 2. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, 61519 El-Minia, Egypt. 3. Institute of Organic Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany. 4. Institute of Biological and Chemical Systems (IBCS-FMS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. 5. Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 55 (A. I. Virtasen Aukio I), 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
The strategies of the syntheses of various (thio)ureas, semicarbazides, thiosemicarbazides, thiazolidones, and oxadiazole derived from the [2.2]paracyclophane molecule are achieved starting with 4-(2.2]paracyclophanyl)isocyanate. The structures of the obtained products were elucidated by NMR, mass spectrometry, and infrared (IR) spectroscopy in addition to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). X-ray structure analysis was also used to prove the assigned structure.
The strategies of the syntheses of various (thio)ureas, semicarbazides, thiosemicarbazides, thiazolidones, and oxadiazole derived from the [2.2]paracyclophane molecule are achieved starting with 4-(2.2]paracyclophanyl)isocyanate. The structures of the obtained products were elucidated by NMR, mass spectrometry, and infrared (IR) spectroscopy in addition to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). X-ray structure analysis was also used to prove the assigned structure.
[2.2]Paracyclophane (PC)
chemistry has evolved from the functional
molecules to functional materials and from the synthetic curiosity
to emerging applications in asymmetric synthesis, energy materials,
π-stacked polymers, and functional parylene coatings (i.e. polymer
made by polymerization of PC induced by vapor-phase pyrolysis).[1−4] [2.2]Paracyclophane is also described as a rigid molecule within
the interior of the conjugated segment with an otherwise similar aspect
ratio to the phenylene unit. The intermolecular interactions in PC
involving aromatic rings are the key processes in both chemical and
biological recognition.[5]Recently,
it has been shown that connecting heterocycles with the
PC moiety showed anticancer activity as in the case of paracyclophanyl-dihydronaphtho[2,3-d]thiazoles and paracyclophanyl-thiazolium bromides.[6] Among the following three assigned series I−III of the synthesized paracyclophanyl-heterocycles
(Figure ), series
I having 1,4-dihydronaphthoquinone, was found as more active as antiproliferative
agents than their naphthalene-containing congeners (series II and
III) toward the SK-MEL-5 melanoma cell line.[6]
Figure 1
Different
series of paracyclophanyl-thiazole derivatives (I−III) as anticancer agents.
Different
series of paracyclophanyl-thiazole derivatives (I−III) as anticancer agents.Previously, we reported the various classes of connection between
PC and heterocycle moieties.[7] Aly et al.
synthesized heterocycles conjugated to [2.2]paracyclophane such as
five-membered rings (i.e., imidazolinone,[8] pyrrole,[9] triazolethiones, and substituted
oxadiazoles[10]) together with six-membered
rings (i.e., pyridine).[11,12]It was reported
that some marketed drugs had been found to contain
the N-acylhydrazone motif in their structures, e.g.,
azumolene, carbazochrome, dantrolene, nitrofurantoin, nitrofurazone,
nifuroxazide, and testosterone 17-enanthate 3-benzilic acid hydrazone.[13] More specifically, acylhydrazide-based compounds
have shown antioxidant activities.[14] Hydrazides
and carbohydrazides have been described as useful building blocks
for the assembly of various heterocyclic rings.[15−19] Ureas and thioureas in combination with benzothiazoles
were reported that they produced DNA topoisomerase or HIV reverse
transcriptase inhibitors.[20−22] 1,3,4-Oxadiazole heterocyclic
ring is one of the most important heterocyclic moieties due to its
versatile biological actions.[23] Based upon
the aforementioned, we are encouraged to incorporate a PC molecule
to (thio)urea, semicarbazides, thiosemicarbazide, thiazolidone, and
oxadiazole groups.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of 1N-Benzyl-3-N-[2.2]paracyclophanylurea (6) and N-(4′-[2.2]Paracyclo-phanyl)hydrazinecarboxamides 7a, 7b
The strategy of preparing compounds 6, 7a, and 7b was divided into two
parts: First, starting with the parent hydrocarbon 1 as
a commercial product, which was then converted into the acid chloride
derivative 3(24) by the procedure
described in Scheme . At the beginning, compound 1 was converted into 2 during reaction with oxalyl chloride/aluminum trichloride.
