| Literature DB >> 35473930 |
Satomi Mizuno1, Sachiko Ono2, Ayumi Takano3, Hideo Yasunaga4, Hirotaro Iwase5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the oral conditions in nonelderly methamphetamine users, such as the presence of dental caries and periodontitis. We aimed the oral conditions between methamphetamine users and non-users stratified by age groups.Entities:
Keywords: Caries; Computed tomography; Oral hygiene; Periodontal disease(s)/periodontitis; Public health; Risk factor(s)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35473930 PMCID: PMC9044830 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02182-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Fig. 1Flowchart of decedent selection and matching process. Abbreviation MA methamphetamine/amphetamine
Demographic characteristics of decedents by each age category after matching
| Young adult | Middle-aged | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA (n = 37) | Control (n = 148) | MA (n = 55) | Control (n = 220) | |||
| Men (%) | 33 (89.2) | 132 (89.2) | 1.00 | 47 (85.5) | 188 (85.5) | 1.00 |
| Age (years, mean [SD]) | 37.1 (5.9) | 37.1 (5.8) | 1.00 | 52.4 (5.3) | 52.4 (5.3) | 1.00 |
| Vocation | 17 (45.9) | 77 (52.0) | 0.633 | 20 (36.4) | 109 (49.5) | 0.109 |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean [SD]) | 24.5 (5.7) | 22.8 (4.7) | 0.07 | 23.1 (4.5) | 22.6 (4.7) | 0.525 |
| HbA1c (%, mean [SD]) | 5.5 (0.5) | 5.5 (1.1) | 0.973 | 6.0 (1.5) | 5.6 (1.1) | 0.067 |
| Concurrent use of drugs (%) | ||||||
| Phencyclidine | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) | 1.00 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Benzodiazepine | 3 (8.1) | 5 (3.4) | 0.416 | 3 (5.5) | 23 (10.5) | 0.381 |
| Cocaine | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Tetrahydrocannabinol | 2 (5.4) | 6 (4.1) | 1.00 | 1 (1.8) | 3 (1.4) | 1.00 |
| Opioid | 0 (0) | 7 (4.7) | 0.3861 | 1 (1.8) | 3 (1.4) | 1.00 |
| Barbiturate | 1 (2.7) | 10 (6.8) | 0.5861 | 1 (1.8) | 9 (4.1) | 0.687 |
| Tricyclic antidepressants | 2 (5.4) | 0 (0) | 0.051 | 0 (0) | 4 (1.8) | 0.706 |
| Non-SCL-criminal record (%) | 17 (45.9) | 26 (17.6) | 29 (52.7) | 30 (13.6) | ||
Bold values indicate that the statistical significance at p < 0.05
BMI body mass index, HbA1c haemoglobin A1c, MA methamphetamine/amphetamine, SD standard deviation, SCL stimulant control law
Unsound tooth condition, periodontal status, and occlusal status in MA and control groups by age
| Young adult | Middle-aged | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA (n = 37) | Control (n = 148) | MA (n = 55) | Control (n = 220) | |||
| DMFT (Mean [SD]) | 14.2 (7.6) | 11.0 (6.1) | 19.3 (7.1) | 16.5 (6.9) | ||
| Decayed teeth | 3.2 (2.9) | 1.2 (2.2) | 2.5 (2.8) | 0.9 (1.6) | ||
| Retained roots | 1.5 (2.1) | 0.7 (1.8) | 2.0 (3.0) | 1.4 (3.0) | 0.169 | |
| Missing teeth | 3.7 (4.7) | 1.8 (3.4) | 9.5 (7.8) | 6.0 (7.3) | ||
| Filled teeth | 2.8 (2.9) | 5.3 (4.0) | 2.6 (3.5) | 4.5 (4.3) | ||
| Teeth filled with RCT | 2.8 (3.7) | 2.1 (3.1) | 0.195 | 2.8 (3.7) | 3.8 (3.9) | 0.107 |
| Periodontitis (%) | 14 (39.0) | 10 (6.8) | 30 (60.0) | 25 (13.4) | ||
| Eichner's classification (%) | ||||||
| A: Full support | 20 (54.1) | 120 (81.1) | 14 (25.5) | 120 (54.5) | ||
| B: 1–3 molar support and 0 molar support with anterior support | 15 (40.5) | 26 (17.6) | 26 (47.3) | 79 (35.9) | 0.163 | |
| C: No support | 2 (5.4) | 2 (1.4) | 0.376 | 15 (27.3) | 21 (9.5) | |
Bold values indicate that the statistical significance at p < 0.05
MA methamphetamine/amphetamine, DMFT the decayed, missing, and filled teeth index, RCT root canal treatment, SD standard deviation
Fig. 2Distribution pattern by each unsound tooth category. Abbreviations MA methamphetamine/amphetamine, RCT root canal treatment. *p < 0.05, ⁑p < 0.001