Literature DB >> 35470602

Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions to First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System.

Soo Jie Chung1,2, Sun-Ju Byeon3, Jeong-Hee Choi1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to first-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs are common; however, there have been few reports of nationwide epidemiologic studies on ADRs to anti-TB drugs in Korea. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of various ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs using a nationwide database of ADRs.
METHODS: We used the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) database (2009-2018). The study subjects were selected using the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases codes for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB and electronic data interchange codes for isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (ETB), and pyrazinamide (PZA). The causality assessment of "possible," "probable," or "certain" by World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center System causality category was selected.
RESULTS: A total of 1,562,024 ADRs were reported in the KIDS-KAERS database from 2009 to 2018, where ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs were 17,843 cases (1.14%). The most common causative drugs were RIF (28.7%), INH (24.0%), ETB (23.4%), and PZA (23.9%) in that order. 48.5% of cases were reported in the older patients (≥ 60 years). According to organ system, gastro-intestinal system disorder was most common (32.0%), followed by skin and appendage (25.9%), liver and biliary system (14.2%). Nausea was the most common ADR (14.6%), followed by hepatic enzyme elevation (14.2%), rash (11.7%), pruritus (9.1%), vomiting (8.9%), and urticaria (4.2%). Most ADRs appeared within 1 month, but ADRs such as neuropathy, paresthesia, hematologic abnormalities, renal function abnormalities and liver enzyme abnormality were also often reported after 2 months.
CONCLUSION: Our data are clinically informative for recognizing and coping with ADRs of anti-TB drugs.
© 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Drug Reactions; Big Data; KIDS KAERS Database (KIDS-KD); Tuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35470602      PMCID: PMC9039191          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the main public health issues worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020, 10 million people became ill with TB and 1.5 million died in 2020.1 Although the treatment of choice for TB is taking anti-TB drugs, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to first-line TB drugs are associated with substantial morbidity. Moreover, these ADRs result in interruption or revision of the anti-TB treatment that could cause treatment failure and mortality in TB patients.2 The prevalence of ADRs to anti-TB drugs, especially first-line, has been reported from 8% to 83.5% in global studies,3 and 2.5% to 50% in Korean cohort studies.45 There have been few reports of large-scale epidemiologic studies on ADRs to anti-TB drugs especially in Korea. The Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) is a spontaneous adverse event (AE) reporting system in Korea. KAERS is a system developed by Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS) to facilitate reporting and management of AE reports. Anyone who experiences potential ADRs can report spontaneously using KAERS to the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety directly or via the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers. The report rate has gradually increased, and since 2016, it has been showing more than 200,000 cases per year.67 KAERS database has been utilized to detect ADR signals and produce evidence for making effective policies on the safe use of drugs.89 In this background, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs including frequencies, common clinical manifestations, time-to-onset and clinical characteristics of ADRs in elderly TB patients using a nationwide KAERS database from 2009 to 2018.

METHODS

Database

This retrospective study used raw data from KAERS database. The KIDS collects, manages, and provides information on ADRs by KAERS database. After screening and removing data errors, the collected data is coded into eight standardized tables; which are 1) basic information, 2) drug information, 3) side effect information, 4) serious cases information, 5) reporter information, 6) causality evaluation information, 7) medical history information, and 8) group information. Then it is provided as raw data on drug side effects (KIDS KAERS database, KIDS-KD). The basic information table contains the basic information of the report, as well as patient gender and age information. The drug information table includes the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code of the administered drug, the start date of administration, and the action taken after the side effect. In the side effect information table, information on AEs such as the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART) code of the side effect and the date of symptom onset is shown. If the AE was a serious AE, detailed information such as death, life threatening, congenital anomaly, hospitalization or extension of hospitalization period was checked in the serious case information table. In the causality evaluation information table, causality information was confirmed by drug and AE combination. In the medical history information table, the patient's medical history information was confirmed by using the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases (KCD) code.