Then, heating 2 in refluxing chlorobenzene caused decarbonylation
to give 3. Subsequently, the resulting acid chloride 3 was subjected toward NaN3/acetone to give compound 4(24) (Scheme ). Heating 4 in toluene at 80
°C provided the corresponding isothionate 5(24) in 70% yield (Scheme ). Second, fusion of 5 with
benzylamine gave the corresponding urea 6 in 87% yield
(Scheme ). Based on
NMR, IR, mass spectra, as well as HRMS, the structure of compound 6 was satisfactorily proved. As the 1H NMR spectrum
indicated the appearance of the CH2 protons of compound 6 as a doublet at δH = 4.26 (J = 6.0 Hz). Whereas, the two NH protons appeared as two singlets
at δH = 7.73 and 6.75 ppm. In 13C NMR,
the CH2 and the carbonyl carbon signals resonated at δC = 42.9 and 158.1 ppm, respectively. On subjecting 5 with hydrazines by the procedure mentioned in Scheme , N-(4′-[2.2]paracyclophanyl)hydrazinecarboxamides 7a and 7b were obtained in very good yields (Scheme ). The structure
of the newly prepared compound 7a was established by
IR, NMR, mass spectra, as well as HRMS. The IR spectrum revealed a
diagnostic broad band at ṽ = 3352–3214
for NH groups, whereas the carbonyl group appeared at ṽ = 1632 cm–1. The 1H NMR spectrum exhibited
the NH-2 and NH-1 protons at δH = 7.59 and 6.88 ppm,
respectively. In addition, the characteristic hydrazine-NH2 resonated in the 1H NMR spectrum at δH = 4.72 ppm. The 13C NMR spectrum displayed the carbonyl-carbon
at δC = 157.3, whereas the four distinctive CH2-bridged carbons of PC resonated at δC =
35.4, 35.1, 32.9, and 32.3 ppm. HRMS proved the chemical formula of 7a as C17H19N3O.
Scheme 1
Synthesis
of 1N-Benzyl-3-N-[2.2]paracyclophanylurea
(6) and N-(4′-[2.2]Paracyclophanyl)hydrazinecarboxamides 7a and 7b
Reagents and conditions:
(A)
(COCl)2/AlCl3, −10 to 5 °C, 20 min;
(B) PhCl, Δ, 40 h; (C) NaN3, acetone/water, r.t.,
2 h; (D) toluene, 80 °C, 1 h; (E) PhCH2NH2/fusion, 100 °C, 10 h; (F) NH2NH2 as a
solvent, Δ, 20 h; (G) PhNHNH2, toluene, 20 h.
Synthesis
of 1N-Benzyl-3-N-[2.2]paracyclophanylurea
(6) and N-(4′-[2.2]Paracyclophanyl)hydrazinecarboxamides 7a and 7b
Reagents and conditions:
(A)
(COCl)2/AlCl3, −10 to 5 °C, 20 min;
(B) PhCl, Δ, 40 h; (C) NaN3, acetone/water, r.t.,
2 h; (D) toluene, 80 °C, 1 h; (E) PhCH2NH2/fusion, 100 °C, 10 h; (F) NH2NH2 as a
solvent, Δ, 20 h; (G) PhNHNH2, toluene, 20 h.For compound 7b, HRMS confirmed the
molecular formula
of compound 7b as C23H23N3O. The 1H NMR spectrum revealed the NH protons as three
singlets at δH = 8.36 (for NH-2), 7.97 (for NH-1),
and 6.60 ppm for (NH-3). The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 7b revealed the carbonyl carbon at δC = 155.8,
whereas the carbon signal of C-Ph was observed at δC = 149.1 ppm (see the Experimental Section). The four carbon signals of the CH2–CH2 appeared at δC = 36.4, 36.1, 35.7, and 32.2 ppm.
Reaction of Compound 7a with
Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate (8a) and Substituted
Isothiocyanates 10a–10e
In extension to the aforesaid strategy and taking compound 7a, as an example, in the reaction between 7a and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (8a), the reaction
gave compound 9 in 80% yield (Scheme ). HRMS confirmed the molecular formula of 9 as C23H25N3O5 indicating the addition reaction of compound 7a to 8a proceeded without elimination of a MeOH molecule.
