Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson1,2, Ernesto S Nakayasu1, Brigitte I Frohnert3, Lisa M Bramer1, Sarah M Akers4, Jill M Norris2, Kendra Vehik5, Anette-G Ziegler6,7,8, Thomas O Metz1, Stephen S Rich9, Marian J Rewers3. 1. Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352,USA. 2. Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. 3. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA. 4. Computing & Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA. 5. Health Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA. 6. Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 7. Kilinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany. 8. Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V., 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. 9. Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908,USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Biomarkers that can accurately predict risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically predisposed children can facilitate interventions to delay or prevent the disease. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine if a combination of genetic, immunologic, and metabolic features, measured at infancy, can be used to predict the likelihood that a child will develop T1D by age 6 years. METHODS: Newborns with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing were enrolled in the prospective birth cohort of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). TEDDY ascertained children in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. TEDDY children were either from the general population or from families with T1D with an HLA genotype associated with T1D specific to TEDDY eligibility criteria. From the TEDDY cohort there were 702 children will all data sources measured at ages 3, 6, and 9 months, 11.4% of whom progressed to T1D by age 6 years. The main outcome measure was a diagnosis of T1D as diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria. RESULTS: Machine learning-based feature selection yielded classifiers based on disparate demographic, immunologic, genetic, and metabolite features. The accuracy of the model using all available data evaluated by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.84. Reducing to only 3- and 9-month measurements did not reduce the area under the curve significantly. Metabolomics had the largest value when evaluating the accuracy at a low false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: The metabolite features identified as important for progression to T1D by age 6 years point to altered sugar metabolism in infancy. Integrating this information with classic risk factors improves prediction of the progression to T1D in early childhood.
CONTEXT: Biomarkers that can accurately predict risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically predisposed children can facilitate interventions to delay or prevent the disease. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine if a combination of genetic, immunologic, and metabolic features, measured at infancy, can be used to predict the likelihood that a child will develop T1D by age 6 years. METHODS: Newborns with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing were enrolled in the prospective birth cohort of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). TEDDY ascertained children in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. TEDDY children were either from the general population or from families with T1D with an HLA genotype associated with T1D specific to TEDDY eligibility criteria. From the TEDDY cohort there were 702 children will all data sources measured at ages 3, 6, and 9 months, 11.4% of whom progressed to T1D by age 6 years. The main outcome measure was a diagnosis of T1D as diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria. RESULTS: Machine learning-based feature selection yielded classifiers based on disparate demographic, immunologic, genetic, and metabolite features. The accuracy of the model using all available data evaluated by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.84. Reducing to only 3- and 9-month measurements did not reduce the area under the curve significantly. Metabolomics had the largest value when evaluating the accuracy at a low false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: The metabolite features identified as important for progression to T1D by age 6 years point to altered sugar metabolism in infancy. Integrating this information with classic risk factors improves prediction of the progression to T1D in early childhood.
Authors: Ali S Khashan; Louise C Kenny; Cecilia Lundholm; Patricia M Kearney; Tong Gong; Roseanne McNamee; Catarina Almqvist Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Carmella Evans-Molina; Emily K Sims; Linda A DiMeglio; Heba M Ismail; Andrea K Steck; Jerry P Palmer; Jeffrey P Krischer; Susan Geyer; Ping Xu; Jay M Sosenko Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: Brittni N Frederiksen; Miranda Kroehl; Tasha E Fingerlin; Randall Wong; Andrea K Steck; Marian Rewers; Jill M Norris Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Andrea K Steck; Helena Elding Larsson; Xiang Liu; Riitta Veijola; Jorma Toppari; William A Hagopian; Michael J Haller; Simi Ahmed; Beena Akolkar; Åke Lernmark; Marian J Rewers; Jeffrey P Krischer Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 3.409
Authors: Ezio Bonifacio; Andreas Beyerlein; Markus Hippich; Christiane Winkler; Kendra Vehik; Michael N Weedon; Michael Laimighofer; Andrew T Hattersley; Jan Krumsiek; Brigitte I Frohnert; Andrea K Steck; William A Hagopian; Jeffrey P Krischer; Åke Lernmark; Marian J Rewers; Jin-Xiong She; Jorma Toppari; Beena Akolkar; Richard A Oram; Stephen S Rich; Anette-G Ziegler Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Lisa M Bramer; Bryan A Stanfill; Sarah M Reehl; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Thomas O Metz; Brigitte I Frohnert; Jill M Norris; Randi K Johnson; Stephen S Rich; Marian J Rewers Journal: J Diabetes Date: 2020-08-16 Impact factor: 4.006