Case selection

The subjects of this study were from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018 as of the completion date of reporting to KIDS. During the study period, only the cases of having KCD code related "Pulmonary TB (A15-16)" or "Extrapulmonary TB (A17-A19)" (except for cases involving R 76.80 related to latent TB) AND having ATC code of first-line anti TB drugs (Isoniazid [INH], Rifampin [RIF], Ethambutol [ETB], Pyrazinamide [PZA]) (J04AB02, J04AC01, J04AK01, J04AK02, J04AM02, J04AM05, J04AM06) were extracted. The causality assessments were done according to the WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Center System, categorized as “certain,” “probable,” “possible,” “unlikely,” and “unclassified.”10 Cases were selected which were “possible,” “probable,” or “certain” in this study. Serious ADRs were defined as “disability,” “deformity,” “threat,” “death,” “hospitalizations,” and “others.” Adverse cases are described in WHO-ART (ver. 092) which uses a hierarchical information classified in the order of System Organ Class, High Level Term, and Preferred Term levels.1112 Hepatic function abnormality included eleven WHO-ART terms such as hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased, jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis. Rash included three WHO-ART terms such as rash, rash maculopapular, and rash erythematous.

Statistical analysis

Firstly, annual frequencies of ADRs by four anti-TB drug groups (INH, RIF, ETB, and PZA) from 2009 to 2018 were investigated. Then, we stratified total ADRs frequencies by age. Additionally, we investigated common clinical manifestation of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs, total frequencies of ADRs and severe hypersensitivity reactions by four anti-TB drug groups (INH, RIF, ETB, and PZA) were analyzed. Finally, time-to-onset of ADR occurrence, and clinical characteristics of ADRs in elderly TB patients (≥ 60 years old) were investigated. The clinical characteristics of ADRs according to the culprit anti-TB medication and their frequencies were analyzed using R, version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Frequency of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs from 2009 to 2018

A total of 1,562,024 ADRs were reported in the KIDS-KAERS database from 2009 to 2018, where ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs were 17,843 cases (1.14%). RIF (5,115, 28.7%) had the most frequent ADRs, followed by INH (4,289, 24.0%), PZA (4,260, 23.9%), and ETB (4,179, 23.4%). The annual frequency of ADRs for each drug and the registry number of new TB patients are shown in Fig. 1.13 While the registry number of new TB patients is decreasing year by year, all four drugs showed a steady increase in the number of ADRs from 2009, the highest in 2015 (INH 977 cases; RIF 1,181; ETB 920; and PZA 976), and a plateau until 2018.
Fig. 1

Frequencies of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs from 2009 to 2018. To estimate the changes in the number of adverse drug reactions reported by year, the total number of patients newly diagnosed with tuberculosis from the Annual Report on the Notified Tuberculosis in Korea was summarized using a figure.

ADR = adverse drug reaction, TB = tuberculosis, INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide.

Frequencies of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs from 2009 to 2018. To estimate the changes in the number of adverse drug reactions reported by year, the total number of patients newly diagnosed with tuberculosis from the Annual Report on the Notified Tuberculosis in Korea was summarized using a figure.

ADR = adverse drug reaction, TB = tuberculosis, INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide.

Demographics of the ADRs to anti-TB drugs

Frequencies of ADRs of first-line anti-TB drugs according to age and sex and the registry number of new TB patients by age are described in Fig. 2.12 There were 8,737 cases in male patients (49.0%), and 8,660 cases (48.5%) were reported in older patients (≥ 60 years). When we compared the causality assessment of ADRs for each drug, the frequency of “certain” is most frequent in RIF than other drugs (162 vs.211) (Supplementary Table 1). The frequency of serious ADRs was 1,210 cases (6.78%), and the most common causative drug of serious ADRs was RIF (401/1210 cases, 33.1%). Even death was reported for each drug: ETB (2), INH (1), RIF (1), and PZA (1) (Supplementary Table 2).
Fig. 2

Frequencies of ADRs of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs according to age and sex. To estimate the difference in the number adverse drug reactions reported by age group, the total number of patients newly diagnosed with tuberculosis in Korea, by age group, during the study period, was summarized in a figure. Data were compiled from the Annual Report on the Notified Tuberculosis in Korea from 2011 to 2018. The data from the years 2009 to 2010 were not obtained due to differences in the counting method of the Annual Report.

ADR = adverse drug reaction.

Frequencies of ADRs of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs according to age and sex. To estimate the difference in the number adverse drug reactions reported by age group, the total number of patients newly diagnosed with tuberculosis in Korea, by age group, during the study period, was summarized in a figure. Data were compiled from the Annual Report on the Notified Tuberculosis in Korea from 2011 to 2018. The data from the years 2009 to 2010 were not obtained due to differences in the counting method of the Annual Report.

ADR = adverse drug reaction.

