Literature DB >> 35473862

Analytical approaches for detection of breath VOC biomarkers of cattle diseases -A review.

Shokouh Haddadi1, Jacek A Koziel2, Terry J Engelken3.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of diseases in cattle at early stages is of significance both economically and clinically. Non-invasive diagnostic samples such as breath are preferred since they cause minimum inconvenience or pain to the animals. In this review, different sampling devices, sample preparation techniques, instrumentation, and statistical analysis approaches that have been designed and tested are described and compared in terms of their applicability in the diagnosis of common cattle diseases. The sample preparation techniques used include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), sorbent extraction, and needle trap device (NTD). The collected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and the electronic nose (e-nose) technology. The majority of studies are focused on the diagnosis of ketosis and bovine respiratory disease (BRD). The common diseases and potential biomarkers are summarized and discussed. Due to the differences in the number of subjects and the type of animals used in different studies, the results are not consistent. Acetone, although detected in almost all studies and subjects, has elevated concentrations in cattle suffering from ketosis. The results of currently available studies were not indicative of specific biomarkers for BRD, and further investigation is required. The current studies have shortcomings in regards to defining useful VOC profiles, the impact on animal welfare, and the practical application at the producer level. While the presented approaches are promising, more controlled, standardized clinical studies need to be conducted before breath analysis can be routinely performed on cattle.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal agriculture; Bovine health; Non-invasive analysis; Precision agriculture; Sampling and sample preparation; Volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35473862     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  3 in total

1.  Short-Term Effect of Cigarette Smoke on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta; Enrico Buonamico; Claudia Battisti; Teresa Ranieri; Pierluigi Carratu; Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13

2.  Analysis of volatile organic compounds from deep airway in the lung through intubation sampling.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jin Zhang; Houwen Ding; Yueting Ding; Xue Zou; Min Yang; Qiang Zhou; Zhou Liu; Ling Zheng; Heping Zuo; Dianlong Ge; Qiangling Zhang; Chaoqun Huang; Chengyin Shen; Yannan Chu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.478

3.  Study on the Discrimination of Possible Error Sources That Might Affect the Quality of Volatile Organic Compounds Signature in Dairy Cattle Using an Electronic Nose.

Authors:  Asmaa S Ali; Joana G P Jacinto; Wolf Mϋnchemyer; Andreas Walte; Björn Kuhla; Arcangelo Gentile; Mohamed S Abdu; Mervat M Kamel; Abdelrauf Morsy Ghallab
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.