Literature DB >> 3547387

Participation in fecal occult blood screening: a critical review.

S J Blalock, B M DeVellis, R S Sandler.   

Abstract

The factors that influence participation in fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer are poorly understood. A better understanding of these factors could lead to better screening products or to educational approaches to increase participation with currently available products. In this article, we review findings from studies that have examined the determinants of participation in fecal occult blood screening. Two components of participation are identified: initial agreement to participate and subsequent compliance with the testing procedures. We conclude that the factors that lead to agreement often differ from those that lead to compliance. Following the literature review, we discuss ways in which recent advances in attitude and behavior research might be used to improve future investigations of the determinants of participation in fecal occult blood screening. Specifically, this research suggests that investigators should focus on beliefs and attitudes associated with the perceived consequences of screening participation rather than on other types of beliefs and attitudes; measure beliefs and attitudes at the same level of specificity as behavior; and distinguish between individuals' initial agreement to participate in screening and their actual participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3547387     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90002-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  15 in total

1.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Predictors of high risk sexual behaviour in gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; M Boulton; J McLean; G Hart
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1992

4.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

5.  Patient compliance with colorectal cancer screening in general practice.

Authors:  D Mant; A Fuller; J Northover; P Astrop; A Chivers; A Crockett; S Clements; M Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Experiences of patients with false positive results from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  D Mant; R Fitzpatrick; A Hogg; A Fuller; A Farmer; J Verne; J Northover
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Acceptability of opportunistic screening for occult gastrointestinal blood loss.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; R C Cherry; J W Fielding; L Pike; R Holder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

8.  Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria L Champion; Gregory N Larkin; Terrell W Zollinger; Priscilla M Gerde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.162

9.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-06

10.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.