Common clinical manifestations of the ADRs to anti-TB drugs

When we classified ADRs according to organ system involvement, cases of gastrointestinal (GI) system disorders were the most common (5,713, 32.0%), followed by skin and appendage (4,615, 25.9%), liver and biliary system (2,531, 14.2%), central and peripheral nervous system (1,267, 7.1%), and generalized symptoms (850, 4.8%) (Fig. 3). The 27 most common ADRs are listed in Table 1. Nausea was the most common ADR (2,611, 14.6%), followed by hepatic enzyme abnormality (2,531, 14.2%), rash (2,089, 11.7%), pruritus (1,617, 9.1%), vomiting (1,587, 8.9%), urticaria (740, 4.2%), anorexia (692, 3.9%), dyspepsia (623, 3.5%), dizziness (587, 3.3%), and arthralgia (553, 3.1%). Similar to the classification according to organ system involvement, ADRs in the GI system, liver, and biliary system were common. However, ADRs of other systems such as hyperuricemia (343, most frequently caused by PZA, 261) and eosinophilia (136, most frequently caused by RIF, 45) were also found. When the common symptoms were classified by culprit drug, RIF for leucopenia and thrombocytopenia; ETB for vision abnormalities; PZA for arthralgia and hyperuricemia were common.
Fig. 3

Frequencies of adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs according to organ systems.

INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide, RBC = red blood cell, RES = reticulo-endothelial system.

Table 1

Frequencies of adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs

Adverse drug reactionsINHRIFETBPZATotal
Nausea633 (24.2)743 (28.5)625 (23.9)610 (23.4)2,611
Hepatic enzyme abnormalitya 670 (26.5)649 (25.6)544 (21.5)668 (26.4)2,531
Rashb 484 (23.2)605 (29.0)519 (24.8)481 (23.0)2,089
Pruritis418 (25.9)493 (30.5)358 (22.1)348 (21.5)1,617
Vomiting387 (24.4)469 (30.0)358 (22.6)373 (23.5)1,587
Urticaria165 (22.3)241 (32.6)189 (25.5)145 (19.6)740
Anorexia166 (24.0)191 (27.6)176 (25.4)159 (23.0)692
Dyspepsia164 (26.3)182 (29.2)144 (23.1)133 (21.3)623
Dizziness144 (24.5)168 (28.6)149 (25.4)126 (21.5)587
Arthralgia112 (20.3)117 (21.2)107 (19.3)217 (39.2)553
Diarrhea103 (21.7)180 (37.9)106 (22.3)86 (18.1)475
Headache112 (24.5)126 (27.5)120 (26.2)100 (21.8)458
Fever82 (21.1)137 (35.3)100 (25.8)69 (17.8)388
Hyperuricemia13 (3.8)15 (4.4)54 (15.7)261 (76.1)343
Myalgia47 (21.0)67 (29.9)47 (21.0)63 (28.1)224
Abdominal pain50 (23.5)64 (30.0)52 (24.4)47 (22.1)213
Malaise40 (24.8)50 (31.1)37 (23.0)34 (21.1)161
Eosinophilia34 (25.0)45 (33.1)32 (23.5)25 (18.4)136
Fatigue35 (28.0)37 (29.6)30 (24.0)23 (18.4)125
Leucopenia29 (28.2)43 (41.7)21 (20.4)10 (9.7)103
Dyspnea21 (22.6)35 (37.6)21 (22.6)16 (17.2)93
Thrombocytopenia18 (22.0)37 (45.1)15 (18.3)12 (14.6)82
Vision abnormality11 (14.1)15 (19.2)42 (53.8)10 (12.8)78
Tremor22 (29.3)24 (32.0)16 (21.3)13 (17.3)75
Cachexia20 (28.2)16 (22.5)20 (28.2)15 (21.1)71
Constipation20 (31.7)18 (28.6)14 (22.2)11 (17.5)63
Weight decrease13 (24.1)16 (29.6)15 (27.8)10 (18.5)54

Data are shown as numbers (row %).

INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide.

aHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’; bRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’.

Frequencies of adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs according to organ systems.

INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide, RBC = red blood cell, RES = reticulo-endothelial system. Data are shown as numbers (row %). INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide. aHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’; bRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’. A total of 56 cases of severe hypersensitivity reactions, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), hypotension, and anaphylaxis have been reported, most commonly caused by RIF (25, 44.6%), followed by INH (12, 21.4%), ETB (12, 21.4%), and PZA (7, 12.5%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Frequencies of severe hypersensitivity reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs

Severe hypersensitivity reactionsINHRIFETBPZASum
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis1 (100.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1
Anaphylactic reaction0 (0.0)1 (100.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1
Drug hypersensitivity syndrome4 (21.1)7 (36.8)5 (26.3)3 (15.8)19
Hypotension1 (8.33)10 (83.3)1 (8.3)0 (0.0)12
Stevens-Johnson syndrome6 (26.1)7 (30.4)6 (26.1)4 (17.4)23
Sum12 (21.4)25 (44.6)12 (21.4)7 (12.5)56

INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide.

INH = isoniazid, RIF = rifampicin, ETB = ethambutol, PZA = pyrazinamide.

Time-to-onset of ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs

We analyzed the frequency of each ADR according to the time-to-onset. Most ADRs occurred within 1 month except acne, most of which (76.5%) occurred after 2 months. Most GI and skin manifestations, including nausea, vomiting, and anorexia manifested within 1 month after initiation of the anti-TB medications, while hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, neuropathy, paresthesia and hematologic changes such as leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or eosinophilia also often occurred more than 1 month and even after 2 months initiation of the anti-TB medications (Table 3). When limited to serious ADRs, severe allergic reactions such as urticaria, angioedema, or pruritus mainly occurred within 1 month, while hypersensitivity reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome appeared 1 months after anti-TB treatment (Supplementary Table 3).
Table 3

Adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs according to time-to-onset

Adverse drug reactions< 1 mon1–2 mon> 2 monMissing valuesTotal
Nausea2,108 (80.7)255 (9.8)186 (7.1)62 (2.4)2,611
Rasha 1,520 (72.8)266 (12.7)241 (11.5)62 (3.0)2,089
Hepatic enzyme abnormalityb 1,386 (54.8)654 (25.8)430 (17.0)61 (2.4)2,531
Pruritis1,097 (67.8)253 (15.6)193 (11.9)74 (4.6)1,617
Vomiting1,305 (82.2)151 (9.5)98 (6.2)33 (2.1)1,587
Urticaria525 (70.9)108 (14.6)84 (11.4)23 (3.1)740
Anorexia533 (77.0)101 (14.6)45 (6.5)13 (1.9)692
Dyspepsia436 (70.0)103 (16.5)62 (10.0)22 (3.5)623
Dizziness471 (80.2)52 (8.9)41 (7.0)23 (3.9)587
Arthralgia333 (60.2)114 (20.6)80 (14.5)26 (4.7)553
Diarrhea371 (78.1)35 (7.4)42 (8.8)27 (5.7)475
Headache359 (78.4)45 (9.8)52 (11.4)2 (0.4)458
Fever349 (89.9)25 (6.4)10 (2.6)4 (1.0)388
Hyperuricemia251 (73.2)56 (16.3)30 (8.7)6 (1.8)343
Myalgia175 (78.1)27 (12.1)15 (6.7)7 (3.1)224
Abdominal pain175 (82.2)4 (1.9)25 (11.7)9 (4.2)213
Malaise141 (87.6)9 (5.6)11 (6.8)0 (0)161
Eosinophilia85 (62.5)29 (21.3)15 (11.0)7 (5.2)136
Fatigue93 (74.4)24 (19.2)8 (6.4)0 (0)125
Leukopenia54 (52.4)18 (17.5)22 (21.4)9 (8.7)103
Dyspnea66 (71.0)16 (17.2)9 (9.7)2 (2.2)93
Thrombocytopenia48 (58.5)13 (15.9)18 (22.0)3 (3.7)82
Vision abnormality57 (73.1)11 (14.1)5 (6.4)5 (6.4)78
Tremor49 (65.3)17 (22.7)9 (12.0)0 (0)75
Cachexia51 (71.8)7 (9.9)9 (12.7)4 (5.6)71
Constipation40 (63.5)15 (23.8)8 (12.7)0 (0)63
Weight decrease32 (59.3)14 (25.9)8 (14.8)0 (0)54
Neuropathy25 (58.1)4 (9.3)13 (30.2)1 (2.3)43
Paresthesia20 (50.0)7 (17.5)12 (30.0)1 (2.5)40
Chest pain25 (71.4)6 (17.1)4 (11.4)0 (0)35
Acne5 (14.7)3 (8.8)26 (76.5)0 (0)34
Edema13 (39.4)14 (42.4)6 (18.2)0 (0)33
Facial edema18 (58.1)0 (0)5 (16.1)8 (25.8)31
Insomnia12 (41.4)14 (48.3)1 (3.5)2 (6.9)29
Gout16 (55.2)8 (27.6)1 (3.5)4 (13.8)29
Coughing22 (78.6)4 (14.3)2 (7.1)0 (0)28
Pancytopenia12 (42.9)7 (25.0)5 (17.9)4 (14.3)28
Renal function decrease9 (32.1)11 (39.3)7 (25.0)1 (3.6)28
Angioedema23 (85.2)0 (0)4 (14.8)0 (0)27

Data are shown as numbers (row %).

aRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’; bHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’.