Scheme 2
Strategy
of Various Reactions of N-(4′-[2.2]Paracyclophanyl)hydrazinecarboxamide
(7a)
Reagents and conditions: (H)
EtOH, reflux 4 h; (I) oil path EtOH, 70 °C, reflux 4–8
h.
Strategy
of Various Reactions of N-(4′-[2.2]Paracyclophanyl)hydrazinecarboxamide
(7a)
Reagents and conditions: (H)
EtOH, reflux 4 h; (I) oil path EtOH, 70 °C, reflux 4–8
h.To discriminate between the possible structures 9 and 9′, we analyzed the NMR spectrum.
As, the hydrazano-NH
appeared in the 1H NMR spectrum as a singlet at δH = 11.01, whereas the PC-NH at δH = 8.45.
The two methyl-ester protons appeared as two very close singlets at
δH = 3.90 and 3.75 ppm. The 1H NMR did
not reveal any proton for the ethylenic-H, which excluded the formation
of the isomeric product 9′ (Figure ). The CH2 carbon and its protons
attached to the ester group resonated at the same region of the ethylenic-CH2 of PC. The 13C NMR spectrum revealed the two methyl-esters
at δC = 52.5 and 52.1 ppm (see the Experimental Section). The structure of 9 was
unambiguously proved by X-ray structure analysis as shown in Figure .
Figure 2
Additive products 9 and 9′ from
the reaction between 7a and 8a.
Figure 3
Molecular structure of compound 9 (displacement parameters
are drawn at the 50% probability level).
Additive products 9 and 9′ from
the reaction between 7a and 8a.Molecular structure of compound 9 (displacement parameters
are drawn at the 50% probability level).X-ray structure analysis of compound 9 showed different
bond lengths of the C–N bonds, as the bond lengths of C16–N17
and C18–N19 are 1.413 and 1.384 Å, respectively. The lengths
of the double bonds assigned to the C=O and N=C as in
C18–O18 and N20–C21 are 1.225 and 1.272 Å, respectively.
Whereas the lengths of the C–C bond assigned to the C21–C22
and C22–C23 are 1.496 and 1.510 Å, respectively.Surprisingly, when compound 7a was subjected to substituted
isothiocyanates 10a–10e, the unexpected
substituted thiourea derivatives 11a–11e were obtained in 50–60% yields as the major products, whereas
the expected products results in the addition reaction of 7a to 10a–10e were obtained in 20–30%
yields (Scheme ).
Both products were separated by column chromatography using ethyl
acetate–hexane, 10:1. The IR spectrum of compound 11d, as an example, revealed absorptions at ṽ = 3296–3206 (NH, s), 3091 (aryl-H), 2925 (aliph.-CH), and
1456 cm–1 (C=S). Additionally, the 1H NMR spectrum revealed two singlets at δH = 8.99
(NH-1) and 7.50 ppm (NH-3). The ethyl protons were detected in the 1H NMR spectrum as a quartet at δH = 3.61
(for CH2, J = 7.2 Hz) and as a double-triplet
at δH = 1.08 ppm (for CH3, J = 13.2, 7.1 Hz). The 13C NMR spectrum presented the C=S
and the ethyl carbon signals at δC = 180.2, 56.5
(CH2-ethyl) and 14.9 ppm (CH3-ethyl), respectively.
HRMS confirmed the molecular formula of 11d as C19H22N2S. Finally, X-ray structure analysis
confirmed the structure of compound 11d as shown in Figure .
Figure 4
Molecular structure of
one of the crystallographic independent
molecules of compound 11d (displacement parameters are
drawn at the 50% probability level).
Molecular structure of
one of the crystallographic independent
molecules of compound 11d (displacement parameters are
drawn at the 50% probability level).The structures of compounds 12a–12e were identified as thiamido derivatives of 11a–11e (Scheme ). As for example, compound 12d was proved as N-(4′-[2.2]paracyclophanyl)-2-(ethylcarbamothioyl)hydrazine-1-carboxamide.
