| Literature DB >> 35468815 |
Hodaka Yamada1, Satoshi Washino2, Daisuke Suzuki3, Rika Saikawa3, Shiori Tonezawa3, Rie Hagiwara3, Shunsuke Funazaki3, Masashi Yoshida3, Tsuzumi Konishi2, Kimitoshi Saito2, Tomoaki Miyagawa2, Kazuo Hara3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether hypereosinophilia is a clinical biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hypopituitarism in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.Entities:
Keywords: Hypopituitarism; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immune-related adverse events; Renal cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35468815 PMCID: PMC9040214 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01024-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 3.263
Fig. 1Study protocol (A) and flow chart of the cohort (B)
Clinical characteristics of patients
| Age (years) | 65 [62–79] |
| Male sex (%) | 8 (67) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 4.3 |
| Histology (clear cell carcinoma/chromophobe renal cell carcinoma), n (%) | 11 (92)/1 (8) |
| Radical nephrectomy, n (%) | 9 (75) |
| Course of ICI therapy, n (%) | |
| 2 | 1 (8.3) |
| 3 | 4 (33.3) |
| 4 | 7 (58.3) |
| Duration (days) from the initial ICI therapy to the onset of symptoms | 82.5 [67–100] |
| Symptoms at onset, n (%) | |
| Fatigue | 8 (66.7) |
| Loss of appetite | 5 (41.7) |
| Lightheadedness/hypotension | 3 (25) |
| Nausea/vomiting | 3 (25) |
| Weight loss | 2 (16.7) |
| Weakness | 2 (16.7) |
| Joint pain | 1 (8.3) |
| Muscle pain | 1 (8.3) |
| Adrenal crisis | 1 (8.3) |
| GTCAE grade, n (%) | |
| 1 | 1 (8.3) |
| 2 | 5 (41.7) |
| 3 | 5 (41.7) |
| 4 | 1 (8.3) |
| Pituitary enlargement, n (%) | 1 (8.3) |
| Type of hypopituitarism, n (%) | |
| Hypophysitis | 1 (8.3) |
| Isolated ACTH deficiency | 11 (91.7) |
| Other irAEs, n (%) | |
| Thyroiditis (hypothyroidism) | 5 (41.7) |
| Hepatitis | 2 (16.7) |
| Another pituitary hormone deficiency | 1 (8.3) |
| Colitis | 1 (8.3) |
| Pneumonitis | 1 (8.3) |
| Myocarditis | 1 (8.3) |
| Fulminant-type 1 diabetes | 1 (8.3) |
| Positivity for antithyroid Abs, n (%) | 4 (33.3) |
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and skewed variables as medians with interquartile ranges
Abs antibodies, BMI, body mass index, ICIs immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy), CTCAE Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, ACTH adrenocorticotropic hormone
Transition of clinical parameters in patients with ICI-induced hypopituitarism
| Baseline | Last visit | Onset | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC count (/µL) | 6805 ± 1359 | 6698 ± 1253 | 6905 ± 1076 | 0.919 |
| Neutrophil count (/µL) | 4903 ± 1121 | 4295 ± 1291 | 4022 ± 874 | 0.153 |
| Lymphocyte count (/µL) | 1294 ± 474 | 1560 ± 371 | 1738 ± 531 | 0.076 |
| Eosinophil count (/µL) | 99 [74–177] | 389 ± 261 | 588 ± 304 | < 0.001 |
| Sodium level (mmol/L) | 139 ± 2.1 | 139 ± 3.1 | 137.5 [135–138] | 0.056 |
| Potassium level (mmol/L) | 4.58 ± 0.33 | 4.42 ± 0.42 | 4.29 ± 0.28 | 0.148 |
| Glucose level (mg/dL) | 118 ± 27 | 124 ± 35 | 95 [82–106] | 0.059 |
| Blood urea nitrogen level (mg/dL) | 17.2 ± 3.5 | 20.5 ± 3.5 | 18.9 ± 6.9 | 0.265 |
| Creatinine level (mg/dL) | 0.93 [0.86–1.00] | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 1.15 [1.07–1.32] | 0.184 |
| Hyponatremia, n | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.247 |
| Hyperkalemia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Hypoglycemia, n | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.135 |
| Hypereosinophilia, n | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0.015 |
Data were expressed as means ± standard deviation, and skewed variables as medians with interquartile ranges
WBC white blood cell
Fig. 2Distribution of white blood cell count (A), fraction of eosinophil (B), and eosinophil count (C) at baseline (BT), last visit (LV), and onset of symptoms (OT). Eosinophil fraction (%) and eosinophil count were significantly higher at LV and OT than at BT. Data were expressed as scatter plots with a bar (mean ± standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05, after post hoc analysis
Fig. 3The adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (A) and cortisol levels (B) at the onset of symptoms are shown. There were changes in the ACTH and cortisol levels of five patients at baseline (BT), last visit (LV), and onset of symptoms (OT) (C). The cortisol level at LV was significantly lower than that at BT. Data were expressed as scatter plots with bar (mean ± standard error of the mean). *p < 0.05 vs. BT by paired t-test