Data are shown as numbers (row %). aRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’; bHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’.

Clinical characteristics of ADRs to anti-TB drugs in older patients

The proportion of each organ system involvement of ADRs in older patients was 36.4%, 24.8%, and 11.4% in the GI, skin, and hepatobiliary systems, respectively, which was 48.0%, 46.2%, 29.1% in patients < 60 years old. The proportion of elderly was higher than that of younger people in vomiting (925, 58.3% vs. 650, 41.0%), anorexia (522, 75,4% vs. 159, 23.0%), malaise (105, 65,2% vs. 56, 34,8%), constipation (47, 74.6% vs. 15, 23.8%), weight loss (38, 70.4% vs. 16, 29.6%), hematologic abnormalities such as eosinophilia (90, 67.6% vs. 44, 32.4%), thrombocytopenia (68, 83.0% vs. 13, 15.9%) and renal function abnormalities (22, 78.6% vs. 6, 21.4%) (Table 4).
Table 4

Adverse drug reactions to first-line anti-TB drugs according to age group

Adverse drug reactionsYounger, < 60 yrOlder, ≥ 60 yrMissing valuesTotal
Nausea1,240 (47.5)1,336 (51.2)35 (1.3)2,611
Hepatic enzyme abnormalitya 1,512 (59.7)971 (38.4)48 (1.9)2,531
Rashb 1,138 (54.5)889 (42.6)62 (3.0)2,089
Pruritis744 (46.0)851 (52.6)22 (1.4)1,617
Vomiting650 (41.0)925 (58.3)12 (0.8)1,587
Urticaria417 (56.4)314 (42.4)9 (1.2)740
Anorexia159 (23.0)522 (75.4)11 (1.6)692
Dyspepsia250 (40.1)368 (59.1)5 (0.8)623
Dizziness292 (49.7)287 (48.9)8 (1.4)587
Arthralgia318 (57.5)230 (41.6)5 (0.9)553
Diarrhea202 (42.5)270 (56.8)3 (0.6)475
Headache290 (63.3)167 (36.5)1 (0.2)458
Fever231 (59.5)150 (38.7)7 (1.8)388
Hyperuricemia224 (65.3)115 (33.5)4 (1.2)343
Myalgia134 (59.8)84 (37.5)6 (2.7)224
Abdominal pain115 (54.0)97 (45.5)1 (0.5)213
Malaise56 (34.8)105 (65.2)0 (0)161
Eosinophilia44 (32.4)90 (67.6)0 (0)136
Fatigue85 (68.0)40 (32.0)0 (0)125
Leucopenia77 (74.8)26 (25.2)0 (0)103
Dyspnea40 (43.0)53 (57.0)0 (0)93
Thrombocytopenia13 (15.9)68 (83.0)1 (1.2)82
Vision abnormality47 (60.3)25 (32.1)6 (7.7)78
Tremor31 (41.3)44 (58.7)0 (0.0)75
Cachexia21 (29.6)40 (56.3)10 (14.0)71
Constipation15 (23.8)47 (74.6)1 (1.6)63
Weight decrease16 (29.6)38 (70.4)0 (30.0)54

Data are shown as numbers (row %).

aHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’; bRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’.

