| Literature DB >> 35466206 |
Islam Mohammad Shehata1, Waniyah Masood2, Nouran Nemr3, Alexandra Anderson4, Kamal Bhusal4, Amber N Edinoff5, Elyse M Cornett6, Adam M Kaye7, Alan D Kaye6.
Abstract
Depression is a leading cause of disability globally, with a prevalence of 3.8% among the whole population, 5% of the adult population, and 5.7% of the elderly population over 60 years of age. There is evidence that depression is linked to certain neurodegenerative diseases, one being Alzheimer's disease (AD). The efficacy of conventional antidepressants to treat depression in AD is conflicting, especially regarding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). A recent systemic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials including fourteen antidepressant medications showed no high efficacy in treating AD patients' symptoms. However, ketamine, a nonselective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, can mediate a wide range of pharmacological effects, including neuroprotection, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, multimodal analgesia, and treatment of depression, suicidal attempts, and status epilepticus. Esketamine, which is ketamine formulated as a nasal spray, was approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2019 as an adjuvant drug to treat treatment-resistant depression. NMDA receptor antagonists treat AD through offsetting AD-related pathological stimulation of subtypes of glutamate receptors in the central nervous system. Recent clinical findings suggest that ketamine may provide neuroprotection and reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with AD. In the present investigation, we evaluate the potential role of ketamine and its postulated mechanism in AD management.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; NDMA antagonists; dementia; depression; esketamine; ketamine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35466206 PMCID: PMC9036213 DOI: 10.3390/neurolint14020025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Int ISSN: 2035-8385
Clinical Efficacy and Safety.
| Author (Year) | Groups Studied and Intervention | Results and Findings | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1: [ | Psychiatric ( | MDD/PTSD individuals showed significant improvement in the severity of depressive symptoms at both 2-h and one-day post-ketamine administration (severity decreased from moderate depression at baseline to mild depression). | Intravenous subanesthetic doses of ketamine have shown reduced psychiatric distress in both MDD and PTSD. |
| Study 2: [ | Adults 21–80 years of age with major depressive disorder (MDD) with a poor response to at least three therapeutic trials of an antidepressant. | At day seven post-treatment, improvement in processing speed, verbal learning, and visual learning from the baseline was noticed. | Processing speed, verbal learning, and visual learning improved at the end of the study after receiving ketamine compared with baseline. |
| Study 3: [ | Inclusion criteria: Adults ranging from 18–65 years old, at least moderate depression (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 25), evidence of treatment resistance, and secondary analysis baseline MADRS-SI suicide item score ≥ 2. | Ketamine MADRS-SI scores were lower than that of midazolam at 2 h and seven days post-infusion. | Compared with midazolam, a single ketamine infusion elicited larger reduction in SI, with maximal effects measured at seven days post-infusion. |
| Study 4: Ketamine vs. midazolam [ | Adults ( | A single ketamine infusion elicited a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms at the primary efficacy endpoint compared with midazolam (24 h post-infusion). | Repeated ketamine infusions have cumulative and sustained antidepressant effects that were maintained among responders through once-weekly infusions. |
| Study 5: Ketamine vs. ECT [ | Fifty patients suffering from depression were treated with either serial ketamine infusions or ECT. | ECT and ketamine administration were equally effective. | Related to its pro-cognitive effects and faster antidepressant effect, serial ketamine administration might be a more favorable short-term treatment option than ECT. |
| Study 6: Ketamine vs. Haloperidol [ | Pre-anesthetic, pharmacologic prevention of postoperative brain dysfunction with haloperidol, ketamine, and the combination of both vs. placebo in 182 patients. | None of the three pharmacologic interventions (haloperidol, ketamine, or both drugs combined) was significantly superior to placebo for preventing postoperative brain dysfunction and delirium. | The study results offer no opportunity for an unprecedented option for preventing postoperative cognitive decline including delirium. |