In the 1H NMR spectrum, compound 12d supported
the structure, since four singlets for NH protons appeared at δH = 9.29 (NH-3), 8.37 (NH-2), 8.29 (NH-4), and 7.59 ppm (NH-1).
The ethyl protons resonated in the 1H NMR spectrum as a
quartet at δ = 3.61 (CH2, J = 7.2 Hz) and as a triplet for CH3 at δH = 1.12 ppm (J = 7.1 Hz).
The 13C NMR spectrum confirmed the structure of 12d by the appearance of the C=S carbon signal at δC = 182.6, in addition to a signal at δC =
155.0 ppm for the carbonyl carbon signal. The ethyl carbon signals
were distinguished at δC = 39.0 (CH2-ethyl)
and at δC = 14.9 ppm (CH3-ethyl). Mass
spectrometry showed the molecular ion peak at m/z (%) = 368 (20). Besides that, HRMS proved the molecular
formula of 12d to be C20H24N3OS.The mechanism describes the formation of compounds 11a–11e and 12a–12e could be explained as due to the addition of the NH lone
pair to
the electrophilic center in 10a–10d in the C=S to form compound 11 (Scheme ). Rearrangement of 11 involved addition of the NH-PC via the bond between
NH-PC and C=O to the electrophilic carbon of C=S accompanied
by the oxidation process to give the intermediate 12 (Scheme ). Upon heating,
N2 and CO would then be eliminated, as shown in Scheme , to produce 11 (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Mechanism Describing the Formation of Compounds 11a–11e and 12a–12e
Reaction
of Compounds 11a–11e and 12a–12e with Diethyl
Acetylenedicarboxylate (8b) and Preparation of 1,3,4-Oxazole
Derivative 17
Further investigation was done
toward compounds 11a–11e and 12a–12e through their reactions with diethyl
acetylenedicarboxylate (8b). The corresponding oxothiazoles 14a–14e and 15a–15e were obtained and were identified by IR and NMR spectra
in addition to HRMS. For example, the structure of compound 14b was elucidated by 1H NMR spectrum via the appearance of the aromatic protons as two multiplets at δH = 7.58–7.27 (for 5H) and at δH =
6.66–6.22 ppm (6H), whereas the vinyl-proton of the exocyclic
double bond resonated as a singlet δH = 6.78 ppm.
A quartet at δH = 5.22 (J = 8.2
Hz, for CH2) and as a triplet (3H) at δH = 1.20 (J = 6.9 Hz, CH3) appeared to
indicate the ethyl ester protons. The benzyl protons are clearly resonated
as a double-doublet at δH = 4.17 ppm (J = 14.3, 6.8 Hz). The 13C NMR spectrum supported the structure
of compound of 14bvia the appearance
of the carbonyl carbon signals at δC = 150.3 and
at 147.5 ppm. The ester carbons and the benzyl carbon signals appeared
at δC = 61.4 (ester-CH2), 13.90 (ester-CH3), and 45.9 ppm (CH2-benzyl).The structure
of compound 14b was totally confirmed by X-ray analysis
as shown in Figure . X-ray structure analysis also proved the structure of the other
thiazole named (rac)-ethyl-(E)-2-((E)-2-(4′-[2.2]paracyclophanylimino)-3-cyclopropyl-4-oxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)acetate
(Figure ).
Figure 5
Molecular structure
of compound 14b (minor disordered
parts omitted for clarity, displacement parameters are drawn at 50%
probability level).
Figure 6
Molecular structure of
compound 14e (displacement
parameters are drawn at 50% probability level).
Molecular structure
of compound 14b (minor disordered
parts omitted for clarity, displacement parameters are drawn at 50%
probability level).Molecular structure of
compound 14e (displacement
parameters are drawn at 50% probability level).On the other side, compound 15c was obtained in 75%
yield and it was identified as (rac)-ethyl-(E)-2-((E)-2-(2-(4′-[2.2]paracyclophanylcarbamoyl)-hydrazineylidene)-3-allyl-4-oxothiazolidin-5-ylidene)acetate.