Data are shown as numbers (row %). aHepatic enzyme abnormality includes hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic function abnormal, SGOT increased, SGPT increased ‘jaundice, hepatitis, gamma-GT increased, bilirubinemia, hepatocellular damage, and cholecystitis’; bRash includes ‘rash, rash maculopapular and rash erythematous’.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we analyzed the frequencies and clinical manifestations of ADRs of first-line anti-TB drugs using the KIDS-KAERS database for 10 years (2009–2018). The steady increase in ADRs at the beginning is due to the build-up phase of KAERS in Korea. RIF is the most common culprit anti-TB drug for ADRs, and the GI, skin, and hepatic organs are the most commonly involved organ systems. GI symptoms and mild allergic reactions occurred within 1 month of anti-TB treatment, while hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, hematologic, and severe hypersensitivity reactions could appear 2 months after anti-TB treatment. The incidence of ADRs to anti-TB drugs, particularly first-line anti-TB drugs, has been reported to vary widely. Dhingra et al.14 reported that 8.4% of patients had ADRs in a prospective study in India and Lv et al.15 reported that the incidence of ADRs was 15.1% in a prospective study in China. An Iranian prospective study showed an incidence of 53.5%, which was higher than that in the previous two studies.16 The prevalence of TB ADRs in Western countries has also been reported to varying degrees. Yee et al.17 reported that the incidence of serious ADRs was 10.7% in a Canadian prospective study, but the overall incidence of ADRs was 83.5% in a Brazilian prospective study.18 The variability in prevalence is presumed to be due to several differences, such as differences in race; the cognitive difference of ADRs according to the study design, that is, the difference between subjective reporting and findings by the researcher; differences according to whether the subject has an underlying disease; differences between HIV coinfection itself and drug-to-drug interaction with anti-viral drugs, among others.3 One study in Korea reported that the prevalence of ADRs to anti-TB drugs was 52.6%, where medical staff directly tracked ADRs and collected information in a prospective study, while the other study reported a prevalence of 2.5% where ADRs were collected in a retrospective study.45 Studies in which researchers closely identified ADRs are thought to directly detect them better and measure their prevalence higher than studies in which they did not. Although the prevalence could not be determined because the number of TB patients could not be obtained in this study, the frequency of ADRs with anti-TB drugs was 17,843 cases over 10 years, 1.14% of the total ADRs. Given the considerable prevalence and frequency, ADRs of first-line anti-TB drugs are of clinical importance; therefore, clinicians should pay attention to ADRs to anti-TB drugs while managing TB patients. Old age is one of the important factors involved in the development of ADRs of anti-TB drugs in several previous studies.192021 This study also showed more ADRs in patients over 60 years old, even though we could not compare the exact prevalence. The pattern of frequently involved organs in older patients was similar to that in patients < 60 years old. However, in some symptoms of ADRs, including eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, and renal dysfunction, the proportion of these ADRs in the elderly was higher than that in the younger TB patients. These ADRs require more attention, especially in older patients, because these ADRs can be more fatal than other ADRs. In this study, the frequency of each ADR was in the following order: nausea (14.6%), rash (11.5%), hepatic enzyme increase (10.78%), pruritus (9.06%), vomiting (8.89%), etc. While the liver and biliary system abnormalities accounted for a higher proportion in previous studies in many countries, including China, Iran, Canada, and Germany (26.1–45.3%), the frequency was relatively low in this study (10.78%).4141517 Meanwhile, in one Korean study, like this study, the frequency of GI symptoms (19.3%) and cutaneous symptoms (17.7%) was higher than the frequency of hepatic function abnormality (13.8%).4 It might be due to biological and ethnic differences, along with socio-cultural differences. This study also identified the time-to-onset of ADRs. Skin and GI symptoms occurred within a relatively short time within 1 months, but hepatotoxicity, hematological abnormalities, and nephrotoxicity were reported even after 2 months. This time-to-onset was similar to that reported in previous studies.1516 Therefore, it is important to recognize that some ADRs may occur even after 2–3 months of administration of anti-TB drugs. In addition, although rare, allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and SCARs were also identified in this study. Looking at the time-to-onset, urticaria, itchiness, angioedema, and anaphylaxis appeared within 1 month, while SCAR appeared after 2 months. It is plausible that the former is an acute type I reaction, and the latter is a delayed type IV reaction. Recently, SCAR caused by anti-TB drugs has been reported in the SCAR registry in Korea. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) was the most common among Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and DRESS. RIF was the most common causative drug of SCAR, which may be in line with the high frequency of cutaneous ADRs caused by RIF in our study.2223 There are several limitations to the present study. First, as the KIDS-KAERS database was a voluntary ADR reporting system, and most cases were reported by medical professionals such as doctors, pharmacists, and nurses. However, their participation was not mandatory. In addition, ADRs of interest to medical staffs or related objective data such as blood test abnormality may be reported more easily and frequently, whereas subjective complaints of patients may be less likely to be reported by the patients. Second, it is possible that the report was delayed or that some cases had several missing values. Third, the cases were obtained as spontaneous ADR reports without control, so only frequency of ADRs could be suggested. Fourth, additional information, such as the subject's underlying diseases, co-administered medication, and hospitalization could not be obtained. Nevertheless, the strength of this study is that the ADRs of the first-line anti-TB drugs were examined in various ways in a large and long-term database for the first time in Korea. In conclusion, ADRs of first-line anti-TB drugs were investigated through the KAERS database (2009–2018) for the first time in Korea. RIF (28.7%) was the most common causative agent. Gastro-intestinal system disorder (32.0%), skin and appendage (25.9%), liver and biliary system (14.2%) were frequently reported. Nausea (14.6%), rash (11.7%), hepatic enzyme abnormality (14.2%), and pruritus (9.1%) were common ADRs. GI and cutaneous symptoms manifested within 1 month, but hepatic and renal dysfunction, and hematologic abnormality also occurred after 2 months. The proportion of elderly was higher than that of younger people in vomiting, anorexia, malaise, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, constipation, and weight loss. Key messages: 1) ADRs are relatively common in older patients and are frequently associated with GI, skin, and liver function abnormalities. 2) Nausea was the most common ADR, followed by hepatic enzyme elevation, rash, pruritus, vomiting, and urticaria. 3) Most ADRs appeared within 1 month, however, ADRs such as neuropathy, paresthesia, hematologic abnormalities, renal function abnormalities, liver enzyme abnormality, etc. were also often reported after 2 months. 4) Regular long-term monitoring for ADR during anti-TB medication is necessary, especially among the older TB patients.
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Adverse drug reaction surveillance system in Korea].

