| Literature DB >> 35473303 |
David Seki1,2, Clemens Schauberger3, Bela Hausmann4,5, Angelika Berger2, Lukas Wisgrill2, David Berry1,4.
Abstract
The initial contact between humans and their colonizing gut microbiota after birth is thought to have expansive and long-lasting consequences for physiology and health. Premature infants are at high risk of suffering from lifelong impairments, due in part to aberrant development of gut microbiota that can contribute to early-life infections and inflammation. Despite their importance to health, the ecological assembly and succession processes governing gut microbiome composition in premature infants remained incompletely understood. Here, we quantified these ecological processes in a spatiotemporally resolved 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data set of 60 extremely premature neonates using an established mathematical framework. We found that gut colonization during the first months of life is predominantly stochastic, whereby interindividual diversification of microbiota is driven by ecological drift. Dispersal limitations are initially small but have increasing influence at later stages of succession. Furthermore, we find similar trends in a cohort of 32 healthy term-born infants. These results suggest that the uniqueness of individual gut microbiota of extremely premature infants is largely due to stochastic assembly. IMPORTANCE Our knowledge concerning the initial gut microbiome assembly in human neonates is limited, and scientific progression in this interdisciplinary field is hindered due to the individuality in composition of gut microbiota. Our study addresses the ecological processes that result in the observed individuality of microbes in the gastrointestinal tract between extremely premature and term-born infants. We find that initial assembly is mainly driven by neutral ecological processes. Interestingly, while this progression is predominantly random, limitations to the dispersal of microbiota between infants become increasingly important with age and are concomitant features of gut microbiome stability. This indicates that while we cannot predict gut microbiota assembly due to its random nature, we can expect the establishment of certain ecological features that are highly relevant for neonatal health.Entities:
Keywords: deterministic; microbiota assembly; premature infants; stochastic
Year: 2022 PMID: 35473303 PMCID: PMC9238403 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00163-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 7.324
FIG 1Succession of gut microbiota in extremely premature infants. (A) Absolute abundances of the core genera in premature infants throughout hospitalization. (B) Observed ASV richness. (C) Calculation of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between adjacent samples of the same individual. (D) Calculation of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between the first sample and all following samples of the same individual. (E) Mantel correlogram of between-infant Bray-Curtis dissimilarities and the increase of difference in age. (F) Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination of all 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries corrected by absolute abundances and 16S rRNA gene copy number. Arrows (red) and text (black) indicate directional contribution of numerical environmental variables that are significantly associated with the observed variation and are positioned with respect to their contribution. Box plots show group median and interquartile range. Smoothed lines result from locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) and indicate trends of development. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
Subject cohort demographics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| No. of individuals | 60 |
| % female | 63 |
| No. of deceased individuals | 7 |
| Birth wt (g) | 746.28 ± 153 |
| Body mass index | 6.96 ± 0.88 |
| % with connatal infection | 50 |
| No. of days of hospitalization | 92.85 ± 35.32 |
| Enteral carbohydrates (mg/kg/min) | 3.29 ± 1.38 |
| Enteral fats (g/kg/day) | 2.69 ± 1.14 |
| Enteral proteins (g/kg/day) | 1.47 ± 0.79 |
| Enteral energy (kcal/kg/day) | 48.47 ± 20.87 |
| % Spontaneous birth | 23 |
| Parenteral carbohydrates (mg/kg/min) | 5.14 ± 1.15 |
| Parenteral fats (g/kg/day) | 1.46 ± 0.11 |
| Parenteral protein (g/kg/day) | 2.59 ± 0.53 |
| Parenteral energy (kcal/kg/day) | 54.64 ± 12.97 |
| % intubated | 42 |
| Total no. of days of antibiotic intervention | 17.08 ± 12 |
| Total dose of antibiotics (mg) | 988.413 ± 1,614.15 |
FIG 2Influence of ecological processes on gut microbiota succession throughout time in extremely premature infants. (A) Distribution of βNTI values for pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients within the same clinical ward. Dashed lines indicate the range of βNTI values under the null hypothesis of no significant effects of selection (<|2|) (B) Contribution of individual turnover processes to observed differences in microbial community composition resulting from pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients sampled during the same calendar week within the same clinical ward. (C) Contribution of dispersal limitation to observed differences in microbial community composition, resulting from pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients who were sampled during the same calendar week between differing clinical wards.
FIG 3Underlying mechanisms of initial gut microbiota assembly in extremely premature infants. (A) Distribution of βNTI values of >2 for pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients within NICU-1 during the first week postdelivery, regressed against differences in days postconception. Regression line (green) with confidence interval (gray) illustrates the association between βNTI values of >2 and increasing differences between postconceptional age. (B) Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination of 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries corrected by absolute abundances and 16S rRNA gene copy number, collected during the first week postdelivery only. Arrows (red) and text (black) indicate directional contribution of numerical environmental variables that are significantly associated with the observed variation and are positioned with respect to their contribution.
FIG 4Influence of ecological processes on gut microbiota in neonatal wards. (A) Schematic illustration of transfer of premature infants between neonatal wards. (B) Contribution of individual turnover processes to observed differences in microbial community composition, resulting from pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients who were sampled during the same calendar week within the same clinical ward. (C) Distribution of βNTI values for pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients within the same clinical ward. Dashed lines indicate the range of βNTI values under the null expectation of no significant effects of selection (less than |2|). (D) Contribution of dispersal limitation to observed differences in microbial community composition, resulting from pairwise comparisons of samples between different patients who were sampled during the same calendar week between differing clinical wards. *, P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
FIG 5Influence of ecological processes on gut microbiota succession throughout time in healthy term-born infants. (A) Contribution of individual turnover processes to observed differences in microbial community composition resulting from pairwise comparisons of samples between different term-born infants who were sampled during the same month postdelivery. (B) Magnification of months 3 to 5.