Míriam Campistol1,2, Juan Morote3,4, Lucas Regis3,4, Ana Celma3,4, Jacques Planas3,4, Enrique Trilla3,4. 1. Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. mcampistol@vhebron.net. 2. Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. mcampistol@vhebron.net. 3. Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, an appropriate selection of men for mpMRI or prostate biopsy is still challenging, which is why new biomarkers or predictive models are recommended to determine those patients who will benefit from prostate biopsy. Proclarix is a new test that provides the risk of csPCa based on thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), cathepsin D (CTSD), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), as well as age. This systematic review analyzes the current clinical status of Proclarix and future development. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by two independent reviewers. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms 'prostate', 'thrombospondin-1', 'cathepsin-D' and 'Proclarix' were used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) selection criteria were followed. Finally, four articles analyzed the clinical usefulness of Proclarix. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Proclarix has been developed in men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/mL, normal digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume (PV) ≥ 35 cm3. Proclarix is associated with the PCa grade group and is more effective than %fPSA in detecting csPCa. Two studies analyzed the efficacy of Proclarix in men undergoing guided and systematic biopsies, obtaining similar results to PSA density. CONCLUSION: Initial studies have shown the potential benefit of Proclarix in patients with specific characteristics. Future studies are needed to verify the clinical usefulness of Proclarix in men with suspected PCa before and after mpMRI.
INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, an appropriate selection of men for mpMRI or prostate biopsy is still challenging, which is why new biomarkers or predictive models are recommended to determine those patients who will benefit from prostate biopsy. Proclarix is a new test that provides the risk of csPCa based on thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), cathepsin D (CTSD), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), as well as age. This systematic review analyzes the current clinical status of Proclarix and future development. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by two independent reviewers. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms 'prostate', 'thrombospondin-1', 'cathepsin-D' and 'Proclarix' were used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) selection criteria were followed. Finally, four articles analyzed the clinical usefulness of Proclarix. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Proclarix has been developed in men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/mL, normal digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume (PV) ≥ 35 cm3. Proclarix is associated with the PCa grade group and is more effective than %fPSA in detecting csPCa. Two studies analyzed the efficacy of Proclarix in men undergoing guided and systematic biopsies, obtaining similar results to PSA density. CONCLUSION: Initial studies have shown the potential benefit of Proclarix in patients with specific characteristics. Future studies are needed to verify the clinical usefulness of Proclarix in men with suspected PCa before and after mpMRI.
Authors: Jacques B de Kok; Gerald W Verhaegh; Rian W Roelofs; Daphne Hessels; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Tilly W Aalders; Dorine W Swinkels; Jack A Schalken Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Igor Cima; Ralph Schiess; Peter Wild; Martin Kaelin; Peter Schüffler; Vinzenz Lange; Paola Picotti; Reto Ossola; Arnoud Templeton; Olga Schubert; Thomas Fuchs; Thomas Leippold; Stephen Wyler; Jens Zehetner; Wolfram Jochum; Joachim Buhmann; Thomas Cerny; Holger Moch; Silke Gillessen; Ruedi Aebersold; Wilhelm Krek Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas Steuber; Isabel Heidegger; Mona Kafka; Martin A Roeder; Felix Chun; Felix Preisser; Rein-Jüri Palisaar; Julian Hanske; Lars Budaeus; Ralph Schiess; Thomas Keller; Axel Semjonow; Peter Hammerer; Lukas Manka; Thorsten Ecke; Christian Schwentner; Carsten Ohlmann Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Edward Johnston; Hayley Pye; Elisenda Bonet-Carne; Eleftheria Panagiotaki; Dominic Patel; Myria Galazi; Susan Heavey; Lina Carmona; Alexander Freeman; Giorgia Trevisan; Clare Allen; Alexander Kirkham; Keith Burling; Nicola Stevens; David Hawkes; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Hashim U Ahmed; David Atkinson; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Tony Ng; Daniel Alexander; Hayley Whitaker; Shonit Punwani Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Carlijn R Hooijmans; Maroeska M Rovers; Rob B M de Vries; Marlies Leenaars; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Miranda W Langendam Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Kathrin Endt; Jens Goepfert; Aurelius Omlin; Alcibiade Athanasiou; Pierre Tennstedt; Anna Guenther; Maurizio Rainisio; Daniel S Engeler; Thomas Steuber; Silke Gillessen; Thomas Joos; Ralph Schiess Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vinayak G Wagaskar; Stanislaw Sobotka; Parita Ratnani; James Young; Anna Lantz; Sneha Parekh; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Li Li; Sara Lewis; Kenneth Haines; Sanoj Punnen; Peter Wiklund; Ash Tewari Journal: Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Date: 2021-03-04