| Literature DB >> 35468910 |
Po-Ning Hsu1,2, Kai-Cheng Shie1,2, Kuan-Peng Chen3, Jing-Chen Tu4, Cheng-Che Wu1,2, Nien-Ti Tsou5, Yu-Chieh Lo1,2, Nan-Yow Chen6, Yong-Fen Hsieh7, Mia Wu7, Chih Chen1,2, King-Ning Tu8.
Abstract
Three-dimensional integrated circuit (3D IC) technologies have been receiving much attention recently due to the near-ending of Moore's law of minimization in 2D IC. However, the reliability of 3D IC, which is greatly influenced by voids and failure in interconnects during the fabrication processes, typically requires slow testing and relies on human's judgement. Thus, the growing demand for 3D IC has generated considerable attention on the importance of reliability analysis and failure prediction. This research conducts 3D X-ray tomographic images combining with AI deep learning based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) for non-destructive analysis of solder interconnects. By training the AI machine using a reliable database of collected images, the AI can quickly detect and predict the interconnect operational faults of solder joints with an accuracy of up to 89.9% based on non-destructive 3D X-ray tomographic images. The important features which determine the "Good" or "Failure" condition for a reflowed microbump, such as area loss percentage at the middle cross-section, are also revealed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35468910 PMCID: PMC9035975 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08179-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1(A) The overall circuit diagram of a test sample by using SAT. Where the rectangular area marked by yellow dashed lines is ROI. (B) Zoom-in image of one-fourth of ROI containing 100 microbumps. (C) CT image of the cross-section of a microbump.
Figure 2SEM images and CT images in the XY, XZ, and YZ planes of a selected microbump at (A) the initial state, the state of the resistance increased by (B) 10% and (C) 20%.
Figure 3The training/testing procedures and the performance of the CNN model.
Figure 4The distributions of volume and area of the cross-section of all the 400 microbumps at their (A), (B) initial and (C), (D) reflowed states. (E) The distribution of the cross-section area loss percentage. (F) The volume loss of the entire microbump, (G) The area loss, and (H) The area loss percentage at the middle cross-section versus the initial volume of all the 400 microbumps.