| Literature DB >> 35472260 |
Federico Begato1, Roberto Penasa1, Giulia Licini1, Cristiano Zonta1.
Abstract
The fundamental implications that chirality has in science and technology require continuous efforts for the development of fast, economic, and reliable quantitative methods for enantiopurity assessment. Among the different analytical approaches, chiroptical techniques in combination with supramolecular methodologies have shown promising results in terms of both costs and time analysis. In this article, a tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amines (TPMA)-based supramolecular cage is able to amplify the circular dichroism (CD) signal of a series of chiral dicarboxylic acids also in the presence of a complex mixture. This feature has been used to quantify tartaric acid in wines and to discriminate different matrixes using principal component analysis (PCA) of the raw CD data.Entities:
Keywords: chirality; host−guest chemistry; molecular recognition; self-assembly; supramolecular cages; supramolecular chemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35472260 PMCID: PMC9150167 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.2c00038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Sens ISSN: 2379-3694 Impact factor: 9.618
Figure 1Circular dichroism spectra for the R@1 series. Solution of molecular cages containing the different diacids have been analyzed using CD spectroscopy. Dichroic signals are observed for all diacid. Among them, -Tar acid is furnishing the stronger signal. CD measurements were performed by diluting the synthesized cage with anhydrous DMSO to obtain a final concentration equal to 1.0 × 10–5 M (0.1 cm cuvette). The counterions are perchlorate for the cage.
Figure 2Diacids lead mainly to the formation of two diastereomeric conformations characterized by the opposite helicity of the TPMA unit (MM or PP) according to DFT calculations. Energy difference among the diastereomeric structures is 0.2 kcal/mol for the -Mal and 0.8 kcal/mol for the -Tar acids. The higher energy difference calculated in the latter case is ascribable to the formation of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which results in a tightening of the cage (representative distances in -Mal@1 O–O 6.05 Å and Zn–Zn 9.67 Å, l-Tar@1 O–O 5.47 Å and Zn–Zn 9.11 Å).
-Tar Acid Content in Different Wines Obtained with Standard Addition Method and 1H-NMR Peak Integration in the Presence of an Internal Standard
| tartaric
acid content | ||
|---|---|---|
| wine | CD(g/L) | NMR(g/L) |
| Prosecco | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Chianti | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Chardonnay | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Barbera | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Müller-Thurghau | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Valpolicella | 2.2 | 2.0 |
Values have been taken from ref (21).
Figure 3(a) CD spectra of the supramolecular cage 1 formed upon addition of 15 μL of different fruit juices and wines without pretreatment to a DMSO-d6 solution containing 500 μL of the aldehyde zinc complex and 125 μL of ethylenediamine and (b) PCA analysis. 1H NMR of all the formed cages present in the PCA and relative -Tar and -Mal values are reported in Section S10.