Wan Ying Gan1, Serene En Hui Tung2, Ruckwongpatr Kamolthip3, Simin Ghavifekr4, Paratthakonkun Chirawat5, Ira Nurmala6, Yen-Ling Chang7, Janet D Latner8, Ru-Yi Huang9,10, Chung-Ying Lin11,12,13,14. 1. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. 2. Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. 3. Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Rd, Tainan, 701401, Taiwan. 4. Faculty of Education, University of Malaya (UM), 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 5. College of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Sala Ya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. 6. Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia. 7. Department of Family Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan. 8. Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA. 9. Department of Family and Community Medicine, E-DA Hospital, No. 1, Yida Rd., Yanchao Dist., Kaohsiung, 82445, Taiwan. ruyi.star@gmail.com. 10. School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. ruyi.star@gmail.com. 11. Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Rd, Tainan, 701401, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com. 12. Biostatistics Consulting Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com. 13. Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com. 14. Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and Perceived Weight Stigma Scale (PWS) among Malaysian university students. METHODS: University students who were studying in a Malaysia university with a mean age of 24.0 years (n = 380; females 71.6%) were recruited through convenience sampling between 19 August and 30 September 2021. They completed a Google Form consisting of information on sociodemographic background, weight stigma, psychological distress and self-reported body weight and height. Psychometric testing was conducted using the classical test theory (including confirmatory factor analysis) and Rasch models to confirm the two-factor structure of WSSQ and the unidimensional structure of the PWS using the various fit indices. Concurrent validity of the total scores of WSSQ and PWS with psychological distress and body mass index (BMI) was also investigated. Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha was conducted. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses verified the two-factor structure for the WSSQ and the single-factor structure for the PWS. Both the WSSQ and PWS showed good internal consistency and good concurrent validity as demonstrated by their significant correlations with psychological distress and BMI. CONCLUSION: The WSSQ and PWS have strong validity and reliability, and they can both be used to assess weight stigma among Malaysian university students. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V: Descriptive study.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and Perceived Weight Stigma Scale (PWS) among Malaysian university students. METHODS: University students who were studying in a Malaysia university with a mean age of 24.0 years (n = 380; females 71.6%) were recruited through convenience sampling between 19 August and 30 September 2021. They completed a Google Form consisting of information on sociodemographic background, weight stigma, psychological distress and self-reported body weight and height. Psychometric testing was conducted using the classical test theory (including confirmatory factor analysis) and Rasch models to confirm the two-factor structure of WSSQ and the unidimensional structure of the PWS using the various fit indices. Concurrent validity of the total scores of WSSQ and PWS with psychological distress and body mass index (BMI) was also investigated. Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha was conducted. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses verified the two-factor structure for the WSSQ and the single-factor structure for the PWS. Both the WSSQ and PWS showed good internal consistency and good concurrent validity as demonstrated by their significant correlations with psychological distress and BMI. CONCLUSION: The WSSQ and PWS have strong validity and reliability, and they can both be used to assess weight stigma among Malaysian university students. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V: Descriptive study.
Authors: Zainab Alimoradi; Farzaneh Golboni; Mark D Griffiths; Anders Broström; Chung-Ying Lin; Amir H Pakpour Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Ping Xu; Jung-Sheng Chen; Yen-Ling Chang; Xiaodong Wang; Xingyong Jiang; Mark D Griffiths; Amir H Pakpour; Chung-Ying Lin Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: Mohsen Saffari; Jung-Sheng Chen; Hung-Ching Wu; Xavier C C Fung; Chih-Cheng Chang; Yen-Ling Chang; Ruckwongpatr Kamolthip; Marc N Potenza; I-Ching Lin; Chung-Ying Lin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 3.390