The 1H NMR spectrum indicated the NH protons as two singlets
at δH = 9.25 (NH-2) and 8.53 ppm (NH-1). The vinyl
proton resonated as a singlet at δH = 6.80. The allyl
protons appeared at δH = 6.08 as ddd (CH-allyl, J = 22.4, 10.3, 5.2 Hz), at δH = 5.12–4.93
as a multiplet for CH2-allyl, and at δH = 4.29 ppm as a doublet (J = 5.3 Hz). Finally the
ethyl protons appeared, as expected, as a quartet at δH = 4.18 (CH2, J = 7.1 Hz), and triplet
at δH = 1.14 ppm (CH3, J = 7.1 Hz). Three distinguished carbonyl carbon signals in the 13C NMR spectrum were present at δC = 165.3
(CO), 165.1 (CO), and 162.9 ppm. Besides that, the allyl carbons are
shown at δC = 132.8 (=CH), 117.6 (=CH2), and at 44.5 ppm (CH2−).In the way to
synthesize 1,3,4-oxazole derivative 16, one example,
such as 12e, was chosen (Scheme ). The disappearance of the
carbonyl and C=S carbons in the IR and 13C NMR indicated
that cyclization occurred (Scheme ). The 1H NMR spectrum of 16 showed the two NH protons as two singlets at δH = 9.41 and 8.44 ppm (see the Experimental Section). The allyl protons appeared as a doublet at δH = 6.76 (J = 1.4 Hz), besides two multiplets at
δH = 5.98–5.90 and at δH =
5.35 and 5.25. According to the 13C NMR spectrum of compound 16, three carbons were distinguished for the allyl carbons
at δC = 46.3 (CH2), 115.8 (=CH2), and 132.3 ppm (=CH−), respectively.
Scheme 4
Synthesis
of Thiazoles 14a–14e and 15a–15e in Addition to 1,3,4-Oxadiazole
Derivative 16
Reagents and conditions: (K)
EtOH, reflux; (L) NaOH (2 N), EtOH, reflux 3 h.
Synthesis
of Thiazoles 14a–14e and 15a–15e in Addition to 1,3,4-Oxadiazole
Derivative 16
Reagents and conditions: (K)
EtOH, reflux; (L) NaOH (2 N), EtOH, reflux 3 h.
Experimental Section
Uncorrected melting
points were taken in a Gallenkamp melting point
apparatus (Weiss-Gallenkamp, Loughborough, U.K.). The infrared spectra
were determined with a Bruker Alpha ATR instrument. The NMR spectra
of the title compounds described herein were recorded on a Bruker
Avance 400 NMR instrument at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 101
MHz for 13C NMR; the references used were the 1H and 13C peaks of the solvents, d6-dimethyl sulfoxide ((CD3)2SO-d6): 2.50 ppm for 1H NMR and 39.4
ppm for 13C NMR. For the characterization of centrosymmetric
signals, the signal’s median point was chosen; for multiplets,
the signal range was given. The following abbreviations were used
to describe the proton splitting pattern: d = doublet, t = triplet,
m = multiplet, dd = doublet of a doublet. The following abbreviations
were used to distinguish between signals: HAr = aromatic-CH, HPc = [2.2]paracyclophane-CH2. Signals of the 13C NMR spectra were assigned
with the help of DEPT90 and DEPT135 and were specified in the following
way: + = primary or tertiary carbon atoms (positive DEPT signal),
– = secondary carbon atoms (negative DEPT signal), Cq = quaternary carbon atoms (no DEPT signal). Mass spectra observed
by fast atom bombardment (FAB) experiments were recorded using a Finnigan,
MAT 90 (70 eV) instrument. TLC silica plates coated with fluorescence
indicator from Merck (silica gel 60 F254, thickness 0.2 mm) were used
to purify the crude products; flash chromatography with silica gel
60 (0.040 mm × 0.063 mm, Merck) was used.
General
Procedures
Compounds 2–5 were prepared according to the literature.[23]
Synthesis of Compound 6
Isocyanato[2.2]paracyclophane
(5)[23] (1.00 g, 4.1 mmol, 1.00
equiv) was fused with benzylamine
(5 mL) at 100 °C for 10 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled
to room temperature until a precipitate was formed (24 h). The precipitate
of 6 was filtered and washed with 150 mL of hexane (three
times) and then was dried.
