Literature DB >> 35469426

Gelatin-Based Colloidal Versus Monolithic Gels to Regulate Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response.

Zhumei Zhuang1, Shengnan Sun1, Kaiwen Chen1, Yue Zhang1, Xiaoman Han1, Yang Zhang2, Kai Sun1, Fang Cheng3, Lijun Zhang4, Huanan Wang1.   

Abstract

Unlike conventional monolithic hydrogels with covalent cross-linkage that are typically elastic, colloidal gels assembled by reversibly assembled particles as building blocks have shown fascinating viscoelastic properties. They follow a gel-sol transition upon yielding and recover to the initial state upon the release of the shear force (so-called shear-thinning and self-healing behavior); this makes them an ideal candidate as injectable and moldable biomaterials for tissue regeneration. The immune response provoked by the implantation of the colloidal gels with special viscoelastic and structural features is critical for the successful integration of the implants with the host tissues, which, however, remains little explored. Since macrophages are known as the primary immune cells in determining the inflammatory response against the implants, we herein investigated in vitro macrophage polarization and in vivo inflammatory response induced by gelatin-based colloidal gels as compared to monolithic gels. Specifically, self-healing colloidal gels composed of pure gelatin nanoparticles, or methacrylate gelatin (GelMA) nanoparticles to allow secondary covalent cross-linkage were compared with GelMA bulk hydrogels. We demonstrated that hydrogel's elasticity plays a more dominant role rather than the structural feature in determining in vitro macrophage polarization evidenced by the stiffer gels inducing pro-inflammation M2 macrophage phenotype as compared to soft gels. However, subcutaneous implantation revealed a significantly alleviated immune response characterized by less fibrous capsule formation for the colloidal gels as compared to bulk gels of similar matrix elasticity. We speculated this can be related to the improved permeability of the colloidal gels for cell penetration, thereby leading to less fibrosis. In general, this study provided in-depth insight into the biophysical regulator of hydrogel materials on macrophage behavior and related inflammatory response, which can further direct future implant design and predict biomaterial-host interactions for immunotherapy and regenerative medicine. Impact statement Macrophages response to implanted biomaterials is a highly regulated process that influences device functionality and clinical outcome. Nowadays, the viscoelastic properties of colloidal versus monolithic hydrogels on macrophage phenotype in vitro and the host inflammatory response are not known. Our study found that colloidal hydrogels composed of nanoparticles of gelatin and methacrylate gelatin (GelMA) led to more anti-inflammatory polarization especially on soft colloidal gel (5.9 KPa) compared to bulk GelMA hydrogels. It suggested that macrophage response can be mechanically regulated by the viscoelastic signals of the hydrogels, which could be a promising strategy for the future design and application of novel biomaterials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colloidal gel; gelatin; inflammatory response; macrophage polarization; subcutaneous implantation; viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35469426      PMCID: PMC9347396          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.273


  40 in total

1.  Gelation of particles with short-range attraction.

Authors:  Peter J Lu; Emanuela Zaccarelli; Fabio Ciulla; Andrew B Schofield; Francesco Sciortino; David A Weitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells.

Authors:  Sungmin Nam; Joanna Lee; Doug G Brownfield; Ovijit Chaudhuri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  The inflammasome in host response to biomaterials: Bridging inflammation and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Daniela P Vasconcelos; Artur P Águas; Mário A Barbosa; Pablo Pelegrín; Judite N Barbosa
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Kara L Spiller; Rachel R Anfang; Krista J Spiller; Johnathan Ng; Kenneth R Nakazawa; Jeffrey W Daulton; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Gelatin Nanoparticle-Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Double Network Hydrogels with Local Adaptability and Bioactivity for Enhanced Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Zhixiang Mu; Kaiwen Chen; Shuai Yuan; Yihan Li; Yuanding Huang; Chao Wang; Yang Zhang; Wenzhao Liu; Wenping Luo; Panpan Liang; Xiaodong Li; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Fang Cheng; Huanan Wang; Tao Chen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Dynamic assembly of ultrasoft colloidal networks enables cell invasion within restrictive fibrillar polymers.

Authors:  Alison M Douglas; Alexandros A Fragkopoulos; Michelle K Gaines; L Andrew Lyon; Alberto Fernandez-Nieves; Thomas H Barker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Macrophages in bone fracture healing: Their essential role in endochondral ossification.

Authors:  Claudia Schlundt; Thaqif El Khassawna; Alessandro Serra; Anke Dienelt; Sebastian Wendler; Hanna Schell; Nico van Rooijen; Andreas Radbruch; Richard Lucius; Susanne Hartmann; Georg N Duda; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Tailoring Materials for Modulation of Macrophage Fate.

Authors:  Jinhua Li; Xinquan Jiang; Hongjun Li; Michael Gelinsky; Zhen Gu
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 32.086

Review 9.  Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS-) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages.

Authors:  Marco Orecchioni; Yanal Ghosheh; Akula Bala Pramod; Klaus Ley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Activating an adaptive immune response from a hydrogel scaffold imparts regenerative wound healing.

Authors:  Donald R Griffin; Maani M Archang; Chen-Hsiang Kuan; Westbrook M Weaver; Jason S Weinstein; An Chieh Feng; Amber Ruccia; Elias Sideris; Vasileios Ragkousis; Jaekyung Koh; Maksim V Plikus; Dino Di Carlo; Tatiana Segura; Philip O Scumpia
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 47.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.