Literature DB >> 3547301

Intratracheal suctioning in sick preterm infants: prevention of intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion by muscle paralysis.

S Fanconi, G Duc.   

Abstract

In a prospective nonrandomized study, using each baby as his or her own control, we compared intracranial pressure (anterior fontanel pressure as measured with the Digilab pneumotonometer), cerebral perfusion pressure, BP, heart rate, transcutaneous Po2, and transcutaneous Pco2 before, during, and after endotracheal suctioning, with and without muscle paralysis, in 28 critically ill preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. With suctioning, there was a small but significant increase in intracranial pressure in paralyzed patients (from 13.7 [mean] +/- 4.4 mm Hg [SD] to 15.8 +/- 5.2 mm Hg) but a significantly larger (P less than .001) increase when they were not paralyzed (from 12.5 +/- 3.6 to 28.5 +/- 8.3 mm Hg). Suctioning led to a slight increase in BP with (from 45.3 +/- 9.1 to 48.0 +/- 8.7 mm Hg) and without muscle paralysis (from 45.1 +/- 9.4 to 50.0 +/- 11.7 mm Hg); but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The cerebral perfusion pressure in paralyzed infants did not show any significant change before, during, and after suctioning (31.5 +/- 9.1 mm Hg before v 32.0 +/- 8.7 mm Hg during suctioning), but without muscle paralysis cerebral perfusion pressure decreased (P less than .001) from 32.8 +/- 9.7 to 21.3 +/- 13.1 mm Hg. Suctioning induced a slight decrease in mean heart rate and transcutaneous Po2, but pancuronium did not alter these changes. There was no statistical difference in transcutaneous Pco2 before, during, and after suctioning with and without muscle paralysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3547301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Endotracheal suctioning: from principles to practice.

Authors:  Brenda M Morrow; Merle J Futter; Andrew C Argent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Is routine endotracheal suction justified?

Authors:  W Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Principles of drug biodisposition in the neonate. A critical evaluation of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interface (Part II).

Authors:  J B Besunder; M D Reed; J L Blumer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  The effects of closed tracheal suctioning plus volume guarantee on cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  J R Kaiser; C H Gauss; D K Williams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Comparison of atracurium and pancuronium in mechanically ventilated neonates.

Authors:  A Piotrowski
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  What does chest physiotherapy do to sick infants and children?

Authors:  Andrew C Argent; Brenda M Morrow
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Cerebral hemodynamic changes during intensive care of preterm infants.

Authors:  Catherine Limperopoulos; Kimberlee K Gauvreau; Heather O'Leary; Marianne Moore; Haim Bassan; Eric C Eichenwald; Janet S Soul; Steven A Ringer; Donald N Di Salvo; Adré J du Plessis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 7.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.