Under an argon atmosphere, a mixture of isocyanato[2.2]paracyclophane
(5)[23] (5.00 g, 20.1 mmol,
1.00 equiv) was dissolved in 25 mL of hydrazine monohydrate and heated
under reflux for 20 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room
temperature until a precipitate was formed (24 h). Product 7a was then filtered and washed with 150 mL of hexane (three times)
and then dried.
Under an argon atmosphere, a
mixture of isocyanato[2.2]paracyclophane
(5)[23] (0.249 g, 1.00 equiv)
was added to phenylhydrazine (0.108 g, 1.00 equiv) in 100 mL of toluene
and was refluxed for 20 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to
room temperature until a precipitate was formed (24 h). Product 7b was then filtered and washed with 50 mL of hexane (three
times) and then dried.
A mixture of [2.2]paracyclophanyl hydrazinecarboxamide (7a, 0.281 g, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and dimethyl acytelenedicarboxylate
(8a, 0.142 g, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in absolute ethanol
(40 mL) was refluxed for 4 h (the reaction was monitored by thin-layer
chromatography). After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure,
the crude product was purified by column chromatography using cyclohexane/EtOAc
10:1 to afford racemic-9.
A mixture of [2.2]paracyclophanehydrazinecarboxamide (7a, 1.00 equiv) and the substituted isothiocyanates (10, 1.00 equiv) in 60 mL of ethanol was refluxed 80 °C for 4–8
h (the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography). After
removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the crude residue was
purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate/hexane 5:1 to
give compounds 11a–11e and 12a–12e.
A mixture
of N-substituted [2.2]paracyclophanylthioureas
(11a–11e, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv)
and 8b (0.170 g, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in absolute ethanol
(40 mL) was refluxed for 3–4 h (the reaction was monitored
by thin-layer chromatography). After removal of the solvent under
reduced pressure, the crude product was purified by column chromatography
using EtOAc/hexane, 5:1 to give compounds 14a–14e.
A mixture of N-substituted [2.2]paracyclophanylhydrazinecarbothioamides
(12a–12e, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv)
and diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DEAD) (8b, 0.170
g, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in absolute ethanol (40 mL) was refluxed
for 3–6 h (the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography).
After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the crude product
was purified by column chromatography using EtOAc/hexane, 5:1 to afford 15a–15e.
A stirring mixture
of N-allyl [2.2]paracyclophanylhydrazinecarbothioamides
(12e, 0.380 g, 1.00 mmol, 1.00 equiv) and 10 mL of sodium
hydroxide (1.00 mmol, as a 2 N solution) dissolved in 40 mL of ethanol
was refluxed for 3 h. After cooling, the solution was acidified with
10 mL of hydrochloric acid (6 M) and the formed precipitate was filtered.
The single-crystal X-ray diffraction study were carried out on
a
Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer with a PhotonII detector at 123(2)
K or 173(2) K using Cu–Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178
Å). Dual space/intrinsic methods[25] were used for structure solution, and refinement was carried out
using SHELXL-2014 (full-matrix least-squares on F2).[26] Hydrogen atoms were localized
by difference electron density determination and refined using a riding
model (H(N) free). Semiempirical absorption corrections were applied.
For 14b, an extinction correction was applied. In 14b, the ethyl moiety is disordered (see the cif files for details). 14e was refined as a
twin with two domains.9: Yellow crystals, C23H25N3O5, Mr = 423.46, crystal size 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.04
mm3, monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a = 13.3388(5) Å, b = 8.1948(3) Å, c = 19.9695(8) Å,
β = 106.989(2)°, V = 2087.58(14) Å3, Z = 4, ρ = 1.347 Mg/m–3, μ(Cu–Kα) = 0.79 mm–1, F(000) = 896, T = 123 K, 2θmax = 144.6°, 32299 reflections, of which 4117 were independent
(Rint = 0.035), 288 parameters, 2 restraints, R1 = 0.071 (for 3572I > 2σ(I)), wR2 = 0.213 (all data), S = 1.05, largest diff. peak/hole = 1.00/–0.20 e
Å–3.11d: Colorless crystals,
C19H22N2S, Mr = 310.44, crystal
size 0.16 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm3, triclinic, space
group P-1 (no. 2), a = 11.3925(3)
Å, b = 12.0321(3) Å, c = 13.4654(4) Å, α = 88.526(1)°, β = 65.296(1)°,
γ = 76.086(1)°, V = 1621.79(8) Å3, Z = 4, ρ = 1.271 Mg/m–3, μ(Cu–Kα) = 1.74 mm–1, F(000) = 664, T = 123 K, 2θmax = 144.8°, 30263 reflections, of which 6380 were independent
(Rint = 0.029), 409 parameters, 4 restraints, R1 = 0.038 (for 5802I > 2σ(I)), wR2 =
0.107 (all data), S = 1.05, largest diff. peak/hole
= 0.41/–0.27 e Å–3.14b: Yellow crystals, C30H28N2O3S, Mr = 496.60,
crystal size 0.16 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm3, monoclinic,
space group P21/c (no.
