| Literature DB >> 35468717 |
Hafiz Ullah1, Bakhtiar Gul2, Haroon Khan2, Naveed Akhtar3, Khushnood Ur Rehman3, Umar Zeb4.
Abstract
Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) is an aquatic macrophyte and grows profoundly on the surface of polluted water reservoirs of Pakistan. The plant can be used as a potential alternative for the fish and poultry industry to meet the promptly growing demand for feed. Our study investigates the effect of varying concentrations (ppm) of nutrients like N, P, and their combination, NP on biomass production, carbohydrate, lipid, protein, and mineral (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn & Zn) contents of L. minor. The varying concentrations of N and P substantially affected the above-stated parameters. The highest biomass yield was recorded in the 30 ppm NP tank as 172 g/m2 day in comparison with the control tank. Higher protein, lipid, and carbohydrate contents were recorded for 30 ppm NP, 20 ppm NP, and 10 ppm NP respectively. Minerals like Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn & Zn increased in 20 ppm P and all N concentrations. The combined application of NP was more effective in boosting the protein, carbohydrate, and lipid content whereas less effective in increasing the mineral contents. A rise in the concentration of N and P showed a positive correlation with the nutritional composition of L. minor.Entities:
Keywords: Aquatic; Duckweed; Lemna; Nutrients; Proximate composition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35468717 PMCID: PMC9040223 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03600-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 5.260
Effect of Growth Medium N, P, and NP concentrations on Protein, Lipid, and Carbohydrate Contents of L. minor
| Nutrients (ppm) | Proximate Nutritional Composition (g/100 g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Lipid | Carbohydrate | |
| 10 N | 27.6 ± 0.8 | 4.67 ± 1.0f | 54.6 ± 1.0 |
| 20 N | 28.7 ± 0.9 | 5.67 ± 2.0 | 56.0 ± 1.5 |
| 30 N | 29.0 ± 0.8 | 6.00 ± 1.5 | 55.6 ± 1.5 |
| 10 P | 29.3 ± 0.5 | 6.67 ± 1.5 | 57.0 ± 1.0 |
| 20 P | 30.0 ± 0.7 | 7.00 ± 2.0 | 57.6 ± 0.5 |
| 30 P | 31.0 ± 2.0 | 8.00 ± 0.8 | 58.3 ± 2.0 |
| 10 NP | 31.0 ± 0.8 | 8.00 ± 0.9 | 59.0 ± 1.7 |
| 20 NP | 32.0 ± 1.5 | 9.00 ± 0.5 | 59.3 ± 1.8 |
| 30 NP | 33.0 ± 2.0 | 10.0 ± 1.0 | 60.0 ± 1.0 |
| Control | 27.0 ± 0.5 | 4.67 ± 0.5 | 52.3 ± 1.0 |
| LSD ( | 1.61 | 0.622 | 3.84 |
Means in the table with different superscripts are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) using the LSD test
Elemental composition of Lemna minor after treatment with variable N and P combinations
| Nutrients (ppm) | Mineral Composition (mg/100 g) Dry Weight | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | Mg | Fe | Mn | Zn | |
| 10 N | 35 ± 0.03 | 27 ± 0.03 | 25 ± 0.41 | 3.2 ± 0.05 cd | 0.07 ± 0.05c |
| 20 N | 38 ± 0.02 | 28 ± 0.03 | 33 ± 0.35 | 2.4 ± 0.15d | 0.03 ± 0.01b |
| 30 N | 40 ± 0.25 | 28 ± 0.03 | 36 ± 0.55 | 3.2 ± 0.40 cd | 0.05 ± 0.02a |
| 10 P | 26 ± 0.05 | 29 ± 0.03 | 23 ± 0.49 | 0.7 ± 0.03 cd | 0.04 ± 0.03d |
| 20 P | 26 ± 0.45 | 30 ± 0.03 | 34 ± 0.65a | 3.2 ± 0.25d | 0.06 ± 0.01a |
| 30 P | 30 ± 0.70 | 31 ± 0.03 | 35 ± 0.47 | 0.8 ± 0.20 cd | 0.04 ± 0.01 cd |
| 10 NP | 26 ± 0.09 | 32 ± 0.03 | 34 ± 0.75 | 3.7 ± 0.18a | 0.06 ± 0.05 cd |
| 20 NP | 24 ± 0.08 | 32 ± 0.03 | 35 ± 0.65 | 2.5 ± 0.32c | 0.08 ± 0.02c |
| 30 NP | 24 ± 0.02 | 33 ± 0.03 | 36 ± 0.40 | 2.8 ± 0.01c | 0.06 ± 0.10 cd |
| Control | 32 ± 0.09 | 25 ± 0.03 | 26 ± 0.55 | 0.7 ± 0.41b | 0.04 ± 0.01 cd |
| LSD ( | 0.8 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
Means in the above with different superscripts were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) using the LSD test. The superscripts with different letters show that the means are significantly different from each other