Authors:  Nam-Kyong Choi; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2007-07

2.  Risk factors for side-effects of isoniazid, rifampin and pyrazinamide in patients hospitalized for pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  T Schaberg; K Rebhan; H Lode
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  [Adverse effects of the new tuberculosis treatment regimen recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health].

Authors:  Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel; Letícia Molino Guidoni; Juliana Lopes Favero; David Jamil Hadad; Lucilia Pereira Molino; John L Jonhson; Reynaldo Dietze
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Incidence of serious side effects from first-line antituberculosis drugs among patients treated for active tuberculosis.

Authors:  Daphne Yee; Chantal Valiquette; Marthe Pelletier; Isabelle Parisien; Isabelle Rocher; Dick Menzies
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Frequency of adverse reactions to first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy in a Korean cohort.

Authors:  M W Carroll; M Lee; Y Cai; C W Hallahan; P A Shaw; J H Min; L C Goldfeder; V Alekseyev; S Grinkrug; H S Kang; S Hwang; H-M Park; E Kang; S-Y Lee; B Jin; H-E Park; S Min; S K Park; D S Jeon; L E Via; C E Barry
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Factors associated with anti-tuberculosis medication adverse effects: a case-control study in Lima, Peru.

Authors:  Kocfa Chung-Delgado; Alejandro Revilla-Montag; Sonia Guillen-Bravo; Eduardo Velez-Segovia; Andrea Soria-Montoya; Alexandra Nuñez-Garbin; Wilmer Silva-Caso; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adverse reactions to antituberculosis drugs in Iranian tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Aliasghar Farazi; Masoomeh Sofian; Mansoureh Jabbariasl; Sara Keshavarz
Journal:  Tuberc Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-24

8.  Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Anti-tuberculosis Drugs in Korean Patients.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Jin; Dong Yoon Kang; Young Hee Nam; Young Min Ye; Young Il Koh; Gyu Young Hur; Sae Hoon Kim; Min Suk Yang; Sujeong Kim; Yi Yeong Jeong; Min Hye Kim; Jeong Hee Choi; Hye Ryun Kang; Eun Jung Jo; Hye Kyung Park
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 5.764

9.  Adverse reactions due to directly observed treatment strategy therapy in Chinese tuberculosis patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Lv; Shaowen Tang; Yinyin Xia; Xiaomeng Wang; Yanli Yuan; Daiyu Hu; Feiying Liu; Shanshan Wu; Yuan Zhang; Zhirong Yang; Dehua Tu; Yixin Chen; Peiyuan Deng; Yu Ma; Ru Chen; Siyan Zhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of anti-tuberculosis induced adverse reactions in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Kheirollah Gholami; Elahe Kamali; Mahboubeh Hajiabdolbaghi; Gloria Shalviri
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2006
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.