14), a = 10.0473(4) Å, b =
34.0461(14) Å, c = 7.5093(3) Å, β
= 100.286(2)°, V = 2527.43(18) Å3, Z = 4, ρ = 1.305 Mg/m–3, μ(Cu–Kα) = 1.42 mm–1, F(000) = 1048, T = 173 K, 2θmax = 144.6°, 18990 reflections, of which 4720 were independent
(Rint = 0.053), 325 parameters, 2 restraints, R1 = 0.045 (for 4229I > 2σ(I)), wR2 = 0.122 (all data), S = 1.04, largest diff. peak/hole = 0.51/–0.51 e
Å–3.14e: Yellow crystals,
C26H26N2O3S, Mr = 446.55,
crystal size 0.21 × 0.15 × 0.03 mm3, monoclinic,
space group P21/c (no.
14), a = 24.6864(10) Å, b =
7.8388(3) Å, c = 11.4055(5) Å, β
= 91.995(1)°, V = 2205.76(16) Å3, Z = 4, ρ = 1.345 Mg/m–3, μ(Cu–Kα) = 1.56 mm–1, F(000) = 944, T = 173 K, 2θmax = 144.6°, 16496 reflections, of which 4306 were independent
(Rint = 0.043), 290 parameters, R1 = 0.096 (for 3868I > 2σ(I)), wR2 = 0.278 (all data), S = 1.04, largest diff. peak/hole = 1.48/–0.52 e
Å–3.CCDC-2128196 (9), CCDC-2128197
(11d),
CCDC-2128199 (14b), and CCDC-2128199 (14e) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif
Conclusion
In the current study, a novel series assembly of thio(ureas), semicarbazides,
thiosemicarbazides, thiazoles, and oxadiazole derived from [2.2]paracyclophane
were effectively synthesized. Therefore, it would be potentially applied
to the symmetrical disubstituted PC. We are encouraging to synthesize
numerous new heterocycles derived from [2.2]paracyclophanes aiming
to increase attention on that important asymmetric molecule toward
biological activity. Previous reports have dealt with effective biological
activities resulting from conjugation between paracyclophane and heterocycle
molecules. That might led to the discovery of promising novel hybrids
of interesting heterocyclic/paracyclophanes as a starting point in
medicinal chemistry art that warrants further research and development
as potential biological active candidates.
Authors: Alice M R Bernardino; Adriana O Gomes; Karen S Charret; Antônio C C Freitas; Gérzia M C Machado; Marilene M Canto-Cavalheiro; Leonor L Leon; Veronica F Amaral Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Mostafa M Ghorab; Mansour S Alsaid; Mohamed S A El-Gaby; Mahmoud M Elaasser; Yassin M Nissan Journal: Chem Cent J Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 4.215
Authors: Ashraf A Aly; Stefan Bräse; Alaa A Hassan; Nasr K Mohamed; Lamiaa E Abd El-Haleem; Martin Nieger Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Jolanta Dyniewicz; Piotr F J Lipiński; Piotr Kosson; Marta Bochyńska-Czyż; Joanna Matalińska; Aleksandra Misicka Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Antigoni Kotali; Despina A Nasiopoulou; Constantinos A Tsoleridis; Philip A Harris; Christos A Kontogiorgis; Dimitra J Hadjipavlou-Litina Journal: Molecules Date: 2016-01-23 Impact factor: 4.411