Literature DB >> 35472083

Demographic differences in willingness to share electronic health records in the All of Us Research Program.

Christine L M Joseph1, Amy Tang1, David W Chesla2, Mara M Epstein3,4, Pamala A Pawloski5, Alan B Stevens6, Stephen C Waring7, Brian K Ahmedani8, Christine C Johnson1, Cathryn D Peltz-Rauchman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Participant willingness to share electronic health record (EHR) information is central to success of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program (AoURP). We describe the demographic characteristics of participants who decline access to their EHR data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included participants enrolling in AoURP between June 6, 2017 and December 31, 2019 through the Trans-American Consortium for the Health Care Systems Research Network (TACH). TACH is a consortium of health care systems spanning 6 states, and an AoURP research partner.
RESULTS: We analyzed data for 25 852 participants (89.3% of those enrolled). Mean age = 52.0 years (SD 16.8), with 66.5% White, 18.7% Black/African American, 7.7% Hispanic, 32.5% female, and 76% with >a high school diploma. Overall, 2.3% of participants declined to share access to their EHR data (range across TACH sites = 1.3% to 3.5%). Younger age, female sex, and education >high school were significantly associated with decline to share EHR data, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.26 (1.19-1.33), 1.74 (1.42-2.14), and 2.44 (1.86-3.21), respectively. Results were similar when several sensitivity analyses were performed. DISCUSSION: AoURP seeks a dataset reflecting our nation's diversity in all aspects of participation. Those under-represented in biomedical research may be reluctant to share access to their EHR data.
CONCLUSION: In our data, race and ethnicity were not independently related to participant decision to decline access to their EHR information. Results suggest that the value of the AoURP dataset is unlikely to be constrained by the size or the racial/ethnic composition of this subgroup.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; All of Us Research Program; Trans-American Consortium for the Health Care Systems Research Network; diversity; electronic health record

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35472083      PMCID: PMC9196689          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   7.942


  16 in total

1.  Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Nonresponse research--an underdeveloped field in epidemiology.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Public attitudes toward health information exchange: perceived benefits and concerns.

Authors:  Linda Dimitropoulos; Vaishali Patel; Scott A Scheffler; Steve Posnack
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Privacy and data security in E-health: requirements from the user's perspective.

Authors:  Wiktoria Wilkowska; Martina Ziefle
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.

Authors:  Katherine K Kim; Jill G Joseph; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  External validity, generalisability, applicability and directness: a brief primer.

Authors:  Mohammad H Murad; Abdulrahman Katabi; Raed Benkhadra; Victor M Montori
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-02

7.  Rethinking the medical record.

Authors:  Amalio Telenti; Steven R Steinhubl; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.

Authors:  Katherine K Kim; Pamela Sankar; Machelle D Wilson; Sarah C Haynes
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research.

Authors:  Jihoon Kim; Hyeoneui Kim; Elizabeth Bell; Tyler Bath; Paulina Paul; Anh Pham; Xiaoqian Jiang; Kai Zheng; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-08-02

10.  Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Lucia Ruhland; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Dianne Delva; Richard Birtwhistle; Miu Lam; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Consideration of bias in data sources and digital services to